GNU bug report logs -
#77650
30.1; strange docstring for dired-do-touch
Previous Next
Reported by: Francesco Potortì <pot <at> potorti.it>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 17:30:03 UTC
Severity: minor
Found in version 30.1
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 09 Apr 2025 14:27:58 +0300
with message-id <86tt6xshfl.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#77650: 30.1; strange docstring for dired-do-touch
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #77650,
regarding 30.1; strange docstring for dired-do-touch
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
77650: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=77650
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
This is the start of defun of dired-do-touch in dired-aux.el
(defun dired-do-touch (&optional arg)
"Change the timestamp of the marked (or next ARG) files.
This calls touch.
Type Type \\<minibuffer-local-completion-map>\\[next-history-element] \
to pull the file attributes of the file at point
into the minibuffer."
The last three lines of the docstring make no sense to me because:
1. "Type" is repeated twice
2. when I call for description of "T" in a dired buffer, those lines show as:
Type Type M-n to pull the file attributes of the file at point
into the minibuffer.
But M-n calls clone-buffer
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
> From: Francesco Potortì <pot <at> potorti.it>
> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 19:28:18 +0200
>
> This is the start of defun of dired-do-touch in dired-aux.el
>
> (defun dired-do-touch (&optional arg)
> "Change the timestamp of the marked (or next ARG) files.
> This calls touch.
> Type Type \\<minibuffer-local-completion-map>\\[next-history-element] \
> to pull the file attributes of the file at point
> into the minibuffer."
>
> The last three lines of the docstring make no sense to me because:
>
> 1. "Type" is repeated twice
That's a typo.
> 2. when I call for description of "T" in a dired buffer, those lines show as:
>
> Type Type M-n to pull the file attributes of the file at point
> into the minibuffer.
>
> But M-n calls clone-buffer
The intent was to tell that you can type M-n after invoking the
command. IOW, type "T M-n".
I've now fixed this (and several similar issues in a few other doc
strings) on the emacs-30 branch, and I'm therefore closing this bug.
This bug report was last modified 38 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.