GNU bug report logs - #78474
31.0.50; Wrong char insertion in rxvt

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault <at> gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: bzg <at> gnu.org, Sebastien.Hinderer <at> inria.fr, rpluim <at> gmail.com, manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr, 78474 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#78474: 31.0.50; Wrong char insertion in rxvt
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:14:46 +0200

Eli Zaretskii, le jeu. 24 juil. 2025 09:40:43 +0300, a ecrit:
> > From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault <at> gnu.org>
> > The choice of terminal hardly changes anything at all. It's emacs that
> > consumes one core 100%, while the terminal consumes 1-3% only.
> 
> I'd encourage others to run similar benchmarks on these and other
> terminals.  Gnome-terminal, alacritty, kitty, screen, tmux, and the
> Linux console come to mind.  Also, if someone can test this in a
> remote-login session, especially over a slow connection, those numbers
> would be important to have.

Really, I strongly doubt there will be any kind of difference, since
it's emacs that goes 100% cpu and the terminal does essentially nothing.

I tried via ssh, screen and tmux to check, it's just all the
same: emacs eating 100% and ssh not even eating 1%.

(gnome-terminal is libvte-based, so it's the same as mate-terminal)

Samuel

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.