From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:55:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers Resent-From: Rutherther Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: ludo@gnu.org, bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 16:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 78356 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 78356@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: ludo@gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: ludo@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.17468933809146 (code B ref -1); Sat, 10 May 2025 16:10:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2025 16:09:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48610 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uDmlg-0002NM-BN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 May 2025 12:09:40 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:55480) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uDmle-0002Ml-Iu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 May 2025 12:09:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uDmlW-0005x5-IQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 10 May 2025 12:09:30 -0400 Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::] helo=mail.ditigal.xyz) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uDmlU-00089J-Na for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 10 May 2025 12:09:30 -0400 Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e7b7e177 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO) for ; Sat, 10 May 2025 16:09:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Rutherther Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 18:09:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz; i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1746893366; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=6oUEoxsWABqsQfr8v/oSTP0n/fF+XZ+f4TBiQkucvy4=; b=nhYGirbELcXNRAOFA9AL7vVzir9l6FKPy9o5PCTmzcqOiN/rS3VYP4pCRhsVgMCCSsdFC Y+KY//H0/0FiGby6KbvwOlWmiRqij/5ck+pUrhw8K4oNyIptKFzjV1w6k+XyL5QNw60I0ce fQXNNSi25m/vbf6RfbJG7s2r7tXZ5tM= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::; envelope-from=rutherther@ditigal.xyz; helo=mail.ditigal.xyz X-Spam_score_int: 4 X-Spam_score: 0.4 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=0.001, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 3.4 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Seems that the recent commit 'Lock mounts by default' a57ed987ffd1452ba5a4d70feb54893e99b8e076 has broken both guix system container and guix home container. For system container, the system container [...] Content analysis details: (3.4 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom; id=rutherther%40ditigal.xyz; ip=2001%3A470%3A142%3A%3A17; r=debbugs.gnu.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Seems that the recent commit 'Lock mounts by default' a57ed987ffd1452ba5a4d70feb54893e99b8e076 has broken both guix system container and guix home container. For system container, the system container [...] Content analysis details: (2.4 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=rutherther%40ditigal.xyz;ip=2001%3A470%3A142%3A%3A17;r=debbugs.gnu.org] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Seems that the recent commit 'Lock mounts by default' a57ed987ffd1452ba5a4d70feb54893e99b8e076 has broken both guix system container and guix home container. For system container, the system container command finishes fine, but then running the run-container script fails. For home container the command itself errors out, since it's what is starting the container as well. Here are the backtraces: guix system: ``` Backtrace: 7 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/p3m2srwhv49gv1lk2yi4i73b9mn=E2=80= =A6") In gnu/build/linux-container.scm: 368:8 6 (call-with-temporary-directory #) 476:16 5 (_ "/tmp/guix-directory.DGavex") 62:6 4 (call-with-clean-exit #) 323:22 3 (_) 215:2 2 (initialize-user-namespace 1 65536 #:host-uid _ # _ # _ =E2=80= =A6) In ice-9/ports.scm: 435:6 1 (call-with-output-file _ _ #:binary _ #:encoding _) In unknown file: 0 (close-port #) ERROR: In procedure close-port: In procedure fport_write: Operation not permitted system container is running as PID #f Run 'sudo guix container exec #f /run/current-system/profile/bin/bash --log= in' or run 'sudo nsenter -a -t #f' to get a shell into it. Backtrace: 3 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/p3m2srwhv49gv1lk2yi4i73b9mn=E2=80= =A6") In gnu/build/linux-container.scm: 368:8 2 (call-with-temporary-directory #) 485:7 1 (_ "/tmp/guix-directory.DGavex") In unknown file: 0 (waitpid #f #) ``` guix home: ``` Backtrace: In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1752:10 14 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) In unknown file: 13 (apply-smob/0 #) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 724:2 12 (call-with-prompt _ _ #) In ice-9/eval.scm: 619:8 11 (_ #(#(#))) In ice-9/command-line.scm: 185:19 10 (_ #) In unknown file: 9 (eval (begin (use-modules (guix build utils) (# ?)) # ?) ?) In ice-9/eval.scm: 619:8 8 (_ #f) In unknown file: 7 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/9kr07956x74cs9cql5jj3kdvb7f?") In ice-9/eval.scm: 619:8 6 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(# ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?)) 626:19 5 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(# ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?)) 619:8 4 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(# ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?)) In unknown file: 3 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/j7v0sgg2grb9x8n6h2xh2cyvyf7?") In ice-9/eval.scm: 293:34 2 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(# ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?)) In ice-9/ports.scm: 450:11 1 (call-with-input-file _ # ?) In unknown file: 0 (open-file # "r" #:encoding #f # #f) ERROR: In procedure open-file: Wrong type (expecting string): # ``` Additionally at one moment I was able to get an error message with guix home that unshare has gotten an invalid argument, the argument was just a number. Unfortunately I was not able to understand what the issue is to fix it. Regards Rutherther From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 11 10:59:51 2025 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2025 14:59:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36963 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uE89d-0003rS-VV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2025 10:59:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51130) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uE89R-0003pR-VF for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2025 10:59:40 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uE89M-00010M-MP for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2025 10:59:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:Subject:From:To:Date:in-reply-to: references; bh=SAYb6VuyLsaXTTiWR87IiGNoQXvhhXejhXWkyD+erBA=; b=DNmUCdKGH4Mpb2 o2BKAyCPfwvUperUtQuI7o2Y6G9AELBmCgFKIJ2aC3fIDUq/oK5Sz4UjzR1To8D6kPgA5OIvkpxsc QareasLguCTAntIWmq5U2biKXcJHjn74L5JGIzdNVp2DyKzBsYRB0RskJOHG1CnlE/6oTFrI4M94C +ed6fjowiyLyBre3UhJTXnoS7zDdqxN2OgE08DUXXb+l9HhY4vx2t5GHqma2h5GdVIOoNrK2+ihCW w/CLRQsfskyJuOXfkEyNnLI8OML62b/kxDbU7LSbOxUU/FG9KM+JAnPkcHbIcr5dX9W+k6H7gaA8A yED9UFOw5tfoW7oZSSDg==; Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 18:36:47 +0200 Message-Id: <87selc2zj4.fsf_-_@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #78356 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) severity 78356 important quit From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:55:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 08:55:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 78356 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Rutherther Cc: 78356@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 78356-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B78356.174704009715071 (code B ref 78356); Mon, 12 May 2025 08:55:03 +0000 Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2025 08:54:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50071 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uEOw5-0003uw-6h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 04:54:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45040) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uEOvw-0003u6-9i for 78356@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 04:54:49 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uEOvq-00033T-U2; Mon, 12 May 2025 04:54:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=9GsGOqt8ZbChnqVVTBwyaVHOVluWG80cWD9xGzW2SxM=; b=h8ZiZDFcBc1dLI/Wlr+C 5/fIODbgbDd+JkJz/PTBzj+PTW88Bo0ah9EY4QwIafkOH9g9y14VADaP7i/cjEnFTI5PtcRT/0fZT AIPDWMsCA077J1r3qZB8XaqrCiJDcCrYRpab7eKqkEnCY8LmLmnqcuD3pF4qtk50dXAoZVK+hGZpk BpJVy/wTGEud0Sxfq+1GjSEXo+KH37Is56X95E7pNpOHhZNeL82040waaWmz4AGxb8AFS8wWiNga6 gECJCcGuNfjskmsjgNNa1viY3IJVUfIqs/urN9HhHa08cCR1ZN04yAgHjiyEsI8fepNWqSgSmnJV+ gbLVg8P0wTF97Q==; From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> (rutherther@ditigal.xyz's message of "Sat, 10 May 2025 18:09:24 +0200") References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 10:54:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) Hi, Rutherther writes: > Seems that the recent commit 'Lock mounts by default' > a57ed987ffd1452ba5a4d70feb54893e99b8e076 has broken both guix system > container and guix home container. For system container, the system > container command finishes fine, but then running the run-container > script fails. For home container the command itself errors out, since > it's what is starting the container as well. > > Here are the backtraces: > guix system: Fixed in 437bb9ece55f37d4b5a62cafc98c0c3b848a53ce. > guix home: What command did you run, precisely? I cannot experience it: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix describe Generation 345 mai 11 2025 23:03:38 (current) shepherd a54a503 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/shepherd.git branch: main commit: a54a503b01f9da4f6fb49d736dcf90da0fe51f1b guile af96820 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guile.git branch: main commit: af96820e072d18c49ac03e80c6f3466d568dc77d guix 300d29e repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 300d29e69988caf23684f08effa51f621c7ec083 $ guix home container doc/he-config-bare-bones.scm substitute: looking for substitutes on 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% substitute: looking for substitutes on 'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... 1= 00.0% substitute: looking for substitutes on 'https://guix.bordeaux.inria.fr'... = 100.0% The following derivations will be built: /gnu/store/3j1dim91nm280hfhfjh9j130f77svhpk-provenance.drv /gnu/store/ni8rlk32hbr7s6gyps0dr0lfy7g9c5dl-shepherd.conf.drv /gnu/store/4khnkn4rab0p6vv9h99n9yfmk2lm1jwj-on-first-login.drv /gnu/store/lm40rfw0y4jank8bw5m05mjkwbw9w1bd-bashrc.drv /gnu/store/6as6qxw72lcr90gml6wk8mjib5rj8j87-files.drv /gnu/store/dqlgr0jg3kiyzbbc4pmd9vk188sl3kh1-activate.drv /gnu/store/qdsfz93g85l509qvw199j2b86nh2iqz8-profile.drv /gnu/store/jig19g154iqhp7yml0yd93g3rqhf855k-home.drv building /gnu/store/3j1dim91nm280hfhfjh9j130f77svhpk-provenance.drv... building /gnu/store/lm40rfw0y4jank8bw5m05mjkwbw9w1bd-bashrc.drv... building CA certificate bundle... listing Emacs sub-directories... building /gnu/store/ni8rlk32hbr7s6gyps0dr0lfy7g9c5dl-shepherd.conf.drv... building profile with 3 packages... building /gnu/store/dqlgr0jg3kiyzbbc4pmd9vk188sl3kh1-activate.drv... building /gnu/store/6as6qxw72lcr90gml6wk8mjib5rj8j87-files.drv... building /gnu/store/4khnkn4rab0p6vv9h99n9yfmk2lm1jwj-on-first-login.drv... building /gnu/store/jig19g154iqhp7yml0yd93g3rqhf855k-home.drv... The following derivations will be built: /gnu/store/si9ibx12dkqir83z7bd0bic06d9a0p9q-module-import.drv /gnu/store/md9kdf2whka0gnaylhypbrw760184wk1-home-system-profile.drv building profile with 1 package... building /gnu/store/si9ibx12dkqir83z7bd0bic06d9a0p9q-module-import.drv... WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides core bi= nding `delete' WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides core bi= nding `delete' Symlinking /home/ludo/.bashrc -> /gnu/store/b9ppn0jdrda5h88mw5x35m2jvms8izw= 6-bashrc... done Symlinking /home/ludo/.bash_profile -> /gnu/store/gghay5fzpad5w7082nnk6z9lj= 7q00drv-bash_profile... done Symlinking /home/ludo/.profile -> /gnu/store/vvxqfhlkpi90bgmfh1b03kkwfq7pmf= kk-shell-profile... done Symlinking /home/ludo/.config/test.conf -> /gnu/store/i8wsnvh1q8lbgyf50vapf= sn2rfj7a2nc-tmp-file.txt... done Symlinking /home/ludo/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf -> /gnu/store/mw4clgkwj= 3rvlnfv0gd694aabvamr0sa-fonts.conf... done Symlinking /home/ludo/.config/shepherd/init.scm -> /gnu/store/ysg5icpancicn= 1hi2gfd1q3xvmmgb8lf-shepherd.conf... done done Finished updating symlinks. Comparing /gnu/store/non-existing-generation/profile/share/fonts and /gnu/store/9ylfbl50dlng3rqp1kvd3qalr87yyjcl-home/profile/share/fo= nts... done (same) Evaluating on-change gexps. On-change gexps evaluation finished. ludo@ribbon ~$ id uid=3D1000(ludo) gid=3D1000(users) groups=3D1000(users),65534(overflow) ludo@ribbon ~$ ls ludo@ribbon ~$ logout --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:55:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers Resent-From: Rutherther Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 09:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 78356 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 78356@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 78356-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B78356.174704135219769 (code B ref 78356); Mon, 12 May 2025 09:16:02 +0000 Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2025 09:15:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50159 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uEPGJ-00058n-Eo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 05:15:51 -0400 Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::]:52766 helo=mail.ditigal.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uEPGB-00058G-Sv for 78356@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 05:15:46 -0400 Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 519a3c73 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Mon, 12 May 2025 09:15:35 +0000 (UTC) From: Rutherther In-Reply-To: <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 11:15:33 +0200 Message-ID: <871psuxk96.fsf@ditigal.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz; i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1747041335; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=BRo+vXiHn56/QtbMo2gyxkKQlkDvGMBFWYsdYw1xooU=; b=cErKikeZnKuUu+C2xWCSC/IF8gjAkhpZVq/Cns3rYkWlTvRvSEomahKzAoJshK/ZvEBfO I24Al6ih6HOyx32i2QmsuSr9noN0aw7ZgcMExqHpikbNsMvSsV4sVU6XqNq8lIh6FXUfFsp CYfMs5BS2Qs59XDqHpk2RtSm1kaA4WY= X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Ludo Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= writes: > > What command did you run, precisely? I cannot experience it: For home, I tried my own config, and since I was pretty sure any system container is affected (tried a simple one, my one and I know one other person reported this in Matrix channel), I didn't try any [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Ludo Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= writes: > > What command did you run, precisely? I cannot experience it: For home, I tried my own config, and since I was pretty sure any system container is affected (tried a simple one, my one and I know one other person reported this in Matrix channel), I didn't try any [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Hi Ludo Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > > What command did you run, precisely? I cannot experience it: For home, I tried my own config, and since I was pretty sure any system container is affected (tried a simple one, my one and I know one other person reported this in Matrix channel), I didn't try anything simpler and just assumed all homes are going to be affected as well. Now trying simpler config you mentioned, that one works fine. The command was `guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-containe= r.scm` in my repository. It's here https://git.ditigal.xyz/~ruther/guix-config. Any idea what service could cause this behavior with lock-mounts? Would be good to isolate it, but I am not sure where to start. Here is the unshare error I was talking about earlier: > guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument Now I am getting it consistently, before it was missing sometimes. Currently on ``` > ./target/guix/bin/guix describe guix 300d29e repository URL: https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-mirror branch: master commit: 300d29e69988caf23684f08effa51f621c7ec083 nonguix 1940698 repository URL: https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix branch: master commit: 19406981a9bf9d0b140180f1f3008cb91f716b4b ruther 1a49e47 repository URL: https://git.ditigal.xyz/~ruther/guix-exprs branch: main commit: 1a49e4760bd922237532fa2eee44bc9e1fe42399 rde bf8f628 repository URL: https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde branch: master commit: bf8f628c4deb9acc94e261db80d301048ea1f0a2 ``` Thanks Rutherther From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:55:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 09:55:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 78356 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Rutherther Cc: 78356@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 78356-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B78356.174704364627607 (code B ref 78356); Mon, 12 May 2025 09:55:03 +0000 Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2025 09:54:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50324 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uEPrK-0007BA-3R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 05:54:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55214) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uEPrG-0007AM-3u for 78356@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 05:54:04 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uEPrA-0000j3-9J; Mon, 12 May 2025 05:53:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=jcznZU4ZI51rZqodMXdS94EVx4O1J3zUJV0sth4Ppho=; b=oWOtkoeE6O32Wcofs+5r bddSXVlU+zkJErn1nUcTcIfuNU1WHavJ0wpzM4N4IbjsNLCzcbJ1PSgoQiQzO/Yoxz/XPXbjL/ICX ZIsWyagY67E+nWyI3rL4FhIFFrYv0wWVoVKXyVvsIPZBuxMzTzO6/yDanYKCO49Fq3RcMN+MCl/Ac SrM3VNpDo8rY8LBQNl4RWrElytlN/m4SjUNyDR0okiIpmty+6PITUvOUrr+NerqKntXLz1oQLRNoU h77Nt+1uU4bTk29S8HrapM3Ej7U/5xmpyCbNw4KRB91u3zWkU5e4Q0vKCAqpB93Bvmlw76haULreR xUDaR/vmypLBZg==; From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: <871psuxk96.fsf@ditigal.xyz> (rutherther@ditigal.xyz's message of "Mon, 12 May 2025 11:15:33 +0200") References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> <871psuxk96.fsf@ditigal.xyz> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4 X-URL: https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu X-Revolutionary-Date: Tridi 23 =?UTF-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 233 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution,?= jour de la Bourrache Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 11:45:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87r00u2mdz.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) Hi, Rutherther writes: > The command was `guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-contai= ner.scm` > in my repository. It's here https://git.ditigal.xyz/~ruther/guix-config. > Any idea what service could cause this behavior with lock-mounts? Would > be good to isolate it, but I am not sure where to start. > > Here is the unshare error I was talking about earlier: >> guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument > Now I am getting it consistently, before it was missing sometimes. Could you copy paste the command and its output, to be sure there=E2=80=99s= no misunderstanding? This is on Guix System, right? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:55:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers Resent-From: Rutherther Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 10:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 78356 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 78356@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 78356-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B78356.17470457762614 (code B ref 78356); Mon, 12 May 2025 10:30:02 +0000 Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2025 10:29:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50545 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uEQPf-0000g5-Og for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 06:29:36 -0400 Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::]:46124 helo=mail.ditigal.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uEQPb-0000fn-Rr for 78356@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 06:29:33 -0400 Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 9e9125bd (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Mon, 12 May 2025 10:29:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Rutherther In-Reply-To: <87r00u2mdz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> <871psuxk96.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 12:29:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87ecwuazr0.fsf@ditigal.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz; i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1747045765; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=G41h4/bhRPsexN1M4VRcQr7TBqtOD8y34LsPKMLlp88=; b=b/MObTnFD9UNUj77V2Ss2gZa5h+RDlL2fUB+sEuAdj6haHOBIWgRVeVUqAMTe8Ct/2dmv TMnxSRZxI+qZ4BVIaX7RCrWQ3aUmIgrRtyyogKF76QvHfzgjE4loVGq5N5sOCpfUofW43gA 3wsHz0UsWaC7oOwI5+PykjM/pZB0wNs= X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther writes: > >> The command was `guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-container.scm` >> in my repository. It's here https://git.ditigal.xyz/~rut [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther writes: > >> The command was `guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-container.scm` >> in my repository. It's here https://git.ditigal.xyz/~rut [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther writes: > >> The command was `guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-conta= iner.scm` >> in my repository. It's here https://git.ditigal.xyz/~ruther/guix-config. >> Any idea what service could cause this behavior with lock-mounts? Would >> be good to isolate it, but I am not sure where to start. >> >> Here is the unshare error I was talking about earlier: >>> guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument >> Now I am getting it consistently, before it was missing sometimes. > > Could you copy paste the command and its output, to be sure there=E2=80= =99s no > misunderstanding? Sure --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- [ruther:~/.setup] main(+68/-13)* 15s =C2=B1=20 > ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-confi= guration.scm=20 guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home channels-emacs)': no code for module (ruther home channels-emacs) ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm:1:0: warning: module name (channels) does no= t match file name 'ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' hint: File `./home/modules/ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' should probably = start with: (define-module (ruther home channels-emacs)) guix home: warning: ambiguous package specification `font-ubuntu' guix home: warning: choosing font-ubuntu@0.83 from ruther/home/fonts.scm:8:2 guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument Backtrace: 18 (primitive-load "/home/ruther/.setup/./target/guix/bin/=E2=80= =A6") In guix/ui.scm: 2369:7 17 (run-guix . _) 2332:10 16 (run-guix-command _ . _) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1752:10 15 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) In guix/status.scm: 859:3 14 (_) 839:4 13 (call-with-status-report _ _) In guix/scripts/home.scm: 547:4 12 (_) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1752:10 11 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) In guix/store.scm: 690:37 10 (thunk) 1331:8 9 (call-with-build-handler _ _) 1331:8 8 (call-with-build-handler _ _) 1331:8 7 (call-with-build-handler # =E2=80=A6) 2212:25 6 (run-with-store # =E2= =80=A6) In guix/scripts/home.scm: 465:14 5 (_ _) In gnu/system/linux-container.scm: 349:17 4 (_ _) In gnu/build/linux-container.scm: 485:7 3 (call-with-container _ _ #:namespaces _ #:host-uids _ # =E2=80= =A6) In unknown file: 2 (waitpid #f #) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1685:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception: Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #f =CE=B861=C2=B0 [ruther:~/.setup] main(+68/-13)* 58s 1 =C2=B1=20 > ./target/guix/bin/guix describe=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 guix 300d29e repository URL: https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-mirror branch: master commit: 300d29e69988caf23684f08effa51f621c7ec083 nonguix 1940698 repository URL: https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix branch: master commit: 19406981a9bf9d0b140180f1f3008cb91f716b4b ruther 1a49e47 repository URL: https://git.ditigal.xyz/~ruther/guix-exprs branch: main commit: 1a49e4760bd922237532fa2eee44bc9e1fe42399 rde bf8f628 repository URL: https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde branch: master commit: bf8f628c4deb9acc94e261db80d301048ea1f0a2 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > This is on Guix System, right? Yes > > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:55:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 11:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 78356 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Rutherther Cc: 78356@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 78356-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B78356.174705102531996 (code B ref 78356); Mon, 12 May 2025 11:58:02 +0000 Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2025 11:57:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50942 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uERmK-0008K0-JH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 07:57:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57300) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uERmI-0008J9-CH for 78356@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 07:57:02 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uERmB-0007m7-VJ; Mon, 12 May 2025 07:56:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=sNY3vJ6fjoNX6iI0Cp6j8iyu3IdjGw/N0NPb2sAa1UA=; b=itYlZIUnzia5J9rH3yW0 eO8VaxmuaVFUTHlrDDp9P5AkBviWdJXoYHJaeuwzRWmpPwpdQ1BQitiSoeuPkf7kkgSXrxx08VyZO ER6zI3fv/ZIQqUrplxcg8aNqwdJxj3KgUhiy6yx4WbpGQLqj7fymET5HiiyQa4Szl75ips1bPs5kQ hA8EVQCiqtllv9IWK0L/YFVegWSD6qVt4UOteN/Y+AOhwVnyEM6DHIYlhZyaC3JPCPTOp1bKx9bYg Y1ft5gdBJ0AwjBtSKTTAZP0SGmiGaFsPk2VYknPJq+sYOhcQZpGDJy9/GZGMo90g5A55VGEOlKGv8 Mff1CwQWaPk1kg==; From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: <87ecwuazr0.fsf@ditigal.xyz> (rutherther@ditigal.xyz's message of "Mon, 12 May 2025 12:29:23 +0200") References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> <871psuxk96.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@gnu.org> <87ecwuazr0.fsf@ditigal.xyz> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4 X-URL: https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu X-Revolutionary-Date: Tridi 23 =?UTF-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 233 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution,?= jour de la Bourrache Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 13:43:57 +0200 Message-ID: <874ixq2gw2.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) Hi, Rutherther writes: > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > [ruther:~/.setup] main(+68/-13)* 15s =C2=B1=20 >> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-conf= iguration.scm=20 > guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home channels-emacs)': > no code for module (ruther home channels-emacs) > ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm:1:0: warning: module name (channels) does = not match file name 'ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' > hint: File `./home/modules/ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' should probabl= y start with: > > (define-module (ruther home channels-emacs)) > > guix home: warning: ambiguous package specification `font-ubuntu' > guix home: warning: choosing font-ubuntu@0.83 from ruther/home/fonts.scm:= 8:2 > guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument Is this from within a container? Does =E2=80=98guix shell -C coreutils=E2=80=99 work? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:55:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers Resent-From: Rutherther Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 12:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 78356 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 78356@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 78356-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B78356.17470531827197 (code B ref 78356); Mon, 12 May 2025 12:34:02 +0000 Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2025 12:33:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51147 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uESL7-0001rm-GB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 08:33:02 -0400 Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::]:43918 helo=mail.ditigal.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uESL3-0001r7-1e for 78356@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 08:32:58 -0400 Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 845cbb2e (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Mon, 12 May 2025 12:32:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Rutherther In-Reply-To: <874ixq2gw2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> <871psuxk96.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@gnu.org> <87ecwuazr0.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <874ixq2gw2.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 14:32:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87a57iau1c.fsf@ditigal.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz; i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1747053169; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=feSWfzr+yFY808grvdjdc7IfKIKehHqkV2nRb53asaM=; b=namaDEI012wEqCnC2CaQilQItMndRB/WaNUcb9ernZ4oO7CV2KAuPMtfbCRQC5ebgyvxU O0iddq/8uN7lcHf4gvMi2Bra6T26L6iFDFQfhiH3E6i5e8JX77h+RVhxiVkRxkMRIeDnYBw MICfZuGSMawHJQbzJZ0++w+R5cqX9vA= X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther writes: > >> --88--- >> [ruther:~/.setup] main(+68/-13)* 15s =?UTF-8?Q?=C2=B1?= >>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther writes: > >> --88--- >> [ruther:~/.setup] main(+68/-13)* 15s =?UTF-8?Q?=C2=B1?= >>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther writes: > >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> [ruther:~/.setup] main(+68/-13)* 15s =C2=B1=20 >>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-con= figuration.scm=20 >> guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home channels-emacs)': >> no code for module (ruther home channels-emacs) >> ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm:1:0: warning: module name (channels) does= not match file name 'ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' >> hint: File `./home/modules/ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' should probab= ly start with: >> >> (define-module (ruther home channels-emacs)) >> >> guix home: warning: ambiguous package specification `font-ubuntu' >> guix home: warning: choosing font-ubuntu@0.83 from ruther/home/fonts.scm= :8:2 >> guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument > > Is this from within a container? No. > > Does =E2=80=98guix shell -C coreutils=E2=80=99 work? Yes, shell containers work fine for me, it was just home and system where I saw an issue. As I pointed out earlier the home container in guix source tree works for me. So it's triggered by something in my home setup. >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- [ruther:~/doc/projects/git_clones/guix] issue/78308(9)* 130 =C2=B1 > ~/.setup/target/guix/bin/guix home container doc/he-config-bare-bones.scm= =20 substitute: looking for substitutes on 'https://substitutes.nonguix.org'...= 100.0% substitute: looking for substitutes on 'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... 1= 00.0% substitute: looking for substitutes on 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% The following derivations will be built: /gnu/store/1d031p7xkmhhcjw4qqs0cwhfh8p004q7-shepherd-timer.scm.drv /gnu/store/54csgxblx2i5c8r03ywxpda1wv8blz61-shepherd-transient.scm.drv /gnu/store/k8s4j84qrly49hd1adihjcq106hx0a6c-shepherd-log-rotation.scm.drv /gnu/store/ni8rlk32hbr7s6gyps0dr0lfy7g9c5dl-shepherd.conf.drv /gnu/store/4khnkn4rab0p6vv9h99n9yfmk2lm1jwj-on-first-login.drv /gnu/store/6as6qxw72lcr90gml6wk8mjib5rj8j87-files.drv /gnu/store/as14p3xl0n3hgxi5lac7w0gdcjilbr2g-provenance.drv /gnu/store/dqlgr0jg3kiyzbbc4pmd9vk188sl3kh1-activate.drv /gnu/store/nkhmbvy8hkwkafb7fq1f14by0mrnd046-home.drv building /gnu/store/as14p3xl0n3hgxi5lac7w0gdcjilbr2g-provenance.drv... building /gnu/store/k8s4j84qrly49hd1adihjcq106hx0a6c-shepherd-log-rotation.= scm.drv... building /gnu/store/1d031p7xkmhhcjw4qqs0cwhfh8p004q7-shepherd-timer.scm.drv= ... building /gnu/store/54csgxblx2i5c8r03ywxpda1wv8blz61-shepherd-transient.scm= .drv... building /gnu/store/ni8rlk32hbr7s6gyps0dr0lfy7g9c5dl-shepherd.conf.drv... building /gnu/store/dqlgr0jg3kiyzbbc4pmd9vk188sl3kh1-activate.drv... building /gnu/store/6as6qxw72lcr90gml6wk8mjib5rj8j87-files.drv... building /gnu/store/4khnkn4rab0p6vv9h99n9yfmk2lm1jwj-on-first-login.drv... building /gnu/store/nkhmbvy8hkwkafb7fq1f14by0mrnd046-home.drv... WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides core bi= nding `delete' WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides core bi= nding `delete' Symlinking /home/ruther/.bash_profile -> /gnu/store/gghay5fzpad5w7082nnk6z9= lj7q00drv-bash_profile... done Symlinking /home/ruther/.profile -> /gnu/store/vvxqfhlkpi90bgmfh1b03kkwfq7p= mfkk-shell-profile... done Symlinking /home/ruther/.bashrc -> /gnu/store/b9ppn0jdrda5h88mw5x35m2jvms8i= zw6-bashrc... done Symlinking /home/ruther/.config/test.conf -> /gnu/store/i8wsnvh1q8lbgyf50va= pfsn2rfj7a2nc-tmp-file.txt... done Symlinking /home/ruther/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf -> /gnu/store/mw4clgk= wj3rvlnfv0gd694aabvamr0sa-fonts.conf... done Symlinking /home/ruther/.config/shepherd/init.scm -> /gnu/store/ysg5icpanci= cn1hi2gfd1q3xvmmgb8lf-shepherd.conf... done done Finished updating symlinks. Comparing /gnu/store/non-existing-generation/profile/share/fonts and /gnu/store/84kwxidarhpibps26xyqbdpj5lfk1s37-home/profile/share/fo= nts... done (same) Evaluating on-change gexps. On-change gexps evaluation finished. This is the Z Shell configuration function for new users, zsh-newuser-install. You are seeing this message because you have no zsh startup files (the files .zshenv, .zprofile, .zshrc, .zlogin in the directory ~). This function can help you with a few settings that should make your use of the shell easier. You can: (q) Quit and do nothing. The function will be run again next time. (0) Exit, creating the file ~/.zshrc containing just a comment. That will prevent this function being run again. (1) Continue to the main menu. --- Type one of the keys in parentheses --- 0 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:55:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers Resent-From: Rutherther Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 12:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 78356 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 78356@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 78356-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B78356.174705396910149 (code B ref 78356); Mon, 12 May 2025 12:47:02 +0000 Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2025 12:46:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51227 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uESXo-0002dc-P6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 08:46:09 -0400 Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::]:39052 helo=mail.ditigal.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uESXi-0002ca-8J for 78356@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 08:46:03 -0400 Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a080c6c5 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Mon, 12 May 2025 12:45:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Rutherther In-Reply-To: <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 14:45:53 +0200 Message-ID: <877c2matfi.fsf@ditigal.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz; i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1747053955; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=50rJTE1T2m0DaQkLiXaAWXeL1N4wOCu8im4dm2tTFl0=; b=bUFMUlkgUVxEXjVQc9we1Xs+N6Goa65+aZd4lLqLXpfYjx8glrejbOcdzmMjffvmmYAkW b+Y2248IbS2EcQLqFnIsWrLzUx8+cyH8WDbCHqTZAshOLF+sl1696h0XGVTEO6QqrMu2fYv Yzro0eQZeNG21SVsFbRu2uPAEwFEK1k= X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther writes: >> Here are the backtraces: >> guix system: > > Fixed in 437bb9ece55f37d4b5a62cafc98c0c3b848a53ce. Confirmed. Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther writes: >> Here are the backtraces: >> guix system: > > Fixed in 437bb9ece55f37d4b5a62cafc98c0c3b848a53ce. Confirmed. Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther writes: >> Here are the backtraces: >> guix system: > > Fixed in 437bb9ece55f37d4b5a62cafc98c0c3b848a53ce. Confirmed. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:55:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 15:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 78356 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Rutherther Cc: 78356@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 78356-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B78356.174714976815306 (code B ref 78356); Tue, 13 May 2025 15:23:02 +0000 Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2025 15:22:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60970 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uErSw-0003yl-O1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2025 11:22:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uErSt-0003yT-2s for 78356@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2025 11:22:44 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uErSn-0005pf-Bb; Tue, 13 May 2025 11:22:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=hA39Mg4Dj2dsre4pqc9RWQ3TqzOyeOa5tSBMZzr68yg=; b=Mh1iU1Qu+CHAkqY2F3Ir 0rM9adCpDbZR46DgDEPDojCxZgBuuR7k41EehPEl29Oxom/VysDqFWeAdH8nv5LVeJlSREbBUFBCt pqhc3/Uo0kC7iQlZbBzEYJ2zXedeE+ZEDCy0h1w7cLUOmpTn38tppRKoijpTb9SbVl3EgMe+pe6sX jNtGnePNVTRZ0o5hTgGA3d2i5eiKk1fAabjc5Gtwl46nALl2dv0+J+kF9dJkP7KHUshI6kTTbVsUW qjQzjI3dQRdavRJMCWNGCBuHHHMhK4/fBIuG1uCeFwmHvK3aX5ScNVa8pX+5uWukqxfiDNMb1RfWq vPje+dMzxtb7Ow==; From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: <87ecwuazr0.fsf@ditigal.xyz> (rutherther@ditigal.xyz's message of "Mon, 12 May 2025 12:29:23 +0200") References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> <871psuxk96.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@gnu.org> <87ecwuazr0.fsf@ditigal.xyz> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4 X-URL: https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu X-Revolutionary-Date: Quartidi 24 =?UTF-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 233 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution,?= jour de la =?UTF-8?Q?Val=C3=A9riane?= Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 17:21:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87bjrwv8n0.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) Hi, Rutherther skribis: >> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-conf= iguration.scm=20 > guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home channels-emacs)': > no code for module (ruther home channels-emacs) > ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm:1:0: warning: module name (channels) does = not match file name 'ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' > hint: File `./home/modules/ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' should probabl= y start with: > > (define-module (ruther home channels-emacs)) > > guix home: warning: ambiguous package specification `font-ubuntu' > guix home: warning: choosing font-ubuntu@0.83 from ruther/home/fonts.scm:= 8:2 > guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument What=E2=80=99s weird is that this seems to happen even before activation. I cannot audit the whole thing but apparently something in the config tries to connect to the outside: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- 8--- Probably use of =E2=80=98current-guix=E2=80=99? Anyway, do you think you could boil it down to a minimal reproducer? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:55:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers Resent-From: Rutherther Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 17:34:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 78356 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 78356@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 78356-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B78356.174715759620753 (code B ref 78356); Tue, 13 May 2025 17:34:03 +0000 Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2025 17:33:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33089 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uEtVD-0005Oe-ST for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2025 13:33:16 -0400 Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::]:57526 helo=mail.ditigal.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uEtVA-0005N4-NM for 78356@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2025 13:33:13 -0400 Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 58c67b08 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Tue, 13 May 2025 17:33:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Rutherther In-Reply-To: <87bjrwv8n0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> <871psuxk96.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@gnu.org> <87ecwuazr0.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87bjrwv8n0.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 19:33:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87r00sh0vk.fsf@ditigal.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz; i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1747157585; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=yzt6Y705sqvyDkNxF0cbI52GlQ7tczQivHdeLqW6P9o=; b=PV0Mv4jte9buzpPLcfqx+uywWjrUTZCI1iPp6PcpCm34wauSuIjyjA0w0zoRd/REPf7Wq aUhaqKiwDrRq5xgnI/akjgx4woVrCJD62vJWTYOH2FClygCHc4KLCa31Ea2HhuTwYU6j8T/ +cCDorfp75ZLycFkMhkyxueRNH1gvvg= X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther skribis: > >>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-configuration.scm >> guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home c [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther skribis: > >>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-configuration.scm >> guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home c [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther skribis: > >>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-con= figuration.scm=20 >> guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home channels-emacs)': >> no code for module (ruther home channels-emacs) >> ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm:1:0: warning: module name (channels) does= not match file name 'ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' >> hint: File `./home/modules/ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' should probab= ly start with: >> >> (define-module (ruther home channels-emacs)) >> >> guix home: warning: ambiguous package specification `font-ubuntu' >> guix home: warning: choosing font-ubuntu@0.83 from ruther/home/fonts.scm= :8:2 >> guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument > > What=E2=80=99s weird is that this seems to happen even before activation. > > I cannot audit the whole thing but apparently something in the config > tries to connect to the outside: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://codeberg.org/guix= /guix-mirror'... > guix home: error: failed to load 'home/home-configuration.scm': > web/client.scm:338:10: In procedure open-socket-for-uri: > In procedure getaddrinfo: Servname not supported for ai_socktype > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- So this is after the build? I have added inferiors recently for using Emacs 30, that would explain it before build, but after build I am clueless why that would happen. Though if it's before build, I am surprised you got an error like that, unless you were purposefully in environment without network. I added the inferiors just yesterday, commit 819ee341ab6bcc9846b099572af185c781b82a1d shouldn't be downloading anything. > > Probably use of =E2=80=98current-guix=E2=80=99? > > Anyway, do you think you could boil it down to a minimal reproducer? I will definitely try to, but probably not today, in a few days, hopefully by the end of the week. > > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:55:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 21:52:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 78356 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Rutherther Cc: 78356@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 78356-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B78356.174717308231751 (code B ref 78356); Tue, 13 May 2025 21:52:03 +0000 Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2025 21:51:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35520 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uExX0-0008G3-4L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2025 17:51:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38126) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uExWw-0008Fa-Ra for 78356@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2025 17:51:19 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uExWr-0004Ng-7c; Tue, 13 May 2025 17:51:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=SZNLYRMstqadXbAGWGYvTeZPTk8iACOjWUYd8shVEew=; b=qOGqqADiv8vkEwzICIvz fwFav95190SpZD1KcxFlHtPSM6p5QcQpgVu9dyvbeUfyBMDb6V6Z1BMH8/R3iXr/DNzNTJ5cRQzJU P3YZnl9Cv9CA71khDKLETmdZJtQpoxinwWL6561mGGLy5uwCTJBiRyf8Sc6IFYL+IqgDZSJkedEPM QcKxiNS/Wej66cxulJ1v6CET49tFZVkeaLNuVdfdl0szVj7W9Z5Zxi/G3L+2oGWFmMBo28lIwFWUq JGztG7qasWmd6PuR4HEodOx/Eqdj5IqMWfuPQVmV0zWm3TR8EwUP2zcMwtr7MaQNkZpbuvVSMJqAp 7g5ara21BQzVWQ==; From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: <87r00sh0vk.fsf@ditigal.xyz> (rutherther@ditigal.xyz's message of "Tue, 13 May 2025 19:33:03 +0200") References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> <871psuxk96.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@gnu.org> <87ecwuazr0.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87bjrwv8n0.fsf@gnu.org> <87r00sh0vk.fsf@ditigal.xyz> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4 X-URL: https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu X-Revolutionary-Date: Quartidi 24 =?UTF-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 233 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution,?= jour de la =?UTF-8?Q?Val=C3=A9riane?= Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 23:42:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87ikm4428k.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) Hi, Rutherther writes: >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> > Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://codeberg.org/gui= x/guix-mirror'... >> guix home: error: failed to load 'home/home-configuration.scm': >> web/client.scm:338:10: In procedure open-socket-for-uri: >> In procedure getaddrinfo: Servname not supported for ai_socktype >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > So this is after the build? I have added inferiors recently for using > Emacs 30, that would explain it before build, but after build I am > clueless why that would happen. Though if it's before build, I am > surprised you got an error like that, unless you were purposefully in > environment without network. I added the inferiors just yesterday, > commit 819ee341ab6bcc9846b099572af185c781b82a1d shouldn't be downloading > anything. Yes, I was running it in =E2=80=98guix shell -CW=E2=80=99. Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:55:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 06:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 78356 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Rutherther , 78356@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 78356-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B78356.174729032226944 (code B ref 78356); Thu, 15 May 2025 06:26:01 +0000 Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2025 06:25:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50173 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uFS1x-00070V-Rn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2025 02:25:22 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::102c]:50259) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uFS1u-0006xx-3O for 78356@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2025 02:25:19 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-x102c.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3081f72c271so532451a91.0 for <78356@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 14 May 2025 23:25:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1747290311; x=1747895111; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=FsZJDBx8/TmB1H9kGHXDK2FbfWCzSDqjz2I1u5CaboQ=; b=Ssn9sKWz1WJxM+jOjIkBIPGRXTk/6A1ssjcLDXMtiYuOl4f1y0OZcW1d1gjTsfLvAn Sd9ssJf1L1LhNwIaF4fjLng/O7WKEcKSsTHMNNADuNbi2LPDNU1XBGS3gaQ74Ih6Oj7N PL+gGG8LRdBHreM+4qNM39Fvf72QtPyCqz9Hw3RvFZeYaZ58TMaCs890UG7s1nrQVbZO AzOgSaeE79AeLWwTTDosk9YKO6zr91mb7ZsHDWI13tRPHHo1Aq8FDDTedglsRylgmISL rEMO+X0tDv0CCKqnexiXHv71gp3kCtYM4G3h0BCp322c/ls3W44FBWhHFWqTmn2NiejE az5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1747290311; x=1747895111; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FsZJDBx8/TmB1H9kGHXDK2FbfWCzSDqjz2I1u5CaboQ=; b=UgBTtXDcb5N02CM309NwSMa2sl4D6Sbc0MulFPkP6phJeeDlVTol0hgUxb62YoZtVf V0iqRklP71G4PJ/k8oRsgFOXXycXPJk3ulgGWSF7RcqkomdRfxAhA3yGQSnkWO5oxsEV 6sqtCCpHhmMjaE+F3BI0hndMruCXfALSneBfGR3baSQAtjTeNeg5vRzhNMJoTb7TB1Q9 Ya0iWVPvC0/I+ez6PIAI6iaokSVAZV9cCh0OxSKRNveWK/2Wi/EO8Y5GNXy0wbvaSvS5 fWBgUD77EUoNVTeztpB8gxqByqF3dwNLm0rmG3RnZRgbGVVa9ncGtX1HaU5jFOPw/kt0 dDLA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWyUF7pACiw6WXUtLDuo3Pivlt68nas4zHGZxQKdBEfFlA8Dz3/8iqqGhTOMSA0xJA3JlhdLg==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyhZ6COkusNWEpij8oazJSvObJ6MFzr2yV9BmjDDoTft4UxtreJ fPAWsws5PnJ34ujrgKk7VsdF+/paTiC0Hb19PfXuh600b63yGRqWIap1PSdJ X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv6WXlzV/KO0JZXfwgsTe8o+NoaXdiBIp2l6dmiQf8PxKrqYaRAdCR0KOvRzCS j4tkC5hKEVDECQK425q8fK/J/uyY/wzKjBRwdsecMH0e2DxFKKElLrOK1wRuXSuPt5aWzWIunN1 MZxEzIoyLMl+xvGyHN2ThN+NUafTVAXN5E9DNu/OZNJ+C6fpZSy8D+Hxf8b2QQlwXoGoy63luCF cm3a6YEo+XLNB8nNIQdow7QX2p0wVPid6v/mvo7cOsp0VCcm0/LZoTAIqoffiSj+GGh21Cioz5R J9vKLljcPSsCUAR5onOu9ACnGLzsipCJ+PcYvht5p2eerpqetwElopzcIqfj X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEj6qkgWShZQPmLyWkq0nGkP+sth6QgkFuugplzsvYqnO+isWQXsLmvkHanMPb9TbiFlg/FbQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:17c1:b0:2ee:9b09:7d3d with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-30e51786009mr1990008a91.19.1747290310944; Wed, 14 May 2025 23:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from terra ([2405:6586:be0:0:83c8:d31d:2cec:f542]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-30e3347fdddsm2710810a91.33.2025.05.14.23.25.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 May 2025 23:25:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer In-Reply-To: <87bjrwv8n0.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Tue, 13 May 2025 17:21:39 +0200") References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> <871psuxk96.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@gnu.org> <87ecwuazr0.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87bjrwv8n0.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 15:25:07 +0900 Message-ID: <87zffeie64.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther skribis: > >>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-configuration.scm >> guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home channels-emacs)': >> no [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (maxim.cournoyer[at]gmail.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2607:f8b0:4864:20:0:0:0:102c listed in] [list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hi, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther skribis: > >>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-con= figuration.scm=20 >> guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home channels-emacs)': >> no code for module (ruther home channels-emacs) >> ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm:1:0: warning: module name (channels) does= not match file name 'ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' >> hint: File `./home/modules/ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' should probab= ly start with: >> >> (define-module (ruther home channels-emacs)) >> >> guix home: warning: ambiguous package specification `font-ubuntu' >> guix home: warning: choosing font-ubuntu@0.83 from ruther/home/fonts.scm= :8:2 >> guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument > > What=E2=80=99s weird is that this seems to happen even before activation. > > I cannot audit the whole thing but apparently something in the config > tries to connect to the outside: > > Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://codeberg.org/guix= /guix-mirror'... > guix home: error: failed to load 'home/home-configuration.scm': > web/client.scm:338:10: In procedure open-socket-for-uri: > In procedure getaddrinfo: Servname not supported for ai_socktype > > Probably use of =E2=80=98current-guix=E2=80=99? > > Anyway, do you think you could boil it down to a minimal reproducer? Not sure how minimal that is, but I can trigger this in the readymedia system test: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- make check-system TESTS=3Dreadymedia --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- It may not fail every time (?). In the VM, in /var/log/readymedia/minidlna.log, we can read: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- 2025-05-15 08:22:27 In gnu/build/linux-container.scm: ...skipping... 2025-05-15 08:22:27 476:16 3 (_ "/tmp/guix-directory.w1REZ6") 2025-05-15 08:22:27 62:6 2 (call-with-clean-exit #) 2025-05-15 08:22:27 321:20 1 (_) 2025-05-15 08:22:27 In guix/build/syscalls.scm: 2025-05-15 08:22:27 1231:10 0 (_ 268566528) 2025-05-15 08:22:27=20 2025-05-15 08:22:27 guix/build/syscalls.scm:1231:10: In procedure unshare: = 268566528: Invalid argument 2025-05-15 08:22:28 Backtrace: 2025-05-15 08:22:28 4 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/4h68sswscz96wk= 47724bfqfrq9n?") 2025-05-15 08:22:28 In ice-9/eval.scm: 2025-05-15 08:22:28 191:35 3 (_ _) 2025-05-15 08:22:28 In gnu/build/linux-container.scm: 2025-05-15 08:22:28 368:8 2 (call-with-temporary-directory #) 2025-05-15 08:22:28 485:7 1 (_ "/tmp/guix-directory.w1REZ6") 2025-05-15 08:22:28 In unknown file: 2025-05-15 08:22:28 0 (waitpid #f #) 2025-05-15 08:22:28=20 2025-05-15 08:22:28 ERROR: In procedure waitpid: 2025-05-15 08:22:28 Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #f --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The service uses least-authority-wrapper. --=20 Thanks, Maxim From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:55:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 08:34:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 78356 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: Rutherther , 78356@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 78356-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B78356.174729802221900 (code B ref 78356); Thu, 15 May 2025 08:34:03 +0000 Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2025 08:33:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50889 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uFU26-0005gj-VT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2025 04:33:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56660) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uFU1m-0005dX-Jn for 78356@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2025 04:33:19 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uFU1h-000480-5L; Thu, 15 May 2025 04:33:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=sOCxw/3L4klUBAbEfCWcJ3N7xN4oOdij0QBSscIyHlM=; b=cidTG1oYQ7Z5PuSon6vQ dJJzQvYuqfjS2b5q0ySmcjNyU8bZ2dGLALTWt7FY5ZPr9k7/+5ibv9yLZlA7Rs/RXeXOvBoSS+QBe t33rs8AjB7BiSfhG7cn8npY5VZ4uuStSO34e1zZf9FHgetc8GaRxRb7V1mth9Gy8lLpL2q7yXh209 g3DgJWhVJE4SKRg/GN7/yVnT/Ts14M8LlYlq6+sY0EGbnxgSOhKh5MxGwVvtYID9OrzQQk43JRrjE JMFxtGmDbBmCQIDJFlRPv6L97+TzHKdG0S/sQVeA78iJy6pBNGL7CvAaTEJwdnxZlrvoRe8J8wD0l kTxId1Klnv9OAw==; From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: <87zffeie64.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Thu, 15 May 2025 15:25:07 +0900") References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> <871psuxk96.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@gnu.org> <87ecwuazr0.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87bjrwv8n0.fsf@gnu.org> <87zffeie64.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4 X-URL: https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu X-Revolutionary-Date: Sextidi 26 =?UTF-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 233 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution,?= jour du Fusain Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 10:29:08 +0200 Message-ID: <875xi2xoob.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Not sure how minimal that is, but I can trigger this in the readymedia > system test: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > make check-system TESTS=3Dreadymedia > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > It may not fail every time (?). In the VM, in > /var/log/readymedia/minidlna.log, we can read: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > 2025-05-15 08:22:27 In gnu/build/linux-container.scm: > ...skipping... > 2025-05-15 08:22:27 476:16 3 (_ "/tmp/guix-directory.w1REZ6") > 2025-05-15 08:22:27 62:6 2 (call-with-clean-exit #) > 2025-05-15 08:22:27 321:20 1 (_) > 2025-05-15 08:22:27 In guix/build/syscalls.scm: > 2025-05-15 08:22:27 1231:10 0 (_ 268566528) > 2025-05-15 08:22:27=20 > 2025-05-15 08:22:27 guix/build/syscalls.scm:1231:10: In procedure unshare= : 268566528: Invalid argument > 2025-05-15 08:22:28 Backtrace: > 2025-05-15 08:22:28 4 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/4h68sswscz96= wk47724bfqfrq9n?") > 2025-05-15 08:22:28 In ice-9/eval.scm: > 2025-05-15 08:22:28 191:35 3 (_ _) > 2025-05-15 08:22:28 In gnu/build/linux-container.scm: > 2025-05-15 08:22:28 368:8 2 (call-with-temporary-directory #) > 2025-05-15 08:22:28 485:7 1 (_ "/tmp/guix-directory.w1REZ6") > 2025-05-15 08:22:28 In unknown file: > 2025-05-15 08:22:28 0 (waitpid #f #) > 2025-05-15 08:22:28=20 > 2025-05-15 08:22:28 ERROR: In procedure waitpid: > 2025-05-15 08:22:28 Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #f > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > The service uses least-authority-wrapper. Damnit. =E2=80=9Cmake check-system TESTS=3Dbitlbee=E2=80=9D pass though (a= lso using =E2=80=98least-authority-wrapper=E2=80=99) and I don=E2=80=99t see any sign= ificant difference between the two? Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:55:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers Resent-From: hiecaq Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 02:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 78356 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 78356@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Rutherther Received: via spool by 78356-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B78356.17475341216301 (code B ref 78356); Sun, 18 May 2025 02:09:01 +0000 Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2025 02:08:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52883 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uGTSC-0001dV-6f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2025 22:08:40 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f169.google.com ([209.85.167.169]:50283) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uGTS3-0001cq-5o for 78356@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2025 22:08:36 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f169.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-4034118aeb7so1097129b6e.0 for <78356@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 17 May 2025 19:08:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1747534105; x=1748138905; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=e/Q398LKpZNyUm5QkNv3oxT4eVGXtS3OYWwCtzg/wy8=; b=cp1KFLKo8jzU3IcahGRmR/WpABPhkeXk3eE/E/bAXHO3z8ji5r/34vLaVWI5AVwb1n 7rehV2DyrgOxFlyfKS7V8xDRl4wc/e1vWvWK5Vnr8+ERtwPxfO8ZZwOj6D/A+CbrT0gd iUJ47F6y0Jjw4yW+mePJNUwEp1Mj3h2R3tN3cfB/kpmsqs7fAfXw32Bg05ovPPi5ZKiD hSpyGSIvWZ4D8pympI35L8TogU7/+zYIYb0fKIiedTka8MBEgCW7sMEJJYs60BIEArUC hUTAwKgLysVcNs319CRqRaxFKtUL9qlGD1K/fQDFT6hjL7Y9dMHhSDLDZkOpJs2FKr2G EYrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwmRe8iS8fQlYaucU1U8mN2halK7iIrHhyzwfDxoTYnTa5fXMCK 2qJm3G6P020eY/YvpA3RWor21FftEyJVFOUjLs5K03AJNpk030nV/ZVykcK9LSQ1 X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctvPPJXkqU7iDfv9XftWebuOm5ZuE0v2edybgUGToWEoqK8wadU6cgF3SRL1jt kpW7XiykQJ5uzTV/8U/pOJ9+xHuerk0e1kCGjcwJjE2PlyVQ+CdeoJZq0+61e7wOUaMAuQUANwZ K4bX5aymcl/2PglrtQcTIZEBiGM5BdJ2dNve+i4FpvGIiliuuIblD2/5u2mL1BhychxZ++yAlvo IgPH5pMOIyxCJeDdIT3GdH1cU+o/bYmLDmzUGud0dH+4rAKJqh+OLlf9NZaDcSp+Ne2wCzGcHli Tib92G1NA3WeZzOBKAD4olMOInH0nwcC2c5lam//qkXe X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF2esdA6frAmGpvdqWfdZmoRFvGUFlnPLNHlg5Oa3xz+jku+K0JAdRpH9jn9VfSwQG6pBKSMw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:6083:b0:731:d108:c4c3 with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-734f998ca6dmr5276618a34.25.1747534104866; Sat, 17 May 2025 19:08:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([180.158.149.128]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 46e09a7af769-734f6a4b1desm935301a34.1.2025.05.17.19.08.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 17 May 2025 19:08:24 -0700 (PDT) From: hiecaq In-Reply-To: <871psuxk96.fsf@ditigal.xyz> (Rutherther via Bug reports for's message of "Mon, 12 May 2025 11:15:33 +0200") References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> <871psuxk96.fsf@ditigal.xyz> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 30.0.92 Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 10:08:17 +0800 Message-ID: <87sel2hdri.fsf@hiecaq.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Rutherther via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > Hi Ludo > > Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= writes: >> >> What command did you run, precisely? I cannot experience it: > > For home, I tried my own config, and since I was pretty sure any > system > [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [209.85.167.169 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [209.85.167.169 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.167.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.167.169 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hiecaq.u[at]gmail.com) 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: git.ditigal.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hi, Rutherther via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > Hi Ludo > > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> >> What command did you run, precisely? I cannot experience it: > > For home, I tried my own config, and since I was pretty sure any=20 > system > container is affected (tried a simple one, my one and I know one=20 > other > person reported this in Matrix channel), I didn't try anything=20 > simpler > and just assumed all homes are going to be affected as well. > Now trying simpler config you mentioned, that one works fine. > > The command was `guix home container -L ./home/modules=20 > ./home/home-container.scm` > in my repository. It's here=20 > https://git.ditigal.xyz/~ruther/guix-config. > Any idea what service could cause this behavior with=20 > lock-mounts? Would > be good to isolate it, but I am not sure where to start. > > Here is the unshare error I was talking about earlier: >> guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument > Now I am getting it consistently, before it was missing=20 > sometimes. > Currently on > ``` >> ./target/guix/bin/guix describe > guix 300d29e > repository URL: https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-mirror > branch: master > commit: 300d29e69988caf23684f08effa51f621c7ec083 > nonguix 1940698 > repository URL: https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix > branch: master > commit: 19406981a9bf9d0b140180f1f3008cb91f716b4b > ruther 1a49e47 > repository URL: https://git.ditigal.xyz/~ruther/guix-exprs > branch: main > commit: 1a49e4760bd922237532fa2eee44bc9e1fe42399 > rde bf8f628 > repository URL: https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde > branch: master > commit: bf8f628c4deb9acc94e261db80d301048ea1f0a2 > ``` > > Thanks > Rutherther I'm getting this "unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument" error just=20 using `guix shell -C -m manifest.scm` when I was trying to develop=20 a local Haskell package today, and I think it might be relevant to=20 this bug. Here is the backtrace: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- guix shell: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument Backtrace: 16 (primitive-load=20 "/home/hiecaq/.config/guix/current/bin/=E2=80=A6") In guix/ui.scm: 2369:7 15 (run-guix . _) 2332:10 14 (run-guix-command _ . _) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1752:10 13 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) In guix/status.scm: 839:4 12 (call-with-status-report _ _) In guix/store.scm: 703:3 11 (_) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1752:10 10 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) In guix/store.scm: 690:37 9 (thunk) 1331:8 8 (call-with-build-handler _ _) 1331:8 7 (call-with-build-handler # =E2=80=A6) In guix/scripts/environment.scm: 1184:11 6 (proc _) In guix/store.scm: 2212:25 5 (run-with-store # =E2=80=A6) In guix/scripts/environment.scm: 898:8 4 (_ _) In gnu/build/linux-container.scm: 485:7 3 (call-with-container _ _ #:namespaces _ #:host-uids _=20 # =E2=80=A6) In unknown file: 2 (waitpid #f #) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1685:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception: Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #f --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Here is my manifest: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (use-modules (guix) (guix build-system haskell) (guix git-download) ((guix licenses) #:prefix license:) (gnu packages) (gnu packages xorg) ;; for libxpm (gnu packages wm) ;; for ghc-xmobar (gnu packages haskell) (gnu packages haskell-apps)) (specifications->manifest (list "ghc-xmobar" "ghc" "gcc-toolchain" "libxpm")) (define %source-dir (dirname (current-filename))) (define xmobar-hiecaq (package (name "xmobar-hiecaq") (version "0.0.1") (source (local-file %source-dir #:recursive? #t #:select? (git-predicate %source-dir))) (build-system haskell-build-system) (inputs (list ghc-xmobar libxpm)) (home-page "") (synopsis "") (description "") (license license:gpl3+))) (concatenate-manifests (list (specifications->manifest (list "coreutils" "git" "which")) (packages->manifest (list cabal-install)) (package->development-manifest xmobar-hiecaq))) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- What I did is basically the following things in order (I believe=20 only the manifest is needed to reproduce): 1. `guix shell -C -m manifest.scm` 2. then I attempted `cabal build` but I realized that now I need=20 writable root. So 3. I quit the current shell and then `guix shell -C -m=20 manifest.scm --writable-root`, it failed with the above error. 4. After that, `guix shell -C -m manifest.scm` also failed, but if=20 I kept retrying sometimes it succeeded. With `--writable-root` it=20 failed consistently. Output of `guix describe`: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Generation 26 May 17 2025 09:41:21 (current) nonguix e4459f4 repository URL: https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix branch: master commit: e4459f4802e8b222eec55196d44c25dc7a5bc53b guix 6465931 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 6465931bbc118d4ed9da652b0be74ed844b52b2a --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I had been using Guix at the commit=20 `d505cb960fd1e670be9a66d9fdbad94bc49e891d` before yesterday (so=20 `--writable-root` were not introduced yet) and I had never got any=20 similar error before. I hope my case is reproducible ;) Thanks, hiecaq From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:55:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers Resent-From: Rutherther Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 06:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 78356 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: hiecaq , 78356@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 78356-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B78356.174755148620473 (code B ref 78356); Sun, 18 May 2025 06:59:02 +0000 Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2025 06:58:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54443 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uGXyH-0005K7-Ie for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 May 2025 02:58:05 -0400 Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::]:45132 helo=mail.ditigal.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uGXyE-0005JL-3y for 78356@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 May 2025 02:58:03 -0400 Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 022b78eb (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Sun, 18 May 2025 06:57:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Rutherther In-Reply-To: <87sel2hdri.fsf@hiecaq.org> References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87v7q643bd.fsf@gnu.org> <871psuxk96.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87sel2hdri.fsf@hiecaq.org> Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 08:57:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87jz6e9zin.fsf@ditigal.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz; i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1747551475; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=k+sd00csa17eDDHskZ2163dwzxd4Abvx6dgDciKKo8E=; b=hyTnWA07XLk/EpMune/up9kFWg9fA3yaSZ6zjh8PSeE9lAMc3Jx4DFnzybYgB3FWDS4b+ vAQWhMbpRXsFcllmZ6L+LZ8SU3SRJOt1JXoYz9XHPKqDi5SM9WRuDBHha44BxvRdpmucpvG hnrqvsNzC+IchjrX3XXvxTP9SSlwfoY= X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, hiecaq writes: > > I'm getting this "unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument" error just > using `guix shell -C -m manifest.scm` when I was trying to develop > a local Haskell package today, and I think it might be rel [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, hiecaq writes: > > I'm getting this "unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument" error just > using `guix shell -C -m manifest.scm` when I was trying to develop > a local Haskell package today, and I think it might be rel [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Hi, hiecaq writes: > > I'm getting this "unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument" error just > using `guix shell -C -m manifest.scm` when I was trying to develop > a local Haskell package today, and I think it might be relevant to > this bug. Here is the backtrace: I can confirm I can get this with your manifest as well. But not consistently, I have to rerun the shell container multiple times to get it. Also, from simple trial it seems it's the development inputs of xmobar-hiecaq that cause this. I am not getting the issue when I comment everything else in the manifest. But I haven't tried minimizing this even more to a specific input. Regards Rutherther