From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:14:52 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#78052 <78052@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#78052 <78052@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [PATCH] gnu: ungoogled-chromium: Fix WebRTC. Reply-To: bug#78052 <78052@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:14:52 +0000 retitle 78052 [PATCH] gnu: ungoogled-chromium: Fix WebRTC. reassign 78052 guix-patches submitter 78052 Danny Milosavljevic severity 78052 normal tag 78052 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 24 19:04:49 2025 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2025 23:04:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42705 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u85cf-0007eo-Fa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 19:04:49 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:34828) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u85cc-0007eX-7b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 19:04:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1u85cW-0006pJ-Qo for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 19:04:40 -0400 Received: from barb.cherry.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.223.10]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1u85cU-0005Rp-Sq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 19:04:40 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|dannym@friendly-machines.com Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650321C2B2B; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 23:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a239.dreamhost.com (100-103-158-130.trex-nlb.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.103.158.130]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1612B1C2859; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 23:04:37 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1745535877; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=r5Z5i6NMLNXrJ56EXv+zCfaUsZ5skbp/2ROsgr7mT5AqfQe9OB8YuFLRkAche2eVcT+L21 +opZ09VMZoaVKIF0WB5l/tnQ2vXpqeSkz03gsZK7S0bnOXJuQuYQGhuHgHB1Jwy0rGDf/z uwhqHkPNtppNVuTB1ih7QV87VsWQE2DsIylp/10FONaPpUjUfcGgZ0LUrULdK7z8JbGaGk F0Yuv64nFZ1EyNTuJz+cccBrVNzOl6DtX3IwiyOWGHSYwuntp9FlDPw0NWL68zoB6IsjwG XNPGtKSz7XgQzQsn05sLwvyI06BAdSeJuibUwb5rUCOjYtdLdUESi1qv8E5rNA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1745535877; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:dkim-signature; bh=fxh2+H43mHv44A5k/ZppQO5vUtxhPxtrHeFxp+0LpSU=; b=Hp3mHekh+mmgIqPsXgtmihum2OPlm6mhnhlDY2xmD1tu854IpK/32xlAPyIOLoYg37W/E6 85lGJ21tS8HddMY4aMPGnpTIiKRbqG7M+qeOk94l2dSIDb31LMvsW0F1p/nF5iqWbbsSca zIvrsiDa0g15fDqx/MpsoQOuab0pl5UtTBReTMHEln2wDqUTXgsuMpDnyHhaPe63VLWoGL U2en4eOBiNLtYRtIRBDyzt0TXg4MYe5EgIJ7BrUlGQY/GiD3TpBVyaFaBilUmMq5LUWuD7 I394QBUjmLKUkyXKjARpttA5INXM5sUw6UleWb5DJk7iw+APYyKFc4s4q2HNSA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-5b8599699-6m4nc; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=dannym@friendly-machines.com X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|dannym@friendly-machines.com X-MC-Relay: Bad X-MC-Copy: stored-urls X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|dannym@friendly-machines.com X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Invention-Share: 3d92ad22506aa80a_1745535877299_162467897 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1745535877298:3288421483 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1745535877298 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a239.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.103.158.130 (trex/7.0.3); Thu, 24 Apr 2025 23:04:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (84-115-226-251.cable.dynamic.surfer.at [84.115.226.251]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dannym@friendly-machines.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a239.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZkBPc4SJqz9y; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:04:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=friendly-machines.com; s=dreamhost; t=1745535876; bh=fxh2+H43mHv44A5k/ZppQO5vUtxhPxtrHeFxp+0LpSU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=WVDfC74m2FtDnuwSIzlogu/sHmADUrY/okPKirgIQhNEbKkkvitK2V3esaQCP6uNX doLoMyUVBscZQUOabf7GpPdwJGw5rJ8RDzVy6ExOF5g3z1CrSKPgZ/yWaWhTxIeK+O bPP+1HL/1IokL38NaGxmgOZJVxPwtAo6Vn/yz0mc9bolc+saqX5T4O7VeczvfkQ8Ng G+JX3Fl+2dmx0xLTqC4ooce0VCriSf4eAkXWQG2zylgRTyaFReyNW4TXbaVXudPvzG 8BcglGngtcbLG22Ui/BpvFuR5PSVbkhIK2+ftHvSuoW3/Wj+5ktSLRNrRyqpNl9Tw9 JLU0zMDT5JOiw== From: Danny Milosavljevic To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ungoogled-chromium: Fix WebRTC. Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 01:04:29 +0200 Message-ID: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.49.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=23.83.223.10; envelope-from=dannym@friendly-machines.com; helo=barb.cherry.relay.mailchannels.net X-Spam_score_int: 12 X-Spam_score: 1.2 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 4.5 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch: New file. * gnu/packages/chromium.scm (%guix-patches): Add reference to it. * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add reference to it. Change-Id: I91b7c3243345f6f1eda71aa4ec68faf3ef4a98f4 --- gnu/local.mk | 1 + gnu/packages/chromium.scm | 3 ++ .../ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 32 inserti [...] Content analysis details: (4.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [84.115.226.251 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom; id=dannym%40friendly-machines.com; ip=2001%3A470%3A142%3A%3A17; r=debbugs.gnu.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Danny Milosavljevic X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 3.5 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch: New file. * gnu/packages/chromium.scm (%guix-patches): Add reference to it. * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add reference to it. Change-Id: I91b7c3243345f6f1eda71aa4ec68faf3ef4a98f4 --- gnu/local.mk | 1 + gnu/packages/chromium.scm | 3 ++ .../ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 32 inserti [...] Content analysis details: (3.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [84.115.226.251 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=dannym%40friendly-machines.com;ip=2001%3A470%3A142%3A%3A17;r=debbugs.gnu.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager * gnu/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch: New file. * gnu/packages/chromium.scm (%guix-patches): Add reference to it. * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add reference to it. Change-Id: I91b7c3243345f6f1eda71aa4ec68faf3ef4a98f4 --- gnu/local.mk | 1 + gnu/packages/chromium.scm | 3 ++ .../ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch diff --git a/gnu/local.mk b/gnu/local.mk index 62cfe230bb..582296e3c9 100644 --- a/gnu/local.mk +++ b/gnu/local.mk @@ -2344,6 +2344,7 @@ dist_patch_DATA = \ %D%/packages/patches/uftrace-fix-tests.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/ultrastar-deluxe-no-freesans.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-extension-search-path.patch \ + %D%/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-ffmpeg-compat.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-RUNPATH.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-system-ffmpeg.patch \ diff --git a/gnu/packages/chromium.scm b/gnu/packages/chromium.scm index 5da5f10da6..45fd719822 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/chromium.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/chromium.scm @@ -385,6 +385,9 @@ (define %guix-patches (list (local-file (assume-valid-file-name (search-patch "ungoogled-chromium-extension-search-path.patch"))) + (local-file + (assume-valid-file-name + (search-patch "ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch"))) (local-file (assume-valid-file-name (search-patch "ungoogled-chromium-RUNPATH.patch"))) diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e9e8664b6f --- /dev/null +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +From 7b0d7f48fbffb412f0c485f86ef33b0dea605d1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Jan Grulich +Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 20:59:06 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] PipeWire capturer: fix fcntl call when duplicating a file descriptor + +The fcntl() call has variable arguments, therefore we need to pass 0 to +specify there are no other arguments for this call, otherwise we might +end up with an argument that is random garbage. + +Bug: webrtc:15174 +Change-Id: I34f16a942d80913b667d8ade7eed557b0233be01 +Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/305120 +Reviewed-by: Alexander Cooper +Commit-Queue: Jan Grulich +Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#40060} +--- + +--- ./third_party/webrtc/modules/desktop_capture/linux/wayland/shared_screencast_stream.cc.orig 2024-11-18 21:48:23.280303055 +0100 ++++ ./third_party/webrtc/modules/desktop_capture/linux/wayland/shared_screencast_stream.cc 2024-11-18 21:48:24.860287444 +0100 +@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ + + if (fd >= 0) { + pw_core_ = pw_context_connect_fd( +- pw_context_, fcntl(fd, F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC), nullptr, 0); ++ pw_context_, fcntl(fd, F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC, 0), nullptr, 0); + } else { + pw_core_ = pw_context_connect(pw_context_, nullptr, 0); + } base-commit: a36ff7d51110403295a359e7f40c3eb42ccfd509 -- 2.49.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 29 02:28:45 2025 Received: (at 78052) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2025 06:28:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46145 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9eSS-0007aK-VV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 02:28:45 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1035.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1035]:58449) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9eSP-0007ZB-8o for 78052@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 02:28:42 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-x1035.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-301cda78d48so7091187a91.0 for <78052@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 23:28:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1745908114; x=1746512914; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=s8J7FkZ6MQkQ7ABe+GFLDxvIL0lZKbC3CtTocqpnRNk=; b=jhgOsMfsjHdZGfCmY+wG6e/ojbDF+W3FeQZgh3cSzHOc10dDvuWz3sKXRUAm6QjTAA 48wbOD9SJbTeBAB9Yx9pBYrpVGBrir64GKkufjNmS4bfsFkxEaq7+B3g3NzX4hWxjl+l wNdwhWRf9JXoYm4TjMRiP/3WIIlk8f/wZxivjl6938ja27RlevJZNxDhWpzIzCWaeSw3 hHrmPeq92l4PLJRXu+ov/tWxtYB3ZuJApEI9BHRsDnF6ysOosaPQQ8+hLpFYtOp5NYgk w/dW9D/XSr962gAOv0oEXM4Fn1BdTYJuobGM+NVIAENJi5x6qohq3ckqr349sJAfJ/NA 7dtw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745908114; x=1746512914; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=s8J7FkZ6MQkQ7ABe+GFLDxvIL0lZKbC3CtTocqpnRNk=; b=LKapui1lQiQlDq0RbWDEM5A91zsVYPBxIDZ3tmrtK6q/N6eYm1Aj+Xli4U1WbtK54A 4f5DJAx+Uj1p0AVyX7CN9ZFw/nBf4lwKHNeRVFxOeJ9Vg21uFHd1r5lhaxGkJwPdZ5u0 1QzOuAQBhsnLCb1wNKnJvepdL4cGedAbOeW+yJ7ZiJCYjOk9gPcbHp09Inndnk/Zlv4X ZN/7lkVlzZU7HWl07JFXUaTTRHRI2OHWp29ElbVPMrT1e6JlmvHiaP782qmXPxQxkK3W 4cLiB7bSFwROrbQDteiyXSDBga3S8v/IXcB3c/3RQgl1ZcZ8aHa3lGnoLnffub3F3kvr jzcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz1JZ/dJ7ZZ0vyFA+4UsEtSehoWRkdY62Bb0IOcGDTisbdAsjZ3 FC8cTNcmEoGZbfKeJZMhkBqEQCm4p+GfMPKKbqWYInTHydjRu52ho0j84A== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctjaDg8p1b7Sk2I+HuS5VzchGP9J9Mj0BQO02ko1I3XceV4YzzJ4zcYmcBqwpo pdO22gabbX+ElU+7iclaySjX4IkyZJp8Z2WXHxceAo23BH1SaK4bkKBv2QGfjYk2hTX6dTqnBRv Xxys4VLwKIRnpUYPOUSe3hyLRphOaff+VEUtjr5QP0j3KHsfIgP5n3KMXTfjVgCf/4RMxTT4GeY GvpE8gU/m7bruCZCZQy44iWQ7FZiY8k47WuxCDCPui6eGEjIeFJ2ZQsXrGEXJz6BEQppdbHw/TT GIPjtwn7V9D+i/bDAA+2hu8oB3QPrI680Nweq5k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEA89H3VOUFXVeNvBwRrCrDcEE9k2Fz24hiBwmie3UpLrLtqvcHZiuJOmZWAwNNzHkUCGaAXA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d644:b0:2fc:3264:3657 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-30a214bcad9mr4749716a91.0.1745908114222; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 23:28:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from terra ([2405:6586:be0:0:83c8:d31d:2cec:f542]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-309ef124682sm10265093a91.31.2025.04.28.23.28.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 28 Apr 2025 23:28:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: [bug#78052] [PATCH] gnu: ungoogled-chromium: Fix WebRTC. In-Reply-To: (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Fri, 25 Apr 2025 01:04:29 +0200") References: Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:28:30 +0900 Message-ID: <87o6wfbhwx.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78052 Cc: 78052@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Danny, Danny Milosavljevic writes: > * gnu/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch: New file. Is this an upstream patch now included in recent releases? Our ungoogled-chromium package is probably ridden with many CVEs at this point (it's poorly maintained). If you use it, perhaps you could try updating it? -- Thanks, Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 29 02:31:24 2025 Received: (at 78052) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2025 06:31:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46198 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9eV1-0001XO-So for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 02:31:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x634.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::634]:55548) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9eUy-0001Mk-JJ for 78052@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 02:31:21 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2240b4de12bso83751475ad.2 for <78052@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 23:31:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1745908274; x=1746513074; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZSF1wzZ14J2arKp2ixnWcQ9VYa45ihbhWKVaCiHnvVg=; b=INEXrdeZpHU4WHXBh+ZUqiKY7sfecMiOdSLbRzmfWX5odS+EfXi7MXPTQuGLfKELIE 8P6hjtpbqYOWnr8cf9/mvk9tJsVGQyU8zsvV0p8vQmpT/rEBuCDwU3ljdqQGamMJQOp3 2c9Zh8PZhAoRH9LkULlU3lzeOC8Bhnw0yRSn0p0uaLV6QaG4d1fTd4luywlUAmSa0lPS Ib12wTNf0MTR4wCMHngygwiJmIr0KawlB5hLl1kfHS7H1mHsctBrthBM6ZMO6OMXOuf5 EPAKS0ItwFAxisS9CVLT/qsL598TCvdi3ZErKkDKewa5wBCSTrma+rS0JfOZ7KLFqe7Z YkLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745908274; x=1746513074; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ZSF1wzZ14J2arKp2ixnWcQ9VYa45ihbhWKVaCiHnvVg=; b=mxXpADvz+gcuHeyLfCn8W9GzgCudICUZXHYqJ751b4xM+fQgZSKibjqXQ2xU52dY44 mEGutsFwSdReZ66BeTALbH0Z095hDM0ks1mf0AZJabtdwzdrSb3bytpfE5qhzkf+g3YZ +OLpm9Lxmr5HOxDgkRHh6JgYIhUwCalYWJSVW6StT1N2PRKPBmhDu5QgTQCLQbP3JFty JqGXDJfG1piD4rQz1XNznPBd8oKhma7nN/PB3Ay65YkcWs3YexJxpgms/LqmYEPj8YMz iIDT0NcOuXZ059WszEAmaCoLwTlsRkPa/n7G37ZBOI7kg6OUr9u+WqsenZD9EneV17Th BPBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw/fbhNmRff+OP0ip/9BcxjQdz/LpntrWJSVhz3l25GfN4LL1Cw KNc2UoHegqxxuzk0MLwrhSNXrGL1w1qaty5qvoLq2B4h/m1BmWx1 X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctcfOdmu++89bAxHGGiaumKid9BYdBUHGq8aZYm0RnGEM/D3TyGm92t94HLGrz 5UsG3naG/5CA+lGWayPjzUdktG0NqBRvr5oEnAql/ny4KZOodKs8gFaqghQSZB2vkB08HeWSSQ3 2n9YSJmP+5OliSnEk2Zbe+RVDEfrmNHV6/oMq7GkgTTPFzE2d7vB0jjYwjj5YP/2XWKPriyXIka 9pIoOZRlL/nNEKQRGyHnokET+6VBpZVVhvus/lDEZtE6zI9CyGCBKXFV7XSmExC9XZRHhERWcnu YdHnORa1wFrXd2woSv3UsOvRRPAhgQ4rP30aSjo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHY5XYsDEV3c7lt9LIFe0j5+pugwFWV7Xtbxx0h42FypuTeDwk8y8W/2FkJITO7Y2ZSrwbg4w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:18b:b0:21f:74ec:1ff0 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-22dc6a68505mr172612845ad.32.1745908274489; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 23:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from terra ([2405:6586:be0:0:83c8:d31d:2cec:f542]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-22db5221661sm94466325ad.250.2025.04.28.23.31.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 28 Apr 2025 23:31:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: [bug#78052] [PATCH] gnu: ungoogled-chromium: Fix WebRTC. In-Reply-To: (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Fri, 25 Apr 2025 01:04:29 +0200") References: Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:31:11 +0900 Message-ID: <87jz73bhsg.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78052 Cc: guix-devel , 78052@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Danny Milosavljevic writes: > * gnu/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch: New file. > * gnu/packages/chromium.scm (%guix-patches): Add reference to it. > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add reference to it. Ouch, the last time ungoogled-chromium was updated was in 2023. That's terrible for something is sensitive as a web browser that runs arbitrary javascript by default. If nobody champions an update, I'd suggest we remove the package. What do people think? (+CC guix-devel). -- Thanks, Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 29 03:57:44 2025 Received: (at 78052) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2025 07:57:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47730 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9fqa-00051o-BW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 03:57:44 -0400 Received: from msg-2.mailo.com ([213.182.54.12]:55532 helo=mailo.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9fqT-000505-4I for 78052@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 03:57:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nicolasgoaziou.fr; s=mailo; t=1745913433; bh=Xsh5ve6Hxu2MGcRdSm37+3EGdSi/8vmL/UGQD/iJIk0=; h=X-EA-Auth:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date: Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=e9DKerW+PR+4oENp7TYLO0auuwostrFj8O+o1hrx4kvy0MLazzOxgltor44LehpyL f8F5DgbPoiVo/o3sZpC+hfYxuIUFu9sCuZBOfJD2QJ1OFAE+Bg08aSrGJ6Bc0Epalj AA8BiXatVaFL/sTVChlviW/ikSm/Z8HZNkScrYi0= Received: by b221-3.in.mailobj.net [192.168.90.23] with ESMTP via ip-20.mailobj.net [213.182.54.20] Tue, 29 Apr 2025 09:57:13 +0200 (CEST) X-EA-Auth: P/GgdhMW+M4sMV0WAE8cv9ou2n5OyJzcmnNEHZBooD2L2i6zKYZaLCLSaZLes43QzkwUaxQigewvOEDnzsd8qOj7axmWuWupscPiKMIhyms= From: Nicolas Goaziou To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: [bug#78052] [PATCH] gnu: ungoogled-chromium: Fix WebRTC. In-Reply-To: <87jz73bhsg.fsf__26579.1745552391$1745908346$gmane$org@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:31:11 +0900") References: <87jz73bhsg.fsf__26579.1745552391$1745908346$gmane$org@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 09:57:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87a57zv1rd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78052 Cc: guix-devel , 78052@debbugs.gnu.org, Danny Milosavljevic X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Danny Milosavljevic writes: > >> * gnu/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch: New file. >> * gnu/packages/chromium.scm (%guix-patches): Add reference to it. >> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add reference to it. > > Ouch, the last time ungoogled-chromium was updated was in 2023. That's > terrible for something is sensitive as a web browser that runs arbitrary > javascript by default. > > If nobody champions an update, I'd suggest we remove the package. > > What do people think? (+CC guix-devel). It still builds, so I disagree that it should be removed. It can still be useful locally, assuming casting is fixed (see ). Of course, it would be nice to update it. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 29 04:15:19 2025 Received: (at 78052) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2025 08:15:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48051 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9g7Z-0007IK-Vr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 04:15:19 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]:57405) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9g7R-0007B5-Rp for 78052@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 04:15:13 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-b1396171fb1so3601617a12.2 for <78052@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 01:15:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1745914503; x=1746519303; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=MQ5kXvL+w/Yj6OR1gigALWZysJDIod6DB5PHly6AuMU=; b=jMQJk65NLVdywRDXg+2VLFvlNzdkjT0eDp0bm9Wmi7wGoBO2jMiPf9sumij+pyBkht dVfTnyTbnucXiE+cDIUGK2k4MwELF2v4+MoJPg2HgtcNkR3i4LmIlxIwJA7ZH07fMPvt ylOMhXNZSuAIJPbYjVBZR3soykLxGCEqswmFUoNFvnqB5GelLxL416DLjLvATbyrtoJ9 1/TxT5VqnmLio8fPLvd541oHHvZGhGefnwA61gWyIQb7ZeReXSPu2H6rBLu91HlQx2LA qvQAt2a2h4omdbvVgCbzNIJXxSRUZptR1KuvAbbBPQuKYMB1EDgRnV1fd8CI1MK4CdTt +cxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745914503; x=1746519303; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MQ5kXvL+w/Yj6OR1gigALWZysJDIod6DB5PHly6AuMU=; b=JGIL5dNA2W6IqDL0SRNfw7/qV+HirlLTbfNe5u0CHiDBwb1cwMnojHEwaTW6q5/ILR rqjYonLJaVVwnUBDUkTq9Hj2drrd5v2T1m1W6Wce88piOLy1RThcURwAf7iN8mAwupxn aWCqBiwTmshIT0jbZT3lsuxzgN+NXs4mMXrC+mrMc3es4fzAFWekv7KMu932wdqBktx5 QkC1lRfMeqxiAb8VvrHNl+B+Swh/5qttI/iTlS7prnD2ArYopL/7KE7/WzgOsHEylEhv 792jQ2cOF/Ut83lzw3rNHbk5T+PK9NG8BfHv9sI9FxFMVBpGdwpdu8U/2M+nMte6fnKF w1Ag== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW0Z9n4At/EfuL15lvTrtIBO9ZbvInoKZL32QzQfmrW+TEqowUdiTh4fEexJZqsMa2n5Z4NKA==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx+4ENu/rGlGx0A6k6qrcM72ccpQFzhcRl/0uucfnZ5I72x6ze4 epMaimwCjs4KHENtcag7YV2CDlkNfq0NXuqK8HlK+Puvly3VSWAt9SmnOg== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuaAnw3CTdUN6/8HT6GKLtRX5scKd4YwStKH+haPNpC/LydQDWSV0fdpdO+7FP wWuBXWeg6+rLkIO6ur1Z/gJrkvU62kgRVgbDm3K5F9RZvKI35chtkZA59Ont3qQ3vQaEiiPYxP6 Qp2DzeSWE+nM2B9975V0nO6/wkjUBYzaQYrnOUMns+yvvsdb3S5Jv4lT1Gb0Xjxbnrurl320Ujp og9bkXPYdyX2DyRl9qF0KV/kTkzgF6DrZu+qf96JmHc/Sf87SYiCgr9MRBH0/fHzAzLXbMnUEtU z50shKK+itrU2C+dWIp+Vt8QAv2XFLrdh17P8JBA+36BIXoF/g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHBDtj2GqPmVBNxeDmMcO8M32vub4tbeGo4m867GFfVAqOdju4YKqQ+qY1RK5llzkGbZQd68w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3d84:b0:2ff:4bac:6fba with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-30a21593ac6mr3875644a91.24.1745914502810; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 01:15:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from terra ([2405:6586:be0:0:83c8:d31d:2cec:f542]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-22db4dbe375sm96220115ad.96.2025.04.29.01.15.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Apr 2025 01:15:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [bug#78052] [PATCH] gnu: ungoogled-chromium: Fix WebRTC. In-Reply-To: <87a57zv1rd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Tue, 29 Apr 2025 09:57:10 +0200") References: <87jz73bhsg.fsf__26579.1745552391$1745908346$gmane$org@gmail.com> <87a57zv1rd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 17:14:58 +0900 Message-ID: <87bjsfbczh.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78052 Cc: guix-devel , 78052@debbugs.gnu.org, Danny Milosavljevic X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > >> Danny Milosavljevic writes: >> >>> * gnu/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch: New file. >>> * gnu/packages/chromium.scm (%guix-patches): Add reference to it. >>> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add reference to it. >> >> Ouch, the last time ungoogled-chromium was updated was in 2023. That's >> terrible for something is sensitive as a web browser that runs arbitrary >> javascript by default. >> >> If nobody champions an update, I'd suggest we remove the package. >> >> What do people think? (+CC guix-devel). > > It still builds, so I disagree that it should be removed. It can still > be useful locally, assuming casting is fixed (see > ). > > Of course, it would be nice to update it. I agree that it has value; wouldn't it only be for testing website problems (it's still a thing in 2025 to find a website feature that only works with Chromium, in a nudge to the good old Internet Explorer days). But I'm not sure that this value is worth the exposure of unsuspecting user to tens of CVEs: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix lint -c cve ungoogled-chromium fetching CVE database for 2025... gnu/packages/chromium.scm:484:2: ungoogled-chromium@112.0.5615.165-1 : prob= ablement vuln=C3=A9rable =C3=A0 CVE-2025-0291, CVE-2025-0434, CVE-2025-0436= , CVE-2025-0437, CVE-2025-0438, CVE-2025-0439, CVE-2025-0441, CVE-2025-0442= , CVE-2025-0443, CVE-2025-0444, CVE-2025-0445, CVE-2025-0446, CVE-2025-0447= , CVE-2025-0448, CVE-2025-0451, CVE-2025-0611, CVE-2025-0612, CVE-2025-0762= , CVE-2025-0995, CVE-2025-0996, CVE-2025-0997, CVE-2025-0999, CVE-2025-1006= , CVE-2025-1426, CVE-2025-1914, CVE-2025-1916, CVE-2025-1918, CVE-2025-1919= , CVE-2025-1920, CVE-2025-1921, CVE-2025-1923, CVE-2025-2135, CVE-2025-2136= , CVE-2025-2137, CVE-2025-2476, CVE-2025-3066, CVE-2025-3067, CVE-2025-3068= , CVE-2025-3069, CVE-2025-3070, CVE-2025-3071, CVE-2025-3072, CVE-2025-3073= , CVE-2025-3074, CVE-2025-3619, CVE-2025-3620, CVE-2024-0222, CVE-2024-0223= , CVE-2024-0224, CVE-2024-0225, CVE-2024-0333, CVE-2024-0517, CVE-2024-0518= , CVE-2024-0519, CVE-2024-0804, CVE-2024-0805, CVE-2024-0806, CVE-2024-0807= , CVE-2024-0808, CVE-2024-0809, CVE-2024-0810, CVE-2024-0811, CVE-2024-0812= , CVE-2024-0813, CVE-2024-0814, CVE-2024-10229, CVE-2024-10230, CVE-2024-10= 231, CVE-2024-10487, CVE-2024-10488, CVE-2024-1059, CVE-2024-1060, CVE-2024= -1077, CVE-2024-10827, CVE-2024-11110, CVE-2024-11111, CVE-2024-11113, CVE-= 2024-11116, CVE-2024-11117, CVE-2024-12053, CVE-2024-12381, CVE-2024-12382,= CVE-2024-12692, CVE-2024-12693, CVE-2024-12694, CVE-2024-12695, CVE-2024-1= 283, CVE-2024-1284, CVE-2024-1669, CVE-2024-1670, CVE-2024-1671, CVE-2024-1= 672, CVE-2024-1673, CVE-2024-1674, CVE-2024-1675, CVE-2024-1676, CVE-2024-1= 938, CVE-2024-1939, CVE-2024-2173, CVE-2024-2174, CVE-2024-2176, CVE-2024-2= 400, CVE-2024-2625, CVE-2024-2626, CVE-2024-2627, CVE-2024-2628, CVE-2024-2= 629, CVE-2024-2630, CVE-2024-2631, CVE-2024-2883, CVE-2024-2884, CVE-2024-2= 885, CVE-2024-2886, CVE-2024-2887, CVE-2024-3156, CVE-2024-3157, CVE-2024-3= 158, CVE-2024-3159, CVE-2024-3168, CVE-2024-3169, CVE-2024-3170, CVE-2024-3= 171, CVE-2024-3172, CVE-2024-3173, CVE-2024-3174, CVE-2024-3175, CVE-2024-3= 176, CVE-2024-3515, CVE-2024-3516, CVE-2024-3832, CVE-2024-3833, CVE-2024-3= 834, CVE-2024-3837, CVE-2024-3838, CVE-2024-3839, CVE-2024-3840, CVE-2024-3= 843, CVE-2024-3844, CVE-2024-3845, CVE-2024-3846, CVE-2024-3847, CVE-2024-3= 914, CVE-2024-4058, CVE-2024-4059, CVE-2024-4060, CVE-2024-4331, CVE-2024-4= 368, CVE-2024-4558, CVE-2024-4559, CVE-2024-4671, CVE-2024-4761, CVE-2024-4= 947, CVE-2024-4948, CVE-2024-4949, CVE-2024-4950, CVE-2024-5157, CVE-2024-5= 158, CVE-2024-5159, CVE-2024-5274, CVE-2024-5496, CVE-2024-5497, CVE-2024-5= 498, CVE-2024-5499, CVE-2024-5500, CVE-2024-5830, CVE-2024-5831, CVE-2024-5= 832, CVE-2024-5833, CVE-2024-5834, CVE-2024-5835, CVE-2024-5836, CVE-2024-5= 837, CVE-2024-5838, CVE-2024-5839, CVE-2024-5840, CVE-2024-5841, CVE-2024-5= 842, CVE-2024-5843, CVE-2024-5844, CVE-2024-5845, CVE-2024-5846, CVE-2024-5= 847, CVE-2024-6100, CVE-2024-6101, CVE-2024-6102, CVE-2024-6103, CVE-2024-6= 290, CVE-2024-6291, CVE-2024-6772, CVE-2024-6774, CVE-2024-6775, CVE-2024-6= 776, CVE-2024-6777, CVE-2024-6778, CVE-2024-6779, CVE-2024-6989, CVE-2024-6= 990, CVE-2024-6991, CVE-2024-6994, CVE-2024-6996, CVE-2024-6997, CVE-2024-6= 998, CVE-2024-6999, CVE-2024-7000, CVE-2024-7001, CVE-2024-7003, CVE-2024-7= 004, CVE-2024-7005, CVE-2024-7018, CVE-2024-7019, CVE-2024-7020, CVE-2024-7= 022, CVE-2024-7024, CVE-2024-7025, CVE-2024-7255, CVE-2024-7532, CVE-2024-7= 534, CVE-2024-7535, CVE-2024-7536, CVE-2024-7550, CVE-2024-7965, CVE-2024-7= 966, CVE-2024-7967, CVE-2024-7968, CVE-2024-7969, CVE-2024-7970, CVE-2024-7= 971, CVE-2024-7972, CVE-2024-7973, CVE-2024-7974, CVE-2024-7975, CVE-2024-7= 976, CVE-2024-7978, CVE-2024-7981, CVE-2024-8193, CVE-2024-8194, CVE-2024-8= 198, CVE-2024-8362, CVE-2024-8636, CVE-2024-8638, CVE-2024-8904, CVE-2024-8= 905, CVE-2024-8906, CVE-2024-8907, CVE-2024-8908, CVE-2024-9121, CVE-2024-9= 122, CVE-2024-9123, CVE-2024-9369, CVE-2024-9602, CVE-2024-9603, CVE-2024-9= 859, CVE-2024-9954, CVE-2024-9955, CVE-2024-9958, CVE-2024-9959, CVE-2024-9= 960, CVE-2024-9962, CVE-2024-9963, CVE-2024-9964, CVE-2024-9966, CVE-2023-2= 459, CVE-2023-2460, CVE-2023-2462, CVE-2023-2464, CVE-2023-2465, CVE-2023-2= 466, CVE-2023-2468, CVE-2023-2721, CVE-2023-2723, CVE-2023-2724, CVE-2023-2= 725, CVE-2023-2726, CVE-2023-2929, CVE-2023-2930, CVE-2023-2931, CVE-2023-2= 932, CVE-2023-2933, CVE-2023-2934, CVE-2023-2935, CVE-2023-2936, CVE-2023-2= 937, CVE-2023-2938, CVE-2023-2940, CVE-2023-2941, CVE-2023-3214, CVE-2023-3= 215, CVE-2023-3216, CVE-2023-3217, CVE-2023-3420, CVE-2023-3421, CVE-2023-3= 422, CVE-2023-3598, CVE-2023-3727, CVE-2023-3728, CVE-2023-3730, CVE-2023-3= 732, CVE-2023-3733, CVE-2023-3734, CVE-2023-3735, CVE-2023-3737, CVE-2023-3= 738, CVE-2023-3740, CVE-2023-4068, CVE-2023-4069, CVE-2023-4070, CVE-2023-4= 071, CVE-2023-4072, CVE-2023-4074, CVE-2023-4075, CVE-2023-4076, CVE-2023-4= 077, CVE-2023-4078, CVE-2023-4349, CVE-2023-4351, CVE-2023-4352, CVE-2023-4= 353, CVE-2023-4354, CVE-2023-4355, CVE-2023-4356, CVE-2023-4357, CVE-2023-4= 358, CVE-2023-4360, CVE-2023-4362, CVE-2023-4364, CVE-2023-4365, CVE-2023-4= 366, CVE-2023-4367, CVE-2023-4368, CVE-2023-4427, CVE-2023-4428, CVE-2023-4= 429, CVE-2023-4430, CVE-2023-4431, CVE-2023-4572, CVE-2023-4761, CVE-2023-4= 762, CVE-2023-4763, CVE-2023-4764, CVE-2023-4860, CVE-2023-4863, CVE-2023-4= 901, CVE-2023-4902, CVE-2023-4904, CVE-2023-4905, CVE-2023-4906, CVE-2023-4= 908, CVE-2023-4909, CVE-2023-5186, CVE-2023-5187, CVE-2023-5217, CVE-2023-5= 218, CVE-2023-5346, CVE-2023-5472, CVE-2023-5473, CVE-2023-5474, CVE-2023-5= 475, CVE-2023-5476, CVE-2023-5477, CVE-2023-5478, CVE-2023-5479, CVE-2023-5= 480, CVE-2023-5481, CVE-2023-5482, CVE-2023-5483, CVE-2023-5484, CVE-2023-5= 485, CVE-2023-5486, CVE-2023-5487, CVE-2023-5849, CVE-2023-5850, CVE-2023-5= 851, CVE-2023-5852, CVE-2023-5853, CVE-2023-5854, CVE-2023-5855, CVE-2023-5= 856, CVE-2023-5857, CVE-2023-5858, CVE-2023-5859, CVE-2023-5996, CVE-2023-5= 997, CVE-2023-6112, CVE-2023-6345, CVE-2023-6346, CVE-2023-6347, CVE-2023-6= 348, CVE-2023-6350, CVE-2023-6351, CVE-2023-6508, CVE-2023-6509, CVE-2023-6= 510, CVE-2023-6511, CVE-2023-6512, CVE-2023-6702, CVE-2023-6703, CVE-2023-6= 704, CVE-2023-6705, CVE-2023-6706, CVE-2023-6707, CVE-2023-7010, CVE-2023-7= 011, CVE-2023-7012, CVE-2023-7013, CVE-2023-7024, CVE-2023-7281, CVE-2023-7= 282 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I'd think that most users expect that security matters for web browsers and that they are kept up to date/secure. --=20 Thanks, Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 29 04:45:55 2025 Received: (at 78052) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2025 08:45:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48572 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9gbD-0002h0-AZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 04:45:55 -0400 Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.1]:62990) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9gb8-0002ft-Hg for 78052@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 04:45:52 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:990:a960:b4f3:8f44:ec4:5af5]) (Authenticated sender: noelopez@free.fr) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8705FB00563; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 10:45:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1745916349; bh=x4TTByxmTwWq6VFjDE95G1A/XuDxOIu4AI8w+KjrbmE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Z9k0NHHxu6T2X2UKXv//sq6QwNsUWA7djuZChuCFGQW9rca8WEGfbOBb0Z6jwZteK B3v4cBVepm3l4AyIz4fnvx04qRVVyh19SZS56p2V8byQWFV/S4we8MvtIpOqUzY9Fi Md/Z53fh6nM+3WzZqRzBbru6Rxhf1TLr/BSrJmnzQxZnDfdF2MZzPmfakA6i12DoSh mJcZqEemJN0M5Ehx1SVrA3VPb9fG2fN/SvqEvLDo0o0+EE9zI2hdBHjQDeJfq5OdMx RXReflsc182WoCnkMY+d/b/8l4KbWZOBhGzJO3WPiIQNGwC5JmEaO/1an+D8Awjfaz DqLWM4gACRslA== From: =?utf-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez To: Maxim Cournoyer , Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: [bug#78052] [PATCH] gnu: ungoogled-chromium: Fix WebRTC. In-Reply-To: <87jz73bhsg.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87jz73bhsg.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 10:45:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87ikmngxtz.fsf@xn--no-cja.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78052 Cc: guix-devel , 78052@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hello, > > Danny Milosavljevic writes: > >> * gnu/packages/patches/ungoogled-chromium-fcntl-fix.patch: New file. >> * gnu/packages/chromium.scm (%guix-patches): Add reference to it. >> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add reference to it. > > Ouch, the last time ungoogled-chromium was updated was in 2023. That's > terrible for something is sensitive as a web browser that runs arbitrary > javascript by default. > > If nobody champions an update, I'd suggest we remove the package. > > What do people think? (+CC guix-devel). > IMO its important that we have one of webkit, chromium and gecko in our repos for when those pesky websites refuse to work with X browser. I=E2=80=99m thinking of microsoft teams that somehow manages to crash on all three. Might be the worst piece of software ever. Have a nice day, No=C3=A9 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQHFBAEBCAAvFiEEXVTPJVeyOOiNwYCiLSIyQQq3QEMFAmgQkbgRHG5vZWxvcGV6 QGZyZWUuZnIACgkQLSIyQQq3QEMI0gv/W7Ly6uNsvz7KQNmxWlBP4/GcIZ1nVBCF gdF0VLq+jaTOUwz9JfkWmUK692j+T8bvQcbZyBLagi1Bp2aOcsCitxQw5cC+qjy9 vFxNXnwXU4jeKzTgYkDkx15ID2FB6WtMKGxVFpGg8svnL25/TB84ZAAhwvc4WSWW ymUAT1aPHB4G7sDH9neJIst9N0Gvbm8MPbX0k/s2fxuTRaOYDk+LTCHqNtRdc4as TFaNTI5W0NP4AKFZzo1QYXHynp08btAOK+M/NopXtFKE8xFTDsA6APVzb4Z64wbe KjvGAskMHoOl1WZbfTO0xy3PdBfjZ9kZP3vOAxt+RNpzh1f787HPSpPQoQpoSWeV dCF+FDSNzrDYd9B7IYxb84EIbDlC3gcacbLWR1WM2vOv2krSKN1X8gymz6hF9ea+ nZLuoZjbASYJCWMhcgJKFNt6onxMp4eTqJP9E2LmNVuo66CDVSZrCK+Ns1jgQ5fx /MvS9y1iHGvi8v8B5bbPinfneZ9/Wqwj =mnfa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 29 09:08:14 2025 Received: (at 78052) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2025 13:08:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53287 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9kh3-0004nP-Sd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 09:08:14 -0400 Received: from msg-4.mailo.com ([213.182.54.15]:37134 helo=mailo.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9kgz-0004lo-Db for 78052@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 09:08:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nicolasgoaziou.fr; s=mailo; t=1745932077; bh=BaR7c/MrkS+mOLmZDBJbSQl8/21Qjj03cDYW8XBAXi4=; h=X-EA-Auth:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date: Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=FWkfX7xq695OjD/zkvwqtc2kbU0bh6Jcg7uFsHFIgf4rksmSs3vdVVKjDEgcbX90b ftl5b/kAkxMTf0sywsLIZxjYULYN5IEOFODyDpBqzCvkF4F5j0kefjWAQDaLnznB0w F/fEaGXi1PZfjNXtypjvUCBfUWyZfPft8JQlRIXA= Received: by b221-7.in.mailobj.net [192.168.90.27] with ESMTP via ip-20.mailobj.net [213.182.54.20] Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:07:57 +0200 (CEST) X-EA-Auth: a5i1sGBzWUhXm1bo7YFYLQAilLECsoulttrifNddvDAaWbpvwP0zBTDHF3g/PKqxjpvFCH2EMvLUsb6hBUtHDFqc1/DN4IGKURnpRforA54= From: Nicolas Goaziou To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: [bug#78052] [PATCH] gnu: ungoogled-chromium: Fix WebRTC. In-Reply-To: <87bjsfbczh.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Tue, 29 Apr 2025 17:14:58 +0900") References: <87jz73bhsg.fsf__26579.1745552391$1745908346$gmane$org@gmail.com> <87a57zv1rd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bjsfbczh.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:07:54 +0200 Message-ID: <874iy7undh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78052 Cc: guix-devel , 78052@debbugs.gnu.org, Danny Milosavljevic X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > > I agree that it has value; wouldn't it only be for testing website > problems (it's still a thing in 2025 to find a website feature that only > works with Chromium, in a nudge to the good old Internet Explorer > days). My hypothetical use-case is simply to display PDF on a Chromecast. It only needs to connect to a LAN. > But I'm not sure that this value is worth the exposure of unsuspecting > user to tens of CVEs: [...] > I'd think that most users expect that security matters for web browsers > and that they are kept up to date/secure. Wouldn=E2=80=99t a big fat warning in the description of the package help? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 29 15:07:58 2025 Received: (at 78052) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2025 19:07:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33621 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9qJA-0005eD-8d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:07:57 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:54560) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9qJ7-0005dX-Do for 78052@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:07:53 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DB21D0; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 21:07:47 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id HraW5TdOcH_P; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 21:07:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67720117; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 21:07:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 21:07:44 +0200 From: Andreas Enge To: =?iso-8859-15?B?Tm/p?= Lopez Subject: Re: [bug#78052] [PATCH] gnu: ungoogled-chromium: Fix WebRTC. Message-ID: References: <87jz73bhsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87ikmngxtz.fsf@xn--no-cja.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87ikmngxtz.fsf@xn--no-cja.eu> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 79DB21D0 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-8.09 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM(-3.00)[-1.000]; BAYES_HAM(-2.99)[99.97%]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[free.fr]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[free.fr,gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com,friendly-machines.com,debbugs.gnu.org,gnu.org] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Bar: -------- X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78052 Cc: guix-devel , Danny Milosavljevic , Maxim Cournoyer , 78052@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Am Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 10:45:44AM +0200 schrieb Noé Lopez: > IMO its important that we have one of webkit, chromium and gecko in our > repos for when those pesky websites refuse to work with X browser. I concur. In particular, many ecommerce websites do not work with icecat, even after disabling all extensions (of which "Searxes' Third-party Request Blocker" is the most meaningful one). So I end up using ungoogled-chromium routinely for "commercial" sites. Of course, someone needs to update it, which is a daunting task... Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 29 15:18:54 2025 Received: (at 78052) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2025 19:18:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33817 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9qTl-00070B-Jl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:18:53 -0400 Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.1]:64396) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9qTg-0006yy-5d for 78052@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:18:50 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:990:a960:b4f3:8f44:ec4:5af5]) (Authenticated sender: noelopez@free.fr) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4B6AB00548; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 21:18:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1745954326; bh=Ty0oq9dnprl8WcX/RiEqR5AV+Swdi+Imxrr4gHk2LUc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=qugdAnfqsl+PBoU7/NWTgwkAeIxB+UwfykvTvFoiCtkFk9qmqfSLwQc6FGn1RjIaK F2KlwKa3uZTvCURd/f8Tdq9lfo0GXpw9L3GraGquTJtHLW7hmyr+vqNFS/fnDcPry+ dZhJ4cdTcqakbjXS2X5FSozxDSVmDnxwyvybe+2tybxQ3dIWOgaAEkS7bBbZ+FryS6 7fu2zKJr292dGqWYWrScdHyPwYmiTd1VFbDCUv0t+BsH2zCDrJcPZHZcTXTMxxt/+z AuVo/AjjuT+M0OZnokzFD+ceMXS9BcH2Xw2ixxpMM0c6S0EAsEdoTVj8aHAfRwJ9/y DA5HVM0iD0wdQ== From: =?utf-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [bug#78052] [PATCH] gnu: ungoogled-chromium: Fix WebRTC. In-Reply-To: References: <87jz73bhsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87ikmngxtz.fsf@xn--no-cja.eu> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 21:18:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87cycuhj3j.fsf@xn--no-cja.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78052 Cc: guix-devel , Danny Milosavljevic , Maxim Cournoyer , 78052@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andreas Enge writes: > Hello, > > Am Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 10:45:44AM +0200 schrieb No=C3=A9 Lopez: >> IMO its important that we have one of webkit, chromium and gecko in our >> repos for when those pesky websites refuse to work with X browser. > > I concur. In particular, many ecommerce websites do not work with icecat, > even after disabling all extensions (of which "Searxes' Third-party > Request Blocker" is the most meaningful one).=20 > > So I end up using ungoogled-chromium routinely for "commercial" sites. > Personally, I would just use the profile with extensions disabled all the time so I switched to librewolf which offers better privacy and has more active development. Unless there are special things that Icecat does compared to librewolf, I think we could reproduce a newer icecat by bundling librewolf with the default icecat extensions. To have the best of both worlds. > Of course, someone needs to update it, which is a daunting task... > For sure=E2=80=A6 Good evening, No=C3=A9 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQHFBAEBCAAvFiEEXVTPJVeyOOiNwYCiLSIyQQq3QEMFAmgRJhARHG5vZWxvcGV6 QGZyZWUuZnIACgkQLSIyQQq3QEMX6gwAjo3SFK0tv4PFsCXoMmCSGbyrsE9vzb0V wLO1cbzinsutQhrK1FNxLVn3EPg2UBQ2c+urN7gUKwLSjizFAFcCELCJM9lVM9Fk 1yRiJsnbTjcMRHNb9LeDuc8PT/Sx5H8JGngv/pzc41vl2kqz6B/XLkCA72nFxTYR xZXKBAPxqK2eHKjyBi0zoVYf5T/Gs8KCy7yqhjeFGcZBHazINH4F5O07iGP65H4Q SWauMtpKOiZkFm7pVgvCm25jQhdnBH98DQmzMlmju2SyJMg99ywsctbLni0wuCi3 uk0NcLWo+wcSZAscGdi74ShFyJqUjEwBK0Wo4jpN1c1rxCIZvn2GYTSPtrAZJg3P epuAQWsFEMnHy7Lxsv7D++sXZnBK0hZlvK4s3Il+/q+V1mvAU2vNWnL0pJEQLxVx nW8Q13GtfwD25n/CcECZHe1QII+YGIldGIVWFRzHmI2u4NcZ4D7N9PGaSO3sbYBw hmqk7o6AXlDN3FMSeM4F/WAnpgiJET8d =HaAg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 29 19:11:33 2025 Received: (at 78052) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2025 23:11:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37270 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9u6v-0003xU-7W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:11:33 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]:51406) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9u6s-0003x0-Rj for 78052@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:11:31 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-22c33677183so69671195ad.2 for <78052@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:11:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1745968284; x=1746573084; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=DRcYqPrq1U58mEjoRZUtt78VFFurO4R+CaX/qxEUs4Q=; b=EnJDSfxTd/M9UgcGbaccfX4S3kdGHAgl7L94qbEUgm8VEWta1F1r5Pf9C32IqISAxS QjGvtHx7NvdNs/IabItSdyvAOuBhtgtblpq36BPJtrmPh7RWazaUgGImI4d0nzbIDHrz 0BajFocq8zVqjCa8D9rt911QHbXNpBkMgkCYDukdskFsdOHXESGq6qhXhno4sve6ECpg w5Uwf7Q9dbLfIQv96j/3WwiP1xlmf3dbnYlQw3vAUVNS1yfrZHr9pJ6ZejcQ9Xx4OvPp FgzRRvHo0jOLTjEHXHE0PqjsFsTQp1bvuEVDhJCmG088W9fLsugZgrArfpboV4cokLt5 c37w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745968284; x=1746573084; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DRcYqPrq1U58mEjoRZUtt78VFFurO4R+CaX/qxEUs4Q=; b=jmItEANvAFzRRACEQFuf+yt0sSjHOukfhgZ1Ttfi5wpMpi7LShLnMDvGsiS1KAzTao WKgZxZAY53NOUG4G9fDynnc1ot7vIfT715VNjB4LEBh3UQlZcx+ibLK/yG42cIxXxwDS +OwxDjZAw9g90pj41LM7ex4ZiRoh/WUxkPYHNjWoV3034p3sOzCF/7U16fLyHN/egTe6 UPxvlstSePd3+eh0wj/Ag5fgixsQUIk13oj405Cxf6M18Z8qxdpHP0A0mgwSGaOCpBwv 1ho8fql0XI6eucvOBpHq3t9CAAmLcLl4u64SkUKaHHoJz7oOdbkcMZL/C3JXAsIsCh7+ erfg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXPrgKqUMlGjvCHmJndCsT0tTqMm+5+Xz3sHj9T/D2kvTbtnaeHBhpMOuxrG5ia4U5Xd8FAow==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxO4+4aMkpi9pJBTuAo9KTNQ6OlxOcPzgFdsPtqnLP7NAY2wW8h s32W7N0fAGN5kPO6hnISX0MvbNzukD4BXMhEruaoOBMkX9RIxC+w X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs1F5ijnq/dtO753m+A42pYmHfNALjG8whf/8RkfJbPpsDdkjZIFH82ZF7btAs we4aIsNc/esnpHoz8kaKPzQV0AGWVw3GG9ibADdirE19WyYiowegcEQsTsDU2V19wiICbMxsbmg A1prtMWZp7VFoGd7GuFtbAKH99/4455wyVr+0L95mCurFR7XeX2anPN1KDIrQLEPLepM6LBjkVt WH6mRgMiHAPyfQAaBbDj2rcTh+WVoIDWBEVtQCn04KhevjcPz9eI2NLIAVWLOkmW+ZKpUuPAKUI kmh9BIKECdtgGirdT+p/58VesrkcKL+HNSlsYhBaYlKZKFcnIw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE5IbkV2Q6e5UBydnZ7bWi7CpENcAeMBjLUnzI3TkOE43b1OD6gtyzVmuoEcJdiAfmYwYVG7w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d4d1:b0:223:67ac:8929 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-22df56bf231mr5551685ad.0.1745968284206; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:11:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from terra ([2405:6586:be0:0:83c8:d31d:2cec:f542]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-22db5100c70sm108798535ad.166.2025.04.29.16.11.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:11:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [bug#78052] [PATCH] gnu: ungoogled-chromium: Fix WebRTC. In-Reply-To: <874iy7undh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:07:54 +0200") References: <87jz73bhsg.fsf__26579.1745552391$1745908346$gmane$org@gmail.com> <87a57zv1rd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bjsfbczh.fsf@gmail.com> <874iy7undh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:11:20 +0900 Message-ID: <87selqa7hj.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78052 Cc: guix-devel , 78052@debbugs.gnu.org, Danny Milosavljevic X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > >> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> >> I agree that it has value; wouldn't it only be for testing website >> problems (it's still a thing in 2025 to find a website feature that only >> works with Chromium, in a nudge to the good old Internet Explorer >> days). > > My hypothetical use-case is simply to display PDF on a Chromecast. It > only needs to connect to a LAN. > >> But I'm not sure that this value is worth the exposure of unsuspecting >> user to tens of CVEs: > > [...] > >> I'd think that most users expect that security matters for web browsers >> and that they are kept up to date/secure. > > Wouldn=E2=80=99t a big fat warning in the description of the package help? I'm not convinced that'd be enough; existing users would probably not see it for example. I think going through the deprecation route would be a more visible option. Our (info "(guix) Deprecation Policy") suggests a one month period after the removal PATCH is submitted, plus a news to etc/news.scm broadcasting the removal in this case, because ungoogled-chromium is probably considered a 'popular' package. This would give someone one month to update it, or move it to another channel (perhaps guix-past could keep legacy browser versions around, for testing for example). --=20 Thanks, Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 29 19:12:33 2025 Received: (at 78052) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2025 23:12:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37283 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9u7s-0003zp-UQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:12:33 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]:60915) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9u7q-0003zY-HK for 78052@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:12:31 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-22438c356c8so72929205ad.1 for <78052@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:12:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1745968344; x=1746573144; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=2Z08nozL/fTrl55bx9S9Wm2uBlHaxOYVBzCtqAws89c=; b=Q06zKhn1EHE82dmypKkd02SDkbPQfYIvGfw0xggY3c+FpPeshOFEQJOIWHtjQWwdKf ssdMdXi1gilnhRV8AaUmuy+uyH484SYs20U1Qs3wmtBtqIVqiltvNN6lAdkyNOiT9dB6 x5RnUdx1xE2sPWOl3pISO+gVz6ugF5ptmDE0vh5hBOTK516kHNxTRzZmPg4MW0jk6tdc kQZyNA+o9b9brfxXgL/YJ5+Lhz+VOSy6gmi0j0E+au4hKDP9QmEA0IlFhYqBYowjjW40 /0mzpIuW/tkRnDIZsCv4RxbUQ9WrknKzbANd+gtvrrUsnFjOtJx3v0K5NKh6eVR+pY0k hrPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745968344; x=1746573144; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2Z08nozL/fTrl55bx9S9Wm2uBlHaxOYVBzCtqAws89c=; b=v2IQj2w/tpG+tv5gT56FJqPvIxLEkkPETbDn7osSADAoRQVlmT5HE55bRx+HidPxwT VgeKWJ/1HNskz6mC8tDq78gMsPE/sKgzxvdY66hOIwKSUawWrPdeO8YEm8IiPc5nKStM b7he8C6pdx8qT480aoxS27VauuyoavJRR1DRAe3t3ovIUmWuItdA1VhMxNwnGBfwkyTX acsxxD/PaDcOc81G3oL2KL5uf7Dug8MMA7HHCG3T7gCrxRa8DjuI6mFI8tMAS1AZZHeJ /1jcuuVlJpBznD5s6USu/MKg9U/giGHmWyU7xr+GDv+S8Qdpp1L1oIWs1/laBpRJ14wo MHOQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXhUzCZV//OgEGkkSiOs0S5k0eTYWtgy4yOfa1uHK4eKoNa8X71GhfqkhChgBkGoGIOrFTHZQ==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxXU8d0Pj3Qszwor1N/D/PePOKeDy552R2EAjUiY/ZMOpNdVJkt 4GWwETS2LRcrsdr31s4t9s+HBKDGEzcoUB2LF4yOAbcFQdqmhFO1 X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs9GzoKYctuOXJgAdehkes3OpcyBkOURSxyMHr0sp2Y/hdCeePaaLufCRZE+Tk LzAfjxHkIAzmDVndBlf3P6JPDv4J1ZM0ZloPKPgP5iFXmrPHssMHsXWZ1J0PJnDNcqZsxyNiRcw xnPfoDSCkC3KBDcdM7VP2nyBjzg+cI4jqlbwwsIzJ18cE2JJlqyXP79DmURuXNlYpbAYWIwraSC WG8dnn6NM6HQlbxOw2s72OjuafDhbfzZ+49PCgIRPdqWLLnF0KhoJ718t6Vq/w0Kh6aK39Jr11t GpwwLxna9cycrOPqI6OCx7Vg7F+srQupq1LEa7E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHQU7vauTQjFzlPYjvtAbeQL0AlmNJtOErUIWz8AA7UK8aVCH4yvGkwjFwWVNBV9S59J5l+OA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f611:b0:224:78e:4eb4 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-22df356e711mr13968105ad.39.1745968344443; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:12:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from terra ([2405:6586:be0:0:83c8:d31d:2cec:f542]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-22db50e7681sm109068865ad.119.2025.04.29.16.12.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:12:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [bug#78052] [PATCH] gnu: ungoogled-chromium: Fix WebRTC. In-Reply-To: (Andreas Enge's message of "Tue, 29 Apr 2025 21:07:44 +0200") References: <87jz73bhsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87ikmngxtz.fsf@xn--no-cja.eu> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:12:20 +0900 Message-ID: <87o6wea7fv.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78052 Cc: guix-devel , =?utf-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez , 78052@debbugs.gnu.org, Danny Milosavljevic X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Andreas, Andreas Enge writes: > Hello, > > Am Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 10:45:44AM +0200 schrieb No=C3=A9 Lopez: >> IMO its important that we have one of webkit, chromium and gecko in our >> repos for when those pesky websites refuse to work with X browser. > > I concur. In particular, many ecommerce websites do not work with icecat, > even after disabling all extensions (of which "Searxes' Third-party > Request Blocker" is the most meaningful one).=20 > > So I end up using ungoogled-chromium routinely for "commercial" sites. > > Of course, someone needs to update it, which is a daunting task... Have you tried librewolf for this use case? It works for me (and unlike ungoogled-chromium, it is maintained thus safer to use). --=20 Thanks, Maxim