GNU bug report logs - #78401
[PATCH] gnu: mupdf: Update to 1.26.0.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Divya Ranjan <divya <at> subvertising.org>

Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 02:54:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo, patch

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #27 received at 78401-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Divya Ranjan <divya <at> subvertising.org>
Cc: 78401-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#78401] [PATCH] gnu: mupdf: Update to 1.26.0., [PATCH] gnu:
 mupdf: Update to 1.26.0., [PATCH] gnu: mupdf: Modify #:make-flags
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 08:15:32 +0900
Hi,

[...]

> Apologies, indeed I had used guix style since I considered that it’d
> be appropriate. I’ve restricted the patch to now only include the
> necessary changes.

[...]

> * gnu/packages/pdf.scm (mupdf): Update to 1.26.0.
> [inputs]: Add brotli
> [arguments]: Use system’s brotli package
> [arguments]: Enable semantic versioning to avoid symlink issues

The things changed (left side of colon) does not need to be repeated.

[...]

>             libx11
>             libxext
>             mujs
> +           brotli

I've added this input at the top in alphabetical order.

[...]

> -              "USE_SONAME=no"           ;install as libmupdf.so
> +              "USE_SONAME=yes"

I checked the build system and the default is 'yes', so I've dropped
this flag.

> Also find the patch for mupdf-1.24, without which several packages
> break (as suggested by the QA).

Are there several packages depending on mupdf-1.24?  I could find only
sioyek, which builds fine with mupdf 1.26, so I removed that extraneous
variant.  See commit 93e74686ea and the two earlier ones.

Thank you!

-- 
Maxim




This bug report was last modified 53 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.