GNU bug report logs - #78848
Tree-sitter compatibility report: tags and sources

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 78848 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 78848 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver <at> mavit.org.uk>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Tree-sitter compatibility report: tags and sources
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:56:29 +0100 (BST)

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Back in January, there was some discussion on emacs-devel about how the Tree-sitter parser compatibility report generated by admin/tree-sitter/treesit-admin.el could be made more helpful for distribution packagers: https://yhetil.org/emacs-devel/BF8AAD24-2001-4C56-BB63-96E328CD011B <at> gmail.com/#t

Following on from that, here are some patches to enhance the report.

-- 
Peter Oliver

[0001-New-function-treesit-language-git-version-tags.patch (text/plain, attachment)]

[0002-Show-also-tagged-versions-on-Tree-sitter-compatibili.patch (text/plain, attachment)]

[0003-Link-to-Tree-sitter-parser-sources-from-compatibilit.patch (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 78848 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
To: Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver <at> mavit.org.uk>
Cc: 78848 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78848: Tree-sitter compatibility report: tags and sources
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:35:22 +0200

Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver <at> mavit.org.uk> writes:

Hi Peter,

> Following on from that, here are some patches to enhance the report.

I have no comments on the changes, 'cos I'm not the consumer of the
report. I'll run everything on emba.

But the question still remains, where the generated report from emba
shall go to. Currently, it is contained in the artifacts of the job
test-tree-sitter. Is this sufficient?

Best regards, Michael.

Message #11 received at 78848 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver <at> mavit.org.uk>
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
Cc: 78848 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78848: Tree-sitter compatibility report: tags and sources
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:24:46 +0100 (BST)

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Fri, 20 Jun 2025, Michael Albinus wrote:

> Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver <at> mavit.org.uk> writes:
>
> But the question still remains, where the generated report from emba
> shall go to. Currently, it is contained in the artifacts of the job
> test-tree-sitter. Is this sufficient?

It’s better than nothing.  It would be better if we could put the report at a stable URL so we can bookmark/link to it, but I think we ran out of ideas on how to do that from Emba.

For anyone wondering how to find this report, I’ll note the steps here:

1. Browse to https://emba.gnu.org/emacs/emacs/-/jobs
2. Look for a job named test-tree-sitter on the relevant branch
3. Click on the job number.
4. Under “Job artifacts”, click “Browse”.
5. Navigate the directory structure until you find compatibility-report.html, then click on it.
6. Click to download.
7. Open the downloaded file in a browser.

-- 
Peter Oliver

Message #14 received at 78848 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
To: Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver <at> mavit.org.uk>
Cc: 78848 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78848: Tree-sitter compatibility report: tags and sources
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 20:03:28 +0300

> Back in January, there was some discussion on emacs-devel about how the
> Tree-sitter parser compatibility report generated by
> admin/tree-sitter/treesit-admin.el could be made more helpful for
> distribution packagers:
> https://yhetil.org/emacs-devel/BF8AAD24-2001-4C56-BB63-96E328CD011B <at> gmail.com/#t
>
> Following on from that, here are some patches to enhance the report.

bug#78542 introduced keywords for treesit-language-source-alist.
I adapted treesit-admin--find-latest-compatible-revision and
treesit-admin--unversioned-treesit-language-source-alist for keywords.
But it seems more changes are now required in your patch
to adapt keywords in more places.  Sorry for that.

Message #17 received at 78848 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver <at> mavit.org.uk>
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Cc: 78848 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78848: Tree-sitter compatibility report: tags and sources
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 11:45:41 +0100 (BST)

On Fri, 20 Jun 2025, Juri Linkov wrote:

> bug#78542 introduced keywords for treesit-language-source-alist.
> I adapted treesit-admin--find-latest-compatible-revision and
> treesit-admin--unversioned-treesit-language-source-alist for keywords.
> But it seems more changes are now required in your patch
> to adapt keywords in more places.  Sorry for that.

Thanks for the heads-up, but I think my patches work unmodified.

-- 
Peter Oliver

Message #20 received at 78848 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
To: Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver <at> mavit.org.uk>
Cc: 78848 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78848: Tree-sitter compatibility report: tags and sources
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:49:04 +0300

close 78848 31.0.50
thanks

>> bug#78542 introduced keywords for treesit-language-source-alist.
>> I adapted treesit-admin--find-latest-compatible-revision and
>> treesit-admin--unversioned-treesit-language-source-alist for keywords.
>> But it seems more changes are now required in your patch
>> to adapt keywords in more places.  Sorry for that.
>
> Thanks for the heads-up, but I think my patches work unmodified.

Thanks for the confirmation, so now pushed.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.