GNU bug report logs - #78360
[PATCH 0/2] gnu: nomacs: Update to 3.21.1.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Sergey Trofimov <sarg <at> sarg.org.ru>

Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 20:32:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Sergey Trofimov <sarg <at> sarg.org.ru>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 78360 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>, z572 <at> z572.online, iyzsong <at> envs.net
Subject: [bug#78360] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add quazip-qt6.
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 12:03:30 +0200
Hi Maxim, Andreas
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Sergey Trofimov <sarg <at> sarg.org.ru> writes:
>
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> writes:
>>
>>> Hello Sergey,
>>>
>>> thanks for the patch, it is always good to get rid of Qt5 dependencies!
>>>
>>> However, I am not convinced about the order of things:
>>> Why add the "-qt6" suffix to the name, in particular since Qt6 should be
>>> the standard now? I think it would be better to do things as with qtbase:
>>> Keep the "name" field the same; rename the quazip variable to quazip-5; 
>>> adapt the packages that currently have quazip as input to use quazip-5.
>>>
>>> I am cc-ing the qt team since they are more competent to give advice.
>
> My opinion is that 'quazip' alone as both the variable name and package
> name would be nicer, for the latest Qt 6 version.
>
> Is quazip-0 still needed?  If not, it can be removed.  And then we can
> introduce a quazip-5 variable.
>
> Does that make sense?

quazip-0 is still used by a few packages. I've prepared a new series
that upgrades such packages to quazip-5.




This bug report was last modified 4 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.