GNU bug report logs - #77715
[PATCH] Add ring-bell functions for mode line and header line.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #83 received at 77715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com>
Cc: eg642616 <at> gmail.com, 77715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams <at> oracle.com
Subject: Re: bug#77715: [PATCH] Add ring-bell functions for mode line and
 header line.
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 17:06:22 +0300

> From: Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 09:52:44 -0400
> Cc: eg642616 <at> gmail.com, 77715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams <at> oracle.com
> 
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 9:41 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> 
>  > From: Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com>
>  > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 09:10:05 -0400
>  > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 77715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams <at> oracle.com
>  > 
>  > Face flashing isn't a feature of bell ringing, it's the opposite.
> 
>  ??? Then why is ring-bell-functions being mentioned?
> 
>  > I'd consider putting the face flashing code with
>  > face-related code so it's clear faces can be flashed anywhere for any reason the users want.
> 
>  But this code is not general enough for that.  It was written
>  explicitly for additional optional values for ring-bell-functions, as
>  the doc strings say.
> 
> The prototype was derived from private code used in this narrow case but if we're going to adopt the
> functionality in core, I think we go the extra mile to make it appropriately general.

But then the entire implementation should be revisited and reviewed
with that generality in mind.  So please let's talk about that.  Could
you or someone else please describe what general features are meant to
be implemented based on this functionality?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.