GNU bug report logs - #78409
LDADD vs. LDFLAGS

Previous Next

Package: automake;

Reported by: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>

Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 16:46:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>
Subject: bug#78409: closed (Re: bug#78409: Acknowledgement (LDADD vs.
 LDFLAGS))
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 17:01:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#78409: LDADD vs. LDFLAGS

which was filed against the automake package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 78409 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
78409: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=78409
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>
To: 78409-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78409: Acknowledgement (LDADD vs. LDFLAGS)
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 19:00:25 +0200

Short mail sent by mistake. Sorry.





[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>
To: bug-automake <at> gnu.org
Subject: LDADD vs. LDFLAGS
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 18:44:41 +0200

Hi,

The first paragraph in
This bug report was last modified 3 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.