From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:05:19 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#78585 <78585@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#78585 <78585@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [PATCH] TeX-fold-verbs: improve macro recognition Reply-To: bug#78585 <78585@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:05:19 +0000 retitle 78585 [PATCH] TeX-fold-verbs: improve macro recognition reassign 78585 auctex submitter 78585 "Paul D. Nelson" severity 78585 normal tag 78585 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 25 08:53:20 2025 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 May 2025 12:53:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44171 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uJAqt-0000uH-H8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2025 08:53:20 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:48162) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uJAqq-0000tJ-PD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2025 08:53:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uJAqj-0000oZ-8R for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2025 08:53:09 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uJAqh-0007oI-7O for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2025 08:53:08 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-603fdd728ccso1515627a12.2 for ; Sun, 25 May 2025 05:53:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1748177580; x=1748782380; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PLBKeBDyJ5wnHapy7f49/fjKbVpGFPupBLZqLh2RHNY=; b=JXapyssjxO3ry44itfcojquu1ZQUajdelNQpbU5OpS5j4oLHbKBu1CQp0Y+Slnx7jC kHV9uInKxj+Yt2JgA49IlNoDXxPi9HeomWINNW9HCXtq60fE/v0B9EMg3s0efmWYb3hZ GgaIz7+cch5WbiJcywdXV4yyKZ660mPTWKwfXlzPajQSUOLWavdoUnr5yNol56wgxCN1 BQOYwW++92MTGsuy0YRV+qWkWSFDyPNIwCCV3wDfYxMEgO+OmcOO/ggPVTxBMvPgqpFQ mDsXnFm05MDg/waTNgu/w68G4w8F4XSpJEYU9m4nq6J1PuEBNCC7Kj0LfzGZ0HQsZpNK 4upw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1748177580; x=1748782380; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PLBKeBDyJ5wnHapy7f49/fjKbVpGFPupBLZqLh2RHNY=; b=HJJcEB9h6acIyzhyBqyUc7NjuObXm/Q3rFCBsUL5pMdL6DWO7NDdyRulf+gvcUoHeN Ekbx6mPVsqAjHoCZ8Az4JUq2/FeigAenS/cAx3oLSm8bV4Wdvz0wVkc4QwLjxQwX3yOf AbrSFxKB5fdDPZ+yUDwSDPR0MPqjc43VF/QMXbU+DTgOHHPqIX5u4mXhTQ8J1mxUgGNh edk2h2qDdsXUSchMD0Pdg2+p4a0uD94y6tlVF8Oc9T7r7RvpkA+4iTjF4qKGVhDJ/kVE Ljaf+sCBNOHo8VLNyX+UaxgSgZ+RHkbsf1UbtIzdZCUWJni9YsvODNGWw8cbmboiYKGi e5wg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyGJdVz4PFfdAQADh21ZZ3pfbhCgAhQCMZxa6hi+GAq5OD8NFxz DC149hHcwaq5hJnswHB8wlTHC5aQ47QO+y+A/MH/utEq775rlelROg7QDkDPXd60 X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvGv1/l5j1j74sfSGwiRvzZXkP3K1vbAUPhB/pIRBqH5Jo4aZxxpyrX3KRcgms 20LAuXXfXPlmljXdg/djYuYx17n0mI7HYB629pfGa+X1olN8j59JUywF4v7MJ/k/kIY1yvPAh9h lUYXW6h4uGtBPiqZ3Bhn5cMBVnVjvDV5V3Hp0w1RdIyAF4UPtTtnMkjxxZs2AnYQaHAxBJe4zd6 jS8p2UMfMhyWAfNFxuOo6N7zBAWoGOsxT/N1qIVFcLYV38F9Q811yaRANY1XcARHEHs1uMkcuxk tnai85rcfI+1MbCwW3lzjNGpgUuDcYMC+b/hMa1r7bZro7Q4UOabwWXnhfWhrzJat/vj X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHzKsa4GTsFCc5IjClDn8FFzKDeV+Y0Z/NfB0cqgMHSHb3WlViKeGm7BOG4pqLn8Y7SBU9D7A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2d26:b0:ad4:f9fc:20a5 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ad85b1d0f81mr450130266b.32.1748177579957; Sun, 25 May 2025 05:52:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([185.229.154.237]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-ad5505131f7sm1324941166b.67.2025.05.25.05.52.59 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 25 May 2025 05:52:59 -0700 (PDT) From: "Paul D. Nelson" To: bug-auctex@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] TeX-fold-verbs: improve macro recognition Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 14:52:58 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::532; envelope-from=ultrono@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x532.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi all, This patch adds a couple "boundary checks" to the verbatim folding code I contributed earlier. Here's a sample document illustrating what could go wrong: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- \documentclass{article} \usepackage{pythontex} \NewDocumentCommand{\pyvm}{ m }{\mbox{\pyv{#1}}} \begin{document} $\pyvm{42}$ \end{document} --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- With the previous code, folding would trigger on \pyvm{42} as if it were \pyv with delimiter m. The fix is to require a word boundary in the macro-matching regexp. The other change is a bounds check. I made this change locally a few months ago, and think it was motivated by a parsing error, but unfortunately forgot to save a minimal reproduction. Any feedback welcome. Thanks, best, Paul --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-TeX-fold-verbs-improve-delimiter-and-macro-handling.patch >From f84918335e0ae99921f68458c4bc6b91bd243bad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Nelson Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 14:51:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] TeX-fold-verbs: improve delimiter and macro handling * tex-fold.el (TeX-fold--verb-data): Add check to ensure backward-sexp doesn't jump before macro boundaries when matching braces. (TeX-fold-verbs): Require word boundary after macro name in regexp to prevent folding partial macro matches (e.g., \pyv in \pyvm). --- tex-fold.el | 21 +++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/tex-fold.el b/tex-fold.el index 2c10cc27..766270ef 100644 --- a/tex-fold.el +++ b/tex-fold.el @@ -1362,13 +1362,17 @@ only in LaTeX modes." ?\{ end-delim-char)) (start-delim (char-to-string start-delim-char)) - (verb-arg-start - (1+ (progn - (goto-char bound-end) - (if (string= start-delim TeX-grop) - (progn (backward-sexp) (point)) - (forward-char -1) - (search-backward start-delim bound-start t))))) + (start-delim-pos + (save-excursion + (goto-char bound-end) + (if (string= start-delim TeX-grop) ; "{" + (when-let* ((matching-brace (save-excursion (backward-sexp) + (point)))) + (and (>= matching-brace bound-start) matching-brace)) + ;; delimiter is, e.g., "|" + (goto-char (1- bound-end)) + (search-backward start-delim bound-start t)))) + (verb-arg-start (1+ start-delim-pos)) (verb-arg-end (1- bound-end))) (list bound-start bound-end @@ -1384,7 +1388,8 @@ Replaces the verbatim content with its own text." (regexp-opt (append (LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces) - (LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims)))))) + (LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims))) + "\\_>"))) (while (let ((case-fold-search nil)) (re-search-forward re end t)) (when-let* ((data (TeX-fold--verb-data)) -- 2.39.3 (Apple Git-145) --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 26 08:23:51 2025 Received: (at 78585) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2025 12:23:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55703 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uJWrv-0002TE-3v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2025 08:23:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55140) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uJWrs-0002Sj-EX for 78585@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2025 08:23:48 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uJWrm-0000ip-Jl; Mon, 26 May 2025 08:23:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=42cfWzuKuS4o0IvglbXi6YOxZlqm8lIto5Q2Syo6Wt4=; b=OP1vbi63Txzwe4rwCKxE rYNUHNQSOT95+hOBU8DVmnZl6BnW+4eCSkH7DrW1vaPHCkiTTw+ejp19ETwuhK/UYxYRkeEedsQUd J733fxPFY0SHU3WLYQJc34dXI9sZXS7PlvzgRDafXHFZ+ODGymio83epC+gJ8mbqi9YjSkz412+op CkSzvRPaHq1KKfG7PHSfkuDIBiX/BUYPFHoeBSnA9Pa6GUtLisC2KDSQW9HEkKLLJsbnqJfqsx3Gr Z/03zIXRDO5Pq1yQh3ZtMPQ0wOLmeqLuJAiREm52g2lMDUUfGoDlwkGUPW1O3EtH4GASU2g1rH0JH XJLtgLrj/n5YBg==; From: Arash Esbati To: "Paul D. Nelson" Subject: Re: bug#78585: [PATCH] TeX-fold-verbs: improve macro recognition In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 14:23:37 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78585 Cc: 78585@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Paul, "Paul D. Nelson" writes: > This patch adds a couple "boundary checks" to the verbatim folding code > I contributed earlier. > > Here's a sample document illustrating what could go wrong: > > \documentclass{article} > \usepackage{pythontex} > \NewDocumentCommand{\pyvm}{ m }{\mbox{\pyv{#1}}} > > \begin{document} > > $\pyvm{42}$ > > \end{document} Yes, I see what you mean. > With the previous code, folding would trigger on \pyvm{42} as if it were > \pyv with delimiter m. The fix is to require a word boundary in the > macro-matching regexp. > > The other change is a bounds check. I made this change locally a few > months ago, and think it was motivated by a parsing error, but > unfortunately forgot to save a minimal reproduction. > > Any feedback welcome. See below. > From f84918335e0ae99921f68458c4bc6b91bd243bad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Paul Nelson > Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 14:51:33 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] TeX-fold-verbs: improve delimiter and macro handling > > * tex-fold.el (TeX-fold--verb-data): Add check to ensure > backward-sexp doesn't jump before macro boundaries when matching > braces. > (TeX-fold-verbs): Require word boundary after macro name in > regexp to prevent folding partial macro matches (e.g., \pyv in > \pyvm). > --- > tex-fold.el | 21 +++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tex-fold.el b/tex-fold.el > index 2c10cc27..766270ef 100644 > --- a/tex-fold.el > +++ b/tex-fold.el > @@ -1362,13 +1362,17 @@ only in LaTeX modes." > ?\{ > end-delim-char)) > (start-delim (char-to-string start-delim-char)) > - (verb-arg-start > - (1+ (progn > - (goto-char bound-end) > - (if (string= start-delim TeX-grop) > - (progn (backward-sexp) (point)) > - (forward-char -1) > - (search-backward start-delim bound-start t))))) > + (start-delim-pos > + (save-excursion > + (goto-char bound-end) > + (if (string= start-delim TeX-grop) ; "{" > + (when-let* ((matching-brace (save-excursion (backward-sexp) > + (point)))) > + (and (>= matching-brace bound-start) matching-brace)) > + ;; delimiter is, e.g., "|" > + (goto-char (1- bound-end)) > + (search-backward start-delim bound-start t)))) > + (verb-arg-start (1+ start-delim-pos)) > (verb-arg-end (1- bound-end))) > (list bound-start > bound-end > @@ -1384,7 +1388,8 @@ Replaces the verbatim content with its own text." > (regexp-opt > (append > (LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces) > - (LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims)))))) > + (LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims))) > + "\\_>"))) Why do you use the "\\_>" boundary? I would have expected "\\b" or "\\>"? Am I missing something? Best, Arash From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 26 12:12:03 2025 Received: (at 78585) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2025 16:12:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58548 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uJaQk-0003ZG-VN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2025 12:12:03 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]:59477) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uJaQi-0003YJ-L0 for 78585@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2025 12:12:01 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-6021b8b2c5fso4628452a12.2 for <78585@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 26 May 2025 09:12:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1748275914; x=1748880714; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NKRu2jGTofvs3HPZV70LZpdskrtMVqqalF3qQ+PazMs=; b=d8gmLmFviKtQ1T52IVEKHLRbVfWK3YBkA4eQmRX2PbjmKQCJ4WgTkBc3wTOfCUUIVg rKpKggOgxJxxU+mKRI0nAyZc8bQ3BWrsn27dWOI57RP4y1Cg6JCdclBY1t+6hsXD9qG8 68wUdLCtf3LXtcEJUO+yR7wXOAvZQKp1Q5yXOac2zR+42cRY0bCs5CyQOB1jHVFyv51V 0ZPy1BrbBB0xDD1QEH2j2vpLBCsredlHBCH9MfzvYdDZXkPSBkKOhWZHwTUk7W+y2d6K yQ8cigeazhlSXnmNrtD37EGBYfMcWgoiZZcRvAimXfm/Z5fzTFItj+fbDAmWhqt2DayO XDuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1748275914; x=1748880714; h=mime-version:message-id:date:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NKRu2jGTofvs3HPZV70LZpdskrtMVqqalF3qQ+PazMs=; b=DsqZMpCtKsivoG3q+WfTN5LqdXWbTIMc/7YH+8HHAKaSn7u0Eegq70IcTXQkyobLvO dGkt95wQk/VS9tkPuTIWHDW35f0gaHdJ5xHFh0zbUYkuKsRkE6t0IKTqd//yXhtOcPmM 8BJcGlOGZbSmou9M+KKnD+i30H0gJhD7xSp5BFgI3xZ/CejiY2dgjvRIHBVeS83JcX7u IKcbpU+k65KxCNL7NQMhvjKEMCfH8y3/x0AEhcaf7ZrqBLYSqEHJ8OxGSoTXD5CtYy4Z UOXaqSUGy7/I9i9guQuJUYO1JYny1vunYRsHS0cjAMj4J/NjC1Ey69lD0cV5/JizUuwj h3pg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzD9aAwU9SKqE7XkXTZJbLROsFMRKSbHJrSUVJw4mNzgaFWT/fx 9w5k80B2SijywQ3lNaBphv03/eM99oTT82d0+fAnbDnCgmYR81IIwt96fhFAPI33 X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvxVfSKynf5cdVBQVwbSkPOnnG6Jty2RtpVy/j07tv/I9mdZ+paTk1eluJIale 2ycfXHYzPO/AhfRGw8mD+rzm06qzfT/BDyoARJEOPOiyc0LcODXLbc8ZZgnegEKoS3l1JK2m8wh tl8hIBYCWXWcMbqDjHO55C6VBRAJIV9sXXIfNsygcxzmPDl7HX7IplXeK9EQkFEu1YnaIfS037R GWpKfJKt6pWi55r7wdUmx5WL3HCdaFtMNL6kWZ9rSjChxI7U5SfZUMoRX0rZaKOz0mLbMyBpDyE k9UyjJGYW46vaW8sOoZ0yqf8V5rwRvnRPZFYr8e/oqAiNkLkJZQcYBWh0yTYLn6wKyi5mBpAYKi Zfj+JZyUIIWGP X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGpTDNEHHSAdz2tePE2g3p6flIukLIg38wGaty3JAMaBzoBXUQMnT7GEYKscry0LozMRUrmQA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:34cb:b0:602:346b:1509 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-602d906e3eemr6516859a12.9.1748275914306; Mon, 26 May 2025 09:11:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (users-1190.st.net.au.dk. [130.225.0.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-604b79dc22fsm1756437a12.14.2025.05.26.09.11.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 26 May 2025 09:11:53 -0700 (PDT) From: "Paul D. Nelson" To: Arash Esbati Subject: Re: bug#78585: [PATCH] TeX-fold-verbs: improve macro recognition In-Reply-To: (message from Arash Esbati on Mon, 26 May 2025 14:23:37 +0200) Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 18:11:53 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78585 Cc: 78585@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Arash, Thanks for your feedback. >> @@ -1384,7 +1388,8 @@ Replaces the verbatim content with its own text." >> (regexp-opt >> (append >> (LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces) >> - (LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims)))))) >> + (LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims))) >> + "\\_>"))) > > Why do you use the "\\_>" boundary? I would have expected "\\b" or > "\\>"? Am I missing something? I had in mind stuff like: (string-match "\\\\verb\\*\\_>" "\\verb*") ; t (string-match "\\\\verb\\*\\>" "\\verb*") ; nil (string-match "\\\\verb\\*\b" "\\verb*") ; nil (I'll confess that I am not too familiar with what sorts of verbatim macro names are out there, but figured ending on a symbol boundary would be relatively safe.) Paul From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 27 04:52:39 2025 Received: (at 78585-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2025 08:52:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38089 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uJq35-0000Ww-3T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2025 04:52:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52696) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uJq2x-0000WH-Of for 78585-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2025 04:52:35 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uJq2s-0001vA-2b; Tue, 27 May 2025 04:52:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=NfNiS1KhvlKatqhM1jdFpChNAXFONjToLqAFYJozjmc=; b=V/Q8a4gCV14YHCijEhXl kuEcoROKqEReNgchKSqp9k62chZm06i0hDPTKksS0ncgpZcIcSiMGs4uADt9fkAnM1Da8I95yS7u4 0i7eiOdhof1OC7e2zeuTx2CKwBpL450gwrkZV6aUelBtQwsqYEnJL89mb0giRTL6cbyco01IsvHX0 S3/1be2+zjFmsxjK37b//GFibOHO5vTv7SUXJ9UIzlo3GB77Y6y2Urd+rkq+qw/KjSZ6eZvViIkmM XMt+dlLqqvUIsJAtZlH4BbcrgRUTUWb8adP74dfMZjuqazzHmvXoNbucJfkkcC+Njukaf9xVzHNvz qb1Lk6wOX3/wSA==; From: Arash Esbati To: "Paul D. Nelson" Subject: Re: bug#78585: [PATCH] TeX-fold-verbs: improve macro recognition In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 10:52:21 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78585-done Cc: 78585-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Paul, "Paul D. Nelson" writes: > I had in mind stuff like: > > (string-match "\\\\verb\\*\\_>" "\\verb*") ; t > (string-match "\\\\verb\\*\\>" "\\verb*") ; nil > (string-match "\\\\verb\\*\b" "\\verb*") ; nil > > (I'll confess that I am not too familiar with what sorts of verbatim > macro names are out there, but figured ending on a symbol boundary would > be relatively safe.) Ah, yes, thanks, there are also starred versions. I installed your patch and therefore closing this report. Thanks again for your contribution. Best, Arash