From unknown Sat Sep 20 14:55:25 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#77346 <77346@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#77346 <77346@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: itk-snap does not build Reply-To: bug#77346 <77346@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 21:55:25 +0000 retitle 77346 itk-snap does not build reassign 77346 guix submitter 77346 Andreas Enge severity 77346 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 28 16:04:09 2025 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2025 20:04:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55595 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tyFw1-0004eo-3W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:04:09 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:38600) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tyFvy-0004eD-A2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:04:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tyFvp-0002XM-Lb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:03:57 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tyFvn-0007Xw-6Y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:03:57 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7730D391; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:03:50 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id pNAkKy04SNl8; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:03:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E11AC4; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:03:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:03:47 +0100 From: Andreas Enge To: bug-guix@gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus Subject: itk-snap does not build Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7730D391 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.40 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[1.000]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Rspamd-Action: greylist X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ X-Rspamd-Server: hera Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.233.100.1; envelope-from=andreas@enge.fr; helo=hera.aquilenet.fr X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello Ricardo, in my examination of dependencies of hdf5 I have come across itk-snap, which also does not build in master currently; you added the package in 2019. Since then, there have been new releases (4.0 in 2023, 4.2.2 in December 2024). Would you be interested in working on an update? Given the complexity of the package, this looks like quite some work; so if there is no particular interest in the package any more, removing it could also be an option. Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 28 16:23:15 2025 Received: (at 77346) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2025 20:23:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55637 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tyGEV-0005dZ-Bx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:23:15 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:51538) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tyGEQ-0005dE-Tq for 77346@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:23:13 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB1F3B3; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:23:04 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id qEIIlOFnwsGX; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:23:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27A041A0; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:23:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:23:01 +0100 From: Andreas Enge To: 77346@debbugs.gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: itk-snap does not build Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0BB1F3B3 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.41 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[1.000]; BAYES_HAM(-2.99)[99.96%]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Rspamd-Action: greylist X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 77346 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) PS: The package vtk@7 has itk-snap as its only dependency, and could probably be dropped in favour of vtk@9 after an itk-snap update or removal; maybe other packages could be tidied up as well. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 01 06:20:39 2025 Received: (at 77346) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2025 10:20:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46546 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tzYjV-0004Br-TS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 06:20:38 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:53454) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tzYjR-00049d-Tm for 77346@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 06:20:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE77E2CE; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 12:20:27 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id T_ZD4-jcfaJR; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 12:20:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71550284; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 12:20:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 12:20:24 +0200 From: Andreas Enge To: 77346@debbugs.gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: itk-snap does not build Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DE77E2CE X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.60 / 15.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 77346 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Am Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 09:23:01PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge: > PS: The package vtk@7 has itk-snap as its only dependency, and could > probably be dropped in favour of vtk@9 after an itk-snap update or > removal; maybe other packages could be tidied up as well. to satisfy the procedure of our deprecation policy, I am making a more formal suggestion, to remove itk-snap and vtk@7 on or after May 1st unless someone expresses an interest in itk-snap. Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 01 06:27:42 2025 Received: (at 77346) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2025 10:27:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46571 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tzYqL-0005aT-LD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 06:27:42 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21193) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tzYqG-0005Z6-4F for 77346@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 06:27:38 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1743503252; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=GsCq/TLjHkvmqy4Nxes1otTbIpAutg2KLmtzWWHvbeYD49YC3NMV8Qo3rN9xEJY6ewMsocETpycp3jW/a6sPttQdPfAR588Ez95LINHqDHfoemX3iNCx6Uib931e1bL3RhF+GVGTtHsVz0SHHpPbDxDtmfugI6DvIteRlBUOGK8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1743503252; h=Content-Type:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=Nc8bpYu1Aq9A9NNgskvXLcrpQtV4TCA2Bw+v7PVBa54=; b=LaadVT5R14Z+j9sPFyPcVumxOEj4QzfuYG8k0bkVRDHrwnEOB8yKgWBM7/+MUDVenq6ntV3O5gVC2A2EQPxlh0pcx1UCnhKHFEdoTfDrmG8x810w6Vc+Mvqu4rZsz9wx1pcCdE0WcrBoj6SVEFY8sNb/FZjYNVjqv+VS4z+8oaI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1743503251; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=From:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=Nc8bpYu1Aq9A9NNgskvXLcrpQtV4TCA2Bw+v7PVBa54=; b=Hn/GO8WkqauUC4slEw+yuE5YuU9PdE4ly79U3viT2Q8qWB7TJ3bRkcAfOTTXHk4c n5UnGjjY+gGAAcKo7ervNXowNTJM/ii6whqK6XA3c0JOwQrunC+ourSOZQIGYasI0gN Ih/lnG2mxDnQv89ahgd2blv2qqB7is75vFy+7OcE= Received: by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1743503248689124.09349481742038; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 03:27:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: itk-snap does not build In-Reply-To: (Andreas Enge's message of "Tue, 1 Apr 2025 12:20:24 +0200") References: User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4 Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 12:27:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87bjtgfa7m.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 77346 Cc: 77346@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Andreas Enge writes: > Hello, > > Am Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 09:23:01PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge: >> PS: The package vtk@7 has itk-snap as its only dependency, and >> could >> probably be dropped in favour of vtk@9 after an itk-snap >> update or >> removal; maybe other packages could be tidied up as well. > > to satisfy the procedure of our deprecation policy, I am making > a more > formal suggestion, to remove itk-snap and vtk@7 on or after May > 1st > unless someone expresses an interest in itk-snap. I'd like to keep it. I'm fixing itk-snap right now. Do you still want to remove vtk@7? -- Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 01 07:06:26 2025 Received: (at 77346) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2025 11:06:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46678 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tzZRq-0001kM-CY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 07:06:26 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:43734) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tzZRn-0001im-Cc for 77346@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 07:06:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F441293; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 13:06:16 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id OthZdWIjts7U; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 13:06:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC5901F4; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 13:06:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 13:06:11 +0200 From: Andreas Enge To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: itk-snap does not build Message-ID: References: <87bjtgfa7m.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bjtgfa7m.fsf@elephly.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3F441293 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.60 / 15.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 77346 Cc: 77346@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 12:27:25PM +0200 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: > I'd like to keep it. I'm fixing itk-snap right now. Okay, great! > Do you still want to remove vtk@7? Well, it depends on whether we need it or not :) We can keep it if itk-snap requires it, or if it would be too much work moving itk-snap to vtk@9. Otherwise I would see no point in keeping it. Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 02 03:51:52 2025 Received: (at 77346) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2025 07:51:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54347 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tzst5-0008NC-QV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 03:51:52 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21117) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tzst2-0008Ml-3x for 77346@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 03:51:49 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1743580304; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=L3OcIO3u0C0qd6vVTZWddeszKwii0W0ieoEZzO72KyqzwqNnWEsIDdp2pwR7u6s0XnLi7L5tKoEWgaUsj17mhBUaNqCKyiGWmkcfxfRR7WKn+4Kt3JztF9Sq5mKOvS5fFHujVVVcH5694eq07S7GP+S4OFdtGcQ7+mIwUJfczbQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1743580304; h=Content-Type:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=LjwBy11cpZLR4L1Z/PggDuzw7JwJAEZUi/pp/VY2JfY=; b=SXLGTrDVoS7FQgXCOvbDtsEENZyOc/0msYaC3IFztYZpPB/SGci2fewDbI1011zI7H1dFVKH8MxEqcsHLFtQ6KjRs+PSqpOspGZsz+L3dE9B27S6LFyaO8onQTXGGxw2ImaF+hXbNknBh1gYEugixEuYuR1jvirVHR5nv3ncHFc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1743580304; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=From:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=LjwBy11cpZLR4L1Z/PggDuzw7JwJAEZUi/pp/VY2JfY=; b=aMD4R/DjVmmIVqqzFoGTE5Q22vp4IPiyatqqXKojcEU4GCuM0Z5Gj2iJvQ4XM1io oStU1ZjSsLg69WYQixpViUu1W2d5J84nQIriy4WvN3waA3m6GT5FdxIzNrDbsAkwBOR UkC5FQvmgeDgr/RQaUquDVL5EJRPnotRgc1cl60g= Received: by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1743580301689601.7617799141527; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 00:51:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: itk-snap does not build In-Reply-To: (Andreas Enge's message of "Tue, 1 Apr 2025 13:06:11 +0200") References: <87bjtgfa7m.fsf@elephly.net> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4 Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 09:51:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87cydvdmra.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 77346 Cc: 77346@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Andreas Enge writes: > Am Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 12:27:25PM +0200 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: >> I'd like to keep it. I'm fixing itk-snap right now. > > Okay, great! > >> Do you still want to remove vtk@7? > > Well, it depends on whether we need it or not :) > We can keep it if itk-snap requires it, or if it would be too > much work > moving itk-snap to vtk@9. Otherwise I would see no point in > keeping it. I have fixed itk-snap on the master branch. I'm currently attempting to build ITK 5.4.2 on my laptop (and I keep running out of space on disk and in main memory...), which would be needed for the latest version of itk-snap, which can be built with vtk@9. I cannot say when I'll finish this, because I'm spread a little too thin between fixing all the packages you want to remove and making progress on the python-team and r-team branches, but I'd be happy if we could keep these packages for a while longer. -- Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 02 04:13:21 2025 Received: (at 77346) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2025 08:13:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54443 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tztDt-0002nu-Fu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 04:13:21 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:41720) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tztDq-0002ms-HB for 77346@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 04:13:19 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491C725A; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:13:10 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id zLiutaHOroaM; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:13:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C50D204; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:13:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:13:05 +0200 From: Andreas Enge To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: itk-snap does not build Message-ID: References: <87bjtgfa7m.fsf@elephly.net> <87cydvdmra.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87cydvdmra.fsf@elephly.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 491C725A X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-9.48 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM(-2.88)[-0.960]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Bar: --------- X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 77346 Cc: 77346@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 09:51:37AM +0200 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: > I have fixed itk-snap on the master branch. Nice! So in principle we could close this bug, unless you want to keep it open as a reminder for the itk-snap update. > I'm currently attempting to build ITK 5.4.2 on my laptop (and I keep running > out of space on disk and in main memory...), which would be needed for the > latest version of itk-snap, which can be built with vtk@9. I cannot say > when I'll finish this, because I'm spread a little too thin between fixing > all the packages you want to remove and making progress on the python-team > and r-team branches, but I'd be happy if we could keep these packages for a > while longer. Sure! There is the one month delay anyway; if you need more time, it would be nice if you could reply to the corresponding bugs before the delay runs out to make clear you are working on them, and then I would not push the removals without asking again. Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 29 07:03:12 2025 Received: (at 77346-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2025 11:03:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51013 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9ik3-00037j-7M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 07:03:12 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:50660) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u9ijy-00036z-W5 for 77346-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 07:03:07 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29795311; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:03:01 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dg94LEoPVQKJ; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:03:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A8AA53; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:03:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:02:58 +0200 From: Andreas Enge To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: itk-snap does not build Message-ID: References: <87bjtgfa7m.fsf@elephly.net> <87cydvdmra.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 29795311 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.41 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[1.000]; BAYES_HAM(-2.99)[99.95%]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ X-Rspamd-Action: greylist X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 77346-done Cc: 77346-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, closing this bug as the main issue is solved. Work on tidying up the distribution is always welcome, but as long as packages build, we can also keep outdated ones. Andreas From unknown Sat Sep 20 14:55:25 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 11:24:14 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator