GNU bug report logs - #77203
[PATCH 0/4] gnu: Add fscrypt.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: 45mg <45mg.writes <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 10:23:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #55 received at 77203-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: 45mg <45mg.writes <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 77203-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Wilko Meyer <w <at> wmeyer.eu>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>,
 Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Linux native filesystem encryption (fscrypt).
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 20:28:58 -0400
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 06:44:40AM +0000, 45mg wrote:
> From that page and from the test I described above, it looks like
> CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION is the only option that's strictly necessary for
> the default encryption mode.
> 
> The other options mentioned in the docs seem to be either (1) for using
> other encryption modes, or (2) for hardware acceleration, which is
> platform-specific. I don't have any need for (1) so I probably won't
> look into it in the near future. Once this patch series is merged and I
> start relying on fscrypt, I should get an idea of the performance
> situation; at that point I might look into (2) if I feel that the
> un-accelerated performance isn't good enough.
> 
> (In the meantime, of course, anyone else is welcome to look into it.)

Sounds good! I pushed the patches as
bf6736bd878a14e0520a550bf8fbf8edb69876df

Thanks for working on this!




This bug report was last modified 42 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.