GNU bug report logs - #78263
[PATCH 1/3] Ignore OSC sequences in term instead of printing them

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stéphane Zermatten <szermatt <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Per Bothner <per <at> bothner.com>, Jared Finder <jared <at> finder.org>, 78263 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#78263: [PATCH 1/3] Ignore OSC sequences in term instead of printing them
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 11:35:31 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

+CC 78263 <at> debbugs.gnu.org <mailto:78263 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, Per Bothner <per <at> bothner.com>

I’m sorry I messed up the patch. I thought I had been careful, but not enough 🙁 My workflow needs work. 

I attached a patch that fixes the breaking test on the main branch. The unicode characters hardcoded in the test file were messed up somehow, so in the patch I propose using the \u notation instead of hardcoding “αβ”.



> On 12 Jun 2025, at 10:10, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> 
>> Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 20:59:02 -0700
>> From: Jared Finder <jared <at> finder.org>
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Per Bothner <per <at> bothner.com>,
>> 78263 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> 
>> On 2025-06-06 01:28, Stéphane Zermatten wrote:
>>> I just got confirmation that the copyright assignent paperwork is 
>>> complete.
>>> 
>>> Here’s an updated version of the patch, with:
>>> - 2 sentence formatting fixes
>>> - term-osc-handlers just a defvar instead of a defcustom
>> 
>> This patch looks good to me.
> 
> Thanks, I've now installed it on the master branch.  I needed a
> followup change, though: the definition of term--osc-max-bytes was
> missing from the patch.  In addition, the new test  term-handle-osc
> fails:
> 
>  Test term-handle-osc backtrace:
>    signal(ert-test-failed (((should (equal '(("2" . "αβ")) captured))
>    ert-fail(((should (equal '(("2" . "αβ")) captured)) :form (equal (
>    (if (unwind-protect (setq value-279 (apply fn-277 args-278)) (setq f
>    (let (form-description-281) (if (unwind-protect (setq value-279 (app
>    (let ((value-279 'ert-form-evaluation-aborted-280)) (let (form-descr
>    (let* ((fn-277 #'equal) (args-278 (condition-case err (list '(("2" .
>    (let ((locale-coding-system 'utf-8-unix)) (setq captured nil) (let*
>    (let* ((captured nil) (handler #'(lambda (code text) (setq captured
>    #f(lambda () [term-width term-height t] (let* ((captured nil) (handl
>    #f(compiled-function () #<bytecode -0x180335fbec92162c>)()
>    handler-bind-1(#f(compiled-function () #<bytecode -0x180335fbec92162
>    ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test
>    ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name term-handle-osc :documentation nil :b
>    ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector ... :tests ... :test-m
>    ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :unstable) (tag :nativecomp))) #f(compil
>    ert-run-tests-batch((not (or (tag :unstable) (tag :nativecomp))))
>    ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (or (tag :unstable) (tag :nativeco
>    eval((ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit '(not (or (tag :unstable) (tag :n
>    command-line-1(("-L" ":." "-l" "ert" "--eval" "(setq treesit-extra-l
>    command-line()
>    normal-top-level()
>  Test term-handle-osc condition:
>      (ert-test-failed
>       ((should (equal '(...) captured)) :form
> 	(equal (("2" . "αβ")) (("2" . "αβ"))) :value nil :explanation
> 	(list-elt 0
> 		  (cdr
> 		   (arrays-of-different-length 4 2 "αβ" "αβ"
> 					       first-mismatch-at 0)))))
>     FAILED   7/16  term-handle-osc (0.003910 sec) at lisp/term-tests.el:453
> 
> Stéphane, could you please look at the test failure and tell how to
> fix it?  Or maybe I goofed when I installed your changes (as indicated
> by the problem with term--osc-max-bytes)?

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[0001-Fix-char-encoding-in-term-tests.el.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.