GNU bug report logs - #78063
[PATCH electronics-team] gnu: Add prjtrellis.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org>

Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:25:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #14 received at 78063 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 78063 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz <at> elenq.tech>
Subject: Re: [bug#78063] [PATCH electronics-team] gnu: Add prjtrellis.
Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 21:04:45 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
>ven. 02 mai 2025 at 16:19, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Maxim,

>> +      #:tests? #f ; tests are to be run from nextpnr-ecp5
>
> nitpick: leave at least two spaces between the code and the ';' margin
> comment, as ensured by Emacs with 'M-;'.  Also, I'm not sure I get what
> it means: the test are run from another package?  Could you explain a
> bit more in a standalone comment above the argument?

The idea is the following, see #77114. We spin-off a common nextpnr
package, from which nextpnr-ice40 inherits, using icestorm as a backend.

We do the same with nextpnr-ecp5, which inherits from nextpnr, and uses
prjtrellis as a backend. Others will follow, see [0].

This makes that example tests in prjtrellis, are to be tested under
nextpnr-ecp5. Prjtrellis, by itself, cannot do much. Hope it is clear.

> Otherwise it looks good to me.  Could you please submit a v2?

Thanks for your review, I just sent v2, hopefully, including all your
improvements.

C.

[0] https://github.com/YosysHQ/nextpnr/blob/master/README.md
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 18 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.