Subject: bug#78499: tramp-accept-process-output busy-waits

From: Michael Albinus <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 09:47:14 +0200

Daniel Colascione <[email-masked]> writes:

Hi Daniel,

> tramp-accept-process-output should wait for something to actually happen
> to the process from which we're trying to accept output, not just return
> immediately after specifying a zero timeout and rely on the caller
> to poll.

tramp-accept-process-output has seen several implementation iterations
ove the years. I'm happy, that it looks stable now.

Could you please show a problem with the current implementation, which
needs to be fixed?

Best regards, Michael.