Subject: bug#78120: 31.0.50; Calendar is not reliable with its marking

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 09:38:08 +0300

> From: Michael Heerdegen <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked],  [email-masked]
> Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 06:05:36 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:
> 
> > Still, I think the faces produced from sexp entities should take
> > precedent (via overlay priorities) over the other faces, as the
> > default.
> 
> Not better than any other random choice, IMO.  An entry being a sexp
> entry only means that the date is complicated to describe, not that the
> entry is more important.

Maybe so, but since we do have to make a (possibly arbitrary) decision
about the priorities, to make the results deterministic, we could as
well use what I suggested (or any other, really).