GNU bug report logs - #77941
[PATCH] Fix Python block end predicates

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: kobarity <kobarity <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 14:57:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #10 received at 77941-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: kobarity <kobarity <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 77941-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#77941: [PATCH] Fix Python block end predicates
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 14:23:40 +0300
> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 23:56:29 +0900
> From: kobarity <kobarity <at> gmail.com>
> 
> In the process of looking into #77620, I noticed bugs in the
> end-of-block detection functions in python.el.  If there is a comment
> on the last line of the block, `python-info-statement-ends-block-p'
> and `python-info-end-of-block-p' will not work correctly. 
> 
> Try the following Python code.
> 
> def func():
>     return 0  # Comment
> 
> When the point is located after "0" of the return statement, both
> `python-info-statement-ends-block-p' and `python-info-end-of-block-p'
> return nil.  If there is no comment on the line, they return t as
> expected.
> 
> This bug affects `python-nav-forward-sexp'.  In the above example, if
> the point is located at the beginning of "def func()" line,
> (python-nav-forward-sexp) moves the point to after "0".  This is the
> expected behavior.
> 
> However, if we execute (python-nav-forward-sexp -1) there, it moves
> the point to "0". This is not the expected behavior.  If there is no
> comment, it moves the point to the beginning of "def func()" line.
> 
> Attached is a patch that fixes this problem.

Thanks, installed, and closing the bug.




This bug report was last modified 25 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.