GNU bug report logs - #78120
31.0.50; Calendar is not reliable with its marking

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Manuel Giraud <manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>, 78120 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#78120: 31.0.50; Calendar is not reliable with its marking
Date: Sun, 04 May 2025 12:22:41 +0200

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  78120 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 04 May 2025 04:03:41 +0200
>> 
>> Manuel Giraud <manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr> writes:
>> 
>> > >>     1) emacs -Q
>> > >> 
>> > >>     2) Open the file "/tmp/diary", fill it with the following
>> > >>        contents and save:
>> > >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> > >> %%(diary-block 5 4 2025 5 4 2025 'success) Success
>> > >> May 4 2025 Good day
>> > >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>> > >> 
>> > >>     3) M-: (use-package diary-lib :custom (diary-file "/tmp/diary")) 
>> > >> 
>> > >>     4) M-x calendar
>> > >> 
>> > >>     5) Hit 'm' (diary-mark-entries) a few times.  Observe that the
>> > >>        fourth of May has not always the same color.
>> 
>> I tried your recipe but were not able to reproduce what you describe.
>> C-u C-x = always reports exactly one overlay at a marked date, no
>> matter how often I hit m.  I don't know why you see this in emacs -Q.
>
> I can reproduce this.  I think the reason is simple: the above
> scenario places 2 overlays on that date, each one of them specifying a
> different face.  Type "M-x describe-text-properties" on that date, and
> you will see it: one face is 'diary', the other 'success'.  One of
> these overlays comes from diary-mark-sexp-entries, the other from
> calendar-mark-visible-date.  Both overlays have the same (unspecified)
> priority, so which one of them "wins" depends on many factors,
> including the exact memory layout of the Emacs session.  The latter
> changes each time you press 'm', so you sometimes see one or the other
> face.

Ok, thanks for this explanation.

> The solution is to decide which overlay should "win" in this case, and
> give one of them higher or lower priority, as appropriate.

So I think we should have a way, with diary date, to set this priority.
-- 
Manuel Giraud

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.