GNU bug report logs -
#78843
Various vtable bug fixes and enhancements
Previous Next
Full log
Message #23 received at 78843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 5:42 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> > From: Stéphane Marks <shipmints <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 05:12:46 -0400
> > Cc: 78843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, adam <at> alphapapa.net, sbaugh <at> janestreet.com,
> > larsi <at> gnus.org, arstoffel <at> gmail.com, krisbalintona <at> gmail.com
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 4:59 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > Is it really not feasible to have separate patches for each bugfix and
> > each enhancement (or coherent set of enhancements)? What if we decide
> > to install just some of these changes -- you'd need to update the
> > entire large patch, instead of dropping a relatively small one and
> > leaving the others intact.
> >
> > I hope we elect to adopt them all. It would be much more work to tease
> them all out piecemeal and wouldn't
> > really, in the end, produce a better vtable.
>
> Please also consider the inherent difficulties in reviewing such a
> large (4K lines!) patch.
>
Let's start with the vtable users I looped in actually using it. I can
attach a vtable.el without the patch file and make it easier.
> WRT quoting symbols, there are examples in the texinfo doc collection
> that suggest the convention is not
> > enforced:
>
> They are all bugs that need to be fixed. Patches welcome. "Not
> enforced" would be a wrong conclusion from these omissions.
>
Cool. I have a patch or two to ediff coming and ediff doesn't follow ELisp
formatting conventions which I found confusing.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 38 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.