GNU bug report logs - #77876
31.0.50; elec-pair --- `electric-pair-inhibit-predicate' ignored for `electric-pair-pairs'

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: fernandodemorais.jf <at> gmail.com, 77876 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#77876: 31.0.50; elec-pair --- `electric-pair-inhibit-predicate' ignored for `electric-pair-pairs'
Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 12:15:42 +0300

Stefan, can you help us understand what is TRT in this case?

> From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 11:32:19 +0100
> Cc: Fernando de Morais <fernandodemorais.jf <at> gmail.com>, 77876 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 
> 	Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> 
> I think unconditional is how that variable is supposed to work.  The syntax-aware stuff is what I did, and it
> uses other mechanisms. So this change appears to be fusing two mechanisms. Ask Stefan Nonnier
> perhaps. he introduced this library into Emacs and guided my work on it. 
> 
> João
> 
> On Sat, May 17, 2025, 09:44 Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> 
>  > From: Fernando de Morais <fernandodemorais.jf <at> gmail.com>
>  > Cc: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>,
>  >   77876 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>  > Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 11:31:45 -0300
>  > 
>  > Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>  > 
>  > > Ping! Any progress with this issue?
>  > 
>  > Sorry for my late reply.  I had trouble finding the tests and then
>  > figuring out how to use them, but attached are the results: both for the
>  > tests applied to the `elec-pair' without modifications, and with them.
>  > 
>  > Eight tests---the same ones---failed in both scenarios.  The others were
>  > successful.  Additionally, I’ve been using `elec-pair' with the
>  > modifications since my original email, and I haven’t encountered any
>  > inconsistencies or errors in my daily use.
> 
>  Thanks.  My results are different: all tests pass both before and
>  after the change.
> 
>  João, based on these results, I think we can install the change?  Or
>  do you remember why the 'unconditional' condition was in the code?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.