Subject: bug#7834: 24.0.50; doc of `put-image'

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:51:09 +0200

Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]> writes:

> This function creates a new object, and that's a good idea to return it.
> The cases to which I'm opposed is when the function returns something
> which the caller knows even before calling the function.

Okidoke.

I'll mark this bug as "pending", since changing the return value of
`put-image' is a new feature (and may possibly break something that
relied on the un-announced old value).

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/