GNU bug report logs - #78699
[PATCH] gnu: libreoffice: Update to 25.2.3.2.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>

Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 06:38:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 78699 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 78699 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#78699; Package guix-patches. (Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:38:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:38:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libreoffice: Update to 25.2.3.2.
Date: Thu,  5 Jun 2025 08:37:03 +0200
* gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm (libreoffice): Update to 25.2.3.2.
---
 gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm b/gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm
index 4ca0857b01..c8e8123e75 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm
@@ -893,7 +893,7 @@ (define dtoa
 (define-public libreoffice
   (package
     (name "libreoffice")
-    (version "24.8.4.2")               ;keep in sync with hunspell dictionaries
+    (version "25.2.3.2")               ;keep in sync with hunspell dictionaries
     (source
      (origin
        (method url-fetch)
@@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ (define-public libreoffice
           "https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/"
           version "/src/libreoffice-" version ".tar.xz")))
        (sha256
-        (base32 "05qs12z0xkpqy3yl7378d99y82rswic101aw65k1macslcpdwr0m"))))
+        (base32 "1pysqa31by4rhghnfyz8xbygqn6d6fjqm2py1apxkw3xa8g4cm7a"))))
     (build-system glib-or-gtk-build-system)
     (arguments
      (list
-- 
2.49.0





Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#78699; Package guix-patches. (Mon, 09 Jun 2025 19:28:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 78699 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>
Cc: 78699 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: libreoffice: Update to 25.2.3.2.
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 21:26:53 +0200
Am Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 08:37:03AM +0200 schrieb Nicolas Graves:
>      (name "libreoffice")
> -    (version "24.8.4.2")               ;keep in sync with hunspell dictionaries
> +    (version "25.2.3.2")               ;keep in sync with hunspell dictionaries

How about this comment? It looks as if some? all? hunspell-dict-* should
also be updated.

The confusing thing is that some of them are at version 24.8.2.1,
consistent with the remark; but there are also 20161207, 2018.04.16,
20200327, 1.7-2, 0.1 and 6.2.

It would be nice to get an opinion from someone in the know!

Andreas





Reply sent to Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Mon, 09 Jun 2025 20:08:20 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Mon, 09 Jun 2025 20:08:20 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 78699-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>
Cc: 78699-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#78699] [PATCH] gnu: libreoffice: Update to 25.2.3.2.
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 19:38:11 +0200
Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr> writes:

> * gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm (libreoffice): Update to 25.2.3.2.

Applied, thanks!

> +    (version "25.2.3.2")               ;keep in sync with hunspell dictionaries

I checked and I’m not sure this comment is still relevant.  WDYT?

Ludo’.




Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#78699; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 25 Jun 2025 22:38:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #16 received at 78699 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>
To: 78699 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78699: closed (Re: [bug#78699] [PATCH] gnu: libreoffice:
 Update to 25.2.3.2.)
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:37:28 +0200
On 2025-06-09 20:08, GNU bug Tracking System wrote:

> Your bug report
>
> #78699: [PATCH] gnu: libreoffice: Update to 25.2.3.2.
>
> which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.
>
> The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
> If you require more details, please reply to 78699 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
>
> -- 
> 78699: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=78699
> GNU Bug Tracking System
> Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
> From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: [bug#78699] [PATCH] gnu: libreoffice: Update to 25.2.3.2.
> To: Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>
> Cc: 78699-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 19:38:11 +0200
>
> Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr> writes:
>
>> * gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm (libreoffice): Update to 25.2.3.2.
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
>> +    (version "25.2.3.2")               ;keep in sync with hunspell dictionaries
>
> I checked and I’m not sure this comment is still relevant.  WDYT?

Sorry for the late answer. IIRC there is no breaking behavior if there
are not in sync.  I think it's nice to keep a comment to be reminded
that there are also other stuff to update from time to time, but it's
not a need strictly speaking.

I'll try to see the behavior of libreoffice on the core packages branch
without gcc-12 and the patched path introduced because of
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/43579

If it compiles and works properly on my side, I'll most likely send
those patches to the core-packages-team.

>
> Ludo’.
>
> From: Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libreoffice: Update to 25.2.3.2.
> To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
> Cc: Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>
> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:37:03 +0200
>
> * gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm (libreoffice): Update to 25.2.3.2.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm b/gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm
> index 4ca0857b01..c8e8123e75 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm
> @@ -893,7 +893,7 @@ (define dtoa
>  (define-public libreoffice
>    (package
>      (name "libreoffice")
> -    (version "24.8.4.2")               ;keep in sync with hunspell dictionaries
> +    (version "25.2.3.2")               ;keep in sync with hunspell dictionaries
>      (source
>       (origin
>         (method url-fetch)
> @@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ (define-public libreoffice
>            "https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/"
>            version "/src/libreoffice-" version ".tar.xz")))
>         (sha256
> -        (base32 "05qs12z0xkpqy3yl7378d99y82rswic101aw65k1macslcpdwr0m"))))
> +        (base32 "1pysqa31by4rhghnfyz8xbygqn6d6fjqm2py1apxkw3xa8g4cm7a"))))
>      (build-system glib-or-gtk-build-system)
>      (arguments
>       (list

-- 
Best regards,
Nicolas Graves




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 24 Jul 2025 11:24:10 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 22 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.