GNU bug report logs - #77466
[PATCH] gnu: nano: Update to 8.4.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 77466 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 77466 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Tai <atai <at> atai.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Andy Tai <atai <at> atai.org>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: nano: Update to 8.4.
Date: Wed,  2 Apr 2025 09:48:50 -0700

* gnu/packages/text-editors.scm (nano): Update to 8.4.

Change-Id: I165f81c467030ac49b6b610d1679113fc10f7bb7
---
 gnu/packages/text-editors.scm | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/text-editors.scm b/gnu/packages/text-editors.scm
index 33462748fce..1719b36be4c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/text-editors.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/text-editors.scm
@@ -969,13 +969,13 @@ (define-public mg
 (define-public nano
   (package
     (name "nano")
-    (version "8.3")
+    (version "8.4")
     (source
      (origin
       (method url-fetch)
-      (uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/nano/nano-" version ".tar.xz"))
+      (uri (string-append "https://nano-editor.org/dist/v8/nano-" version ".tar.xz"))
       (sha256
-       (base32 "07hiixvs6g2ahm6n140kz96difsv3dm6h8wkfh7ykxr85rxp26sm"))))
+       (base32 "13b2iqmbx5vcyd0rnvvc9l8l79q6665r4xx6gvc28mnmpci95ljs"))))
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (inputs
      (list gettext-minimal ncurses))

base-commit: 111aacf22fdc0314f41b737106ad70c1899a58e7
-- 
2.43.0

Message #10 received at 77466-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: Andy Tai <atai <at> atai.org>
Cc: 77466-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: nano: Update to 8.4.
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 13:35:40 +0200

Hello Andy,

your patch has passed QA. However, there is no reason to change the source
location, even more so since it is a GNU package. So I have done a
   ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u nano
on my end and pushed the resulting patch (this also verifies the gnupg
signature, and shows the same hash as you give).

Andreas

Message #13 received at 77466-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Tai <atai <at> atai.org>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 77466-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: nano: Update to 8.4.
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 09:10:26 -0700

OK, the nano maintainer did not put the source tar gz file at the
usual location at first. I did send him email. Maybe he add it later.

On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 4:35 AM Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> wrote:
>
> Hello Andy,
>
> your patch has passed QA. However, there is no reason to change the source
> location, even more so since it is a GNU package. So I have done a
>    ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u nano
> on my end and pushed the resulting patch (this also verifies the gnupg
> signature, and shows the same hash as you give).
>
> Andreas
>


--

Message #16 received at 77466-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Z572 <z572 <at> z572.online>
To: Andy Tai <atai <at> atai.org>
Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>, 77466-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#77466] [PATCH] gnu: nano: Update to 8.4.
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 20:03:33 +0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Andy Tai <atai <at> atai.org> writes:

> OK, the nano maintainer did not put the source tar gz file at the
> usual location at first. I did send him email. Maybe he add it later.
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 4:35 AM Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Andy,
>>
>> your patch has passed QA. However, there is no reason to change the source
>> location, even more so since it is a GNU package. So I have done a
>>    ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u nano
>> on my end and pushed the resulting patch (this also verifies the gnupg
>> signature, and shows the same hash as you give).
>>
>> Andreas
>>

Hi, after updating this version, the cross compilation fails. Can you
take a look?

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #19 received at 77466-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Tai <atai <at> atai.org>
To: Z572 <z572 <at> z572.online>
Cc: 77643 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>,
 77466-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#77466] [PATCH] gnu: nano: Update to 8.4.
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 06:43:21 -0700

patch for fixing this as https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=77643

On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 5:03 AM Z572 <z572 <at> z572.online> wrote:
>
> Andy Tai <atai <at> atai.org> writes:
>
> > OK, the nano maintainer did not put the source tar gz file at the
> > usual location at first. I did send him email. Maybe he add it later.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 4:35 AM Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Andy,
> >>
> >> your patch has passed QA. However, there is no reason to change the source
> >> location, even more so since it is a GNU package. So I have done a
> >>    ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u nano
> >> on my end and pushed the resulting patch (this also verifies the gnupg
> >> signature, and shows the same hash as you give).
> >>
> >> Andreas
> >>
>
> Hi, after updating this version, the cross compilation fails. Can you
> take a look?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.