GNU bug report logs - #78474
31.0.50; Wrong char insertion in rxvt

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Bastien Guerry <bzg <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 22:56:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 31.0.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Full log


Message #452 received at 78474 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault <at> gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: bzg <at> gnu.org, Sebastien.Hinderer <at> inria.fr, rpluim <at> gmail.com,
 manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr, 78474 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78474: 31.0.50; Wrong char insertion in rxvt
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:57:50 +0200
Eli Zaretskii, le jeu. 24 juil. 2025 10:56:29 +0300, a ecrit:
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:49:27 +0200
> > From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault <at> gnu.org>
> > Cc: manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr, rpluim <at> gmail.com, bzg <at> gnu.org,
> > 	Sebastien.Hinderer <at> inria.fr, 78474 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > 
> > > > Really, I strongly doubt there will be any kind of difference, since
> > > > it's emacs that goes 100% cpu and the terminal does essentially nothing.
> > > > 
> > > > I tried via ssh, screen and tmux to check, it's just all the
> > > > same: emacs eating 100% and ssh not even eating 1%.
> > > 
> > > That's expected with fast connections, yes.
> > 
> > It eats just 1Mbps.
> > 
> > I looked at the output, this is the amount difference:
> > 
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 samy samy 2154142 24 juil. 09:48 typescript-csiC
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 samy samy 2150934 24 juil. 09:46 typescript-tabbs
> 
> Thanks.  This is merely a 0.15% difference.  With what terminfo entry
> was this done?

It was xterm.

Samuel




This bug report was last modified 1 day ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.