GNU bug report logs - #77186
[PATCH 00/13] Revamp the gitolite-service-type

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>

Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 16:49:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 77186 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#77186] [PATCH v2 02/13] services: gitolite-rc-file: Add log-extra field.
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 14:40:31 +0900
Hi Tomas,

Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> writes:

> * gnu/services/version-control.scm (<gitolite-rc-file>): Add log-extra field.
> (gitolite-rc-file-compiler): Handle it during configuration file generation.
> * doc/guix.texi (Version Control Services): Document it.

[...]

> +@item @code{log-extra} (default: @code{#f})
> +Whether gitolite should log extra details.
> +
> +For historical reasons, this field defaults to @code{#f}.  The default
> +value from gitolite however is @code{1} (written as @code{#t} in this
> +configuration).

Since this is newly introduced, what ar ethe historical reasons given?
Shouldn't it follows the default upstream behavior and default to #t?

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim




This bug report was last modified 50 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.