GNU bug report logs - #77747
'cursor-face-highlight-mode' signals 'args-out-of-range' in narrowed buffer

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:33:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 77747 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#77747: 'cursor-face-highlight-mode' signals 'args-out-of-range' in narrowed buffer
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:24:02 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 2:37 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:21:40 -0400
> > Cc: 77747 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:58 AM Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >  On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 9:51 AM Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >  On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 5:52 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> >  > From: Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com>
> >  > Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 11:32:18 -0400
> >  >
> >  > -Q reproducer
> >  >
> >  > ;; The culprit appears to be `redisplay--update-cursor-face-highlight'
> >  > (setq debug-on-error t)
> >  > (cursor-face-highlight-mode)
> >  > (save-excursion (insert (propertize "cursor face text\n"
> >  >                                     'cursor-face 'region)))
> >  > (narrow-to-region (pos-bol) (pos-eol))
> >  > (setq unread-command-events (mapcar #'identity
> >  >                                     (kbd "C-n")))
> >
> >  Thanks, does the below fix it?
> >
> >  diff --git a/lisp/simple.el b/lisp/simple.el
> >  index ee09a6f..9e9dd15 100644
> >  --- a/lisp/simple.el
> >  +++ b/lisp/simple.el
> >  @@ -7265,7 +7265,7 @@ redisplay--update-cursor-face-highlight
> >                 (pt (window-point window))
> >                 (cursor-face (get-text-property pt 'cursor-face)))
> >           (let* ((start (previous-single-property-change
> >  -                       (1+ pt) 'cursor-face nil (point-min)))
> >  +                       (min (1+ pt) (point-min)) 'cursor-face nil
> (point-min)))
> >                  (end (next-single-property-change
> >                        pt 'cursor-face nil (point-max)))
> >                  (new (redisplay--highlight-overlay-function
> >
> >  Eli, possible to apply the above soon?
> >
> >  Actually, I'm back to thinking this is better or the effect is that the
> whole buffer can wind up being
> >  unexpectedly highlighted:
> >
> >                         (min (1+ pt) (pos-bol)) 'cursor-face nil
> (point-min)))
> >
> > To be clearer:
> >
> > The original condition (1+ pt) 'cursor-face nil (point-min))) works fine
> in a wide buffer.
> >
> > The condition (min (1+ pt) (point-min)) 'cursor-face nil (point-min)))
> in a wide buffer winds up highlighting all
> > the way to point-min in a buffer where every line has 'cursor-face which
> is undesirable.
>
> It should obviously be point-max, not point-min.
>

Yeah.  Of course.  Feel free to apply AFAIC.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 118 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.