GNU bug report logs - #77628
[PATCH] ; Fix `elisp-eldoc-funcall-with-docstring' when fn has no docstring.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 77628 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 77628 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Elijah Gabe Pérez <eg642616 <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] ; Fix `elisp-eldoc-funcall-with-docstring' when fn has no
 docstring.
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 23:06:45 -0600

Tags: patch

This patch makes `elisp-eldoc-funcall-with-docstring' handle functions
without a docstring and limit docstring to 1000 characters.

-- 
                                          - E.G via GNU Emacs and Org.

Message #8 received at 77628 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Elijah Gabe Pérez <eg642616 <at> gmail.com>
To: 77628 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] ; Fix `elisp-eldoc-funcall-with-docstring' when fn has no
 docstring.
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 23:08:18 -0600

[0001-Fix-elisp-eldoc-funcall-with-docstring-when-fn-has-n.patch (text/patch, attachment)]

[Message part 2 (text/plain, inline)]

-- 
                                          - E.G via GNU Emacs and Org.

Message #11 received at 77628 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Elijah Gabe Pérez <eg642616 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 77628 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#77628: [PATCH] ;
 Fix `elisp-eldoc-funcall-with-docstring' when fn has no docstring.
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 14:17:42 +0300

> From: Elijah Gabe Pérez <eg642616 <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 23:08:18 -0600
> 
> * lisp/progmodes/elisp-mode.el (elisp-eldoc-funcall-with-docstring):
> Add "Undocumented" as docstring if the function as no docstring,
> and limit docstring length to 1000 characters.  (bug#)

Thanks, but should 1000 be hard-coded, or should we perhaps have a
variable for it?

Message #14 received at 77628 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Elijah Gabe Pérez <eg642616 <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 77628 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#77628: [PATCH] ; Fix `elisp-eldoc-funcall-with-docstring'
 when fn has no docstring.
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 12:23:06 -0600

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Elijah Gabe Pérez <eg642616 <at> gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 23:08:18 -0600
>> 
>> * lisp/progmodes/elisp-mode.el (elisp-eldoc-funcall-with-docstring):
>> Add "Undocumented" as docstring if the function as no docstring,
>> and limit docstring length to 1000 characters.  (bug#)
>
> Thanks, but should 1000 be hard-coded, or should we perhaps have a
> variable for it?

I've added a variable for limit both
`elisp-eldoc-funcall-with-docstring' and
`elisp-eldoc-var-docstring-with-value'.

`elisp-eldoc-var-docstring-with-value' also set a limit.

[0001-Add-variable-for-control-docstring-length-in-elisp-e.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

-- 
                                          - E.G via GNU Emacs and Org.

Message #19 received at 77628-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Elijah Gabe Pérez <eg642616 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 77628-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#77628: [PATCH] ; Fix `elisp-eldoc-funcall-with-docstring'
 when fn has no docstring.
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 13:05:02 +0300

> From: Elijah Gabe Pérez <eg642616 <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: 77628 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 12:23:06 -0600
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Elijah Gabe Pérez <eg642616 <at> gmail.com>
> >> Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 23:08:18 -0600
> >> 
> >> * lisp/progmodes/elisp-mode.el (elisp-eldoc-funcall-with-docstring):
> >> Add "Undocumented" as docstring if the function as no docstring,
> >> and limit docstring length to 1000 characters.  (bug#)
> >
> > Thanks, but should 1000 be hard-coded, or should we perhaps have a
> > variable for it?
> 
> I've added a variable for limit both
> `elisp-eldoc-funcall-with-docstring' and
> `elisp-eldoc-var-docstring-with-value'.
> 
> `elisp-eldoc-var-docstring-with-value' also set a limit.

Thanks, installed with a few minor corrections.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.