GNU bug report logs - #7761
The NS port is still 11 times slower than normal

Previous Next

Packages: ns, emacs;

Reported by: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:59:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: wontfix

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#7761: closed (Re: bug#7761: The NS port is still 11 times
 slower than normal)
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 19:06:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#7761: The NS port is still 11 times slower than normal

which was filed against the emacs,ns package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 7761 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
7761: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7761
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: 7761-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#7761: The NS port is still 11 times slower than normal
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:05:49 -0400
I don't see a need to keep open this particular report, which was marked
"wontfix" some time ago.

This is a very general report. It is better to focus on specific issues
in separate reports and try and fix them (for example, #2056).


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: The NS port is still 11 times slower than normal
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:05:22 +0000
Hi all,

There are numerous bug reports on the issues of NS port, in particular
the performance degradation after turning flyspell on.

I did a build of the NS port from trunk two days ago. And I tried
flyspell-buffer on the about page (C-h C-a). And it was about 11 times
slower than a same run on other terminals (X11, tty, Mac) etc.

Some of the reports are as old as two years ago. There seems little hope
it will shape up in the foreseeable future. I have been told even as it
stands today it is already much improved.

Meanwhile, we have a better alternative (the macport¹) that provides
comparable feature set as in GNU/Linux and without any compromise in
performance.

I wonder if macport should be merged?

Thanks.

Leo

Footnotes: 
¹  ftp://ftp.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp/emacs




This bug report was last modified 13 years and 348 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.