Subject: bug#7729: 24.0.50; doc string of `image-mode-fit-frame'

From: "Drew Adams" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:29:26 -0700

> > Actually, the command name should reflect this behavior:
> > `toggle-fit-frame-to-image' or some such.
> 
> No, I don't think that's warranted.

Why not?

The command only does what the current name says 50% of the time.  It does what
the new, suggested name says 100% of the time.

Not to mention that `-mode-' here is unnecessary verbiage.  The command toggles
frame fitting to an image.

Why not improve things by giving it a name that fits?