GNU bug report logs - #7824
1.11 doesn't add sources with nonstandard suffixes when making a binary

Previous Next

Package: automake;

Reported by: Юрий Пухальский <aikipooh <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:44:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: wontfix

Merged with 7670

Done: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
To: 7824 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Юрий Пухальский <aikipooh <at> gmail.com>, "ralf.wildenhues" <ralf.wildenhues <at> gmx.de>
Subject: bug#7824: 1.11 doesn't add sources with nonstandard suffixes when making a binary
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:46:39 +0100
Hello Юрий.

On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Юрий Пухальский wrote:
> So i put it all together.
> 
> If i have a Makefile like this:
> -----------------------------
> SUFFIXES = .pc
> 
> .pc.lo:
> 	cp $(srcdir)/$*.pc $(builddir)/$*.c
> 	$(LTCOMPILE) -c $(builddir)/$*.c
> 	rm -f $(builddir)/$*.c
> 
> noinst_PROGRAMS = 1 2
> 
> 1_SOURCES = 1.pc
> 
> db_src = 1.pc
> 2_SOURCES = dummy.c
> 2_LDADD = $(db_src:.pc=.lo)
> -----------------------------
> 1 is not built:
> --------------------------------
> devfe:~/tmp/test>make
> /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc  -g -O2   -o 1
> libtool: link: gcc -g -O2 -o 1
> gcc: no input files
> make: *** [1] Error 1
> --------------------------------
> 
> If i make a rule .pc.c, then i have problem on HP-UX.
> 
> I'd say the first approach is legitimate - i make whatever rule i
> want, i use .pc in SOURCES, and automake should take care of
> everything else, like it's stated in the doc?
> Second approach is ok too - for i don't see any limitation on
> transitive rules in standard.
> 
> On the other hand, putting explicit dependencies in case of makes like
> that on HP-UX could be done in automake. It's cruddy to do it
> manually...
> 
> Can You comment on this?
> 
> PS. If one can use a decent make, there is no need for automake:)))
>
Just a quick note: you might want to take a look at automake bug#7670:
 <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7670>
 <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2010-12/msg00034.html>
which is closely related to yours.

(BTW, these two bug reports are so similar that they should probably
be merged).

Regards,
  Stefano




This bug report was last modified 12 years and 254 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.