GNU bug report logs - #78409
LDADD vs. LDFLAGS

Previous Next

Package: automake;

Reported by: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>

Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 16:46:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#78409: closed (LDADD vs. LDFLAGS)
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 17:01:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 19:00:25 +0200
with message-id <9016020.OUTRe80PYV <at> nimes>
and subject line Re: bug#78409: Acknowledgement (LDADD vs. LDFLAGS)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #78409,
regarding LDADD vs. LDFLAGS
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
78409: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=78409
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>
To: bug-automake <at> gnu.org
Subject: LDADD vs. LDFLAGS
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 18:44:41 +0200

Hi,

The first paragraph in





[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>
To: 78409-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78409: Acknowledgement (LDADD vs. LDFLAGS)
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 19:00:25 +0200

Short mail sent by mistake. Sorry.
This bug report was last modified 3 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.