GNU bug report logs - #77590
[PATCH 0/3] Update hdf5 to 1.14.6, fix wrappers and remove generated source files.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: David Elsing <david.elsing <at> posteo.net>

Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 23:25:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>

Full log


Message #32 received at 77590 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: David Elsing <david.elsing <at> posteo.net>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: rekado <at> elephly.net, bavier <at> posteo.net, sharlatanus <at> gmail.com,
 77590 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] gnu: hdf5: Update to 1.14.6.
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:22:19 +0000
Hello,

Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> writes:

> I only had a very cursory look at your patches; they are not picked up
> by QA, did you use "git send-email" for submitting them?

Yes, I sent them as usual.

> I do not think the hdf5-examples package makes sense if the examples are
> not installed as some kind of documentation. What is its goal? We could
> either drop it altogether. Or include its phases somehow into the main
> hdf5 package so that its tests constitute an additional check phase.
> Or also install the examples.

I'm also not sure how useful installing the examples would be, as they
are included in the source already, so I think we should just remove the
package.

> I suppose you wrote the reproducibility patch for hdf(5)-java yourself;
> would it make sense to upstream it?

No, I adapted the previous patch in Guix, which modifies the "configure"
script, to change "configure.ac" instead.

For hdf5-java, I added the 'strip-jar-timestamps phase.

Anyway, I just noticed that upstream removed the Autotools build scripts
(in favor of CMake) last month. :)
I'll change the packages to already use CMake instead.

Best,

David




This bug report was last modified 27 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.