GNU bug report logs - #78866
[PATCH] (Finsert_file_contents): Refine commit d07af40d8826

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 02:30:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 78866 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#78866: [PATCH] (Finsert_file_contents): Refine commit d07af40d8826
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 16:44:08 +0300
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: 78866 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 09:38:14 -0400
> 
> > I agree that we should prompt, but I don't understand the logic behind
> > the proposed solution.  Why is it OK not to prompt when VISIT is
> > non-nil?  It is true that in that case we will be reading from
> > FILENAME, but the contents after the insertion will not necessarily be
> > identical to FILENAME, because not necessarily the entire contents of
> > the buffer is erased.
> 
> If VISIT is non-nil, then REPLACE is also non-nil (or irrelevant
> because the buffer is empty):
> 
>     if (!NILP (visit))
>       {
>         if (!NILP (beg) || !NILP (end))
>           error ("Attempt to visit less than an entire file");
>         if (BEG < Z && NILP (replace))
>           error ("Cannot do file visiting in a non-empty buffer");
>       }

Sure, but REPLACE replaces only the accessible portion of the buffert,
not all of it.




This bug report was last modified 55 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.