From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 22 11:48:55 2025 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2025 15:48:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44775 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tw15j-0008Kl-8q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:48:55 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:44618) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tw15g-0008KP-VB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:48:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tw15Y-0005Mc-S4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:48:44 -0400 Received: from mail.z572.online ([88.99.160.180]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tw15X-0003tl-6k for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:48:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=z572.online; s=me; t=1742658880; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dmFvwb7txRspDBl/USyfH5oHdjx23Ts5IjloiPwdEMo=; b=uNtV5EuGEwxCtmSFS1kKv+OVl3uGX8dFvzzfPlt7DrbA1DplI7Qu8fiOUMe6aC5Fxzo8ix 8b3HEiHhjAQ55DlIr89iS9B8VcoP9w62amVEsdZ6twslahP4MQ102ZdmFlBemkl+DvQrpF c/Za44qsGKJx2fwo7df208E2IU7qDuc= Received: from m.tailaa68d.ts.net (mail1.85362086.com [107.174.64.25]) by mail.z572.online (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e462e0be (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 15:54:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Zheng Junjie To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] gnu: xsimd: Update to 13.2.0. Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:48:27 +0800 Message-ID: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.49.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Debbugs-Cc: Greg Hogan Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=88.99.160.180; envelope-from=z572@z572.online; helo=mail.z572.online X-Spam_score_int: 19 X-Spam_score: 1.9 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=2, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.474, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/cpp.scm (xsimd): Update to 13.2.0. Change-Id: I86e3d2e8138c10f48b8acebda8751be2727a7364 --- gnu/packages/cpp.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/cpp.scm b/gnu/packages/cpp.scm index 8d482d1fbd4..c59dce41afd 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/cpp.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/cpp.scm @@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ (define-public debug-assert (de [...] Content analysis details: (4.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.5 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: z572.online (online)] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 2.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/cpp.scm (xsimd): Update to 13.2.0. Change-Id: I86e3d2e8138c10f48b8acebda8751be2727a7364 --- gnu/packages/cpp.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/cpp.scm b/gnu/packages/cpp.scm index 8d482d1fbd4..c59dce41afd 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/cpp.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/cpp.scm @@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ (define-public debug-assert (de [...] Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.5 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: z572.online (online)] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager * gnu/packages/cpp.scm (xsimd): Update to 13.2.0. Change-Id: I86e3d2e8138c10f48b8acebda8751be2727a7364 --- gnu/packages/cpp.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/cpp.scm b/gnu/packages/cpp.scm index 8d482d1fbd4..c59dce41afd 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/cpp.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/cpp.scm @@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ (define-public debug-assert (define-public xsimd (package (name "xsimd") - (version "11.0.0") + (version "13.2.0") (source (origin (method git-fetch) @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ (define-public xsimd (url "https://github.com/xtensor-stack/xsimd") (commit version))) (sha256 - (base32 "148wylv88vp31rz7l357ch7k0l50apfk4x31qdqk9y4d2hj6ld3f")) + (base32 "1w3hffv5yr1xdl3f46dnnza3kixfgj13450181qf7spq2cknv2rg")) (file-name (git-file-name name version)))) (build-system cmake-build-system) (arguments base-commit: cf87c55d8a1d67621277ead305e8e77c2ddb64c5 prerequisite-patch-id: 1942022db74ec81607b95d53ed533f60a113c425 prerequisite-patch-id: fe3284f1495e7e01626ae078d44dba1c66efbd89 -- 2.49.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 15 06:03:56 2025 Received: (at 77183) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2025 10:03:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50794 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u4d92-0006lO-Gp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 06:03:56 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:50704) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u4d8z-0006kw-Cx for 77183@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 06:03:53 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B38304; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:03:46 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id VUG9yjS5ZR-k; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:03:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ribbon (unknown [193.50.110.57]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FE9C285; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:03:42 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Zheng Junjie Subject: Re: [bug#77183] [PATCH] gnu: xsimd: Update to 13.2.0. In-Reply-To: (Zheng Junjie's message of "Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:48:27 +0800") References: Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:01:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87h62phhf5.fsf@chbouib.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 74B38304 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.90 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Zheng Junjie writes: > * gnu/packages/cpp.scm (xsimd): Update to 13.2.0. > > Change-Id: I86e3d2e8138c10f48b8acebda8751be2727a7364 QA hasn’t processed it yet, but I would say that if it passes ‘guix build -P1 xsimd’, you can go ahead and push it. Content analysis details: (2.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [185.233.100.1 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [185.233.100.1 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: z572.online (online)] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 77183 Cc: 77183@debbugs.gnu.org, Greg Hogan X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Zheng Junjie writes: > * gnu/packages/cpp.scm (xsimd): Update to 13.2.0. > > Change-Id: I86e3d2e8138c10f48b8acebda8751be2727a7364 QA hasn’t processed it yet, but I would say that if it passes ‘guix build -P1 xsimd’, you can go ahead and push it. Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [185.233.100.1 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [185.233.100.1 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: z572.online (online)] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Zheng Junjie writes: > * gnu/packages/cpp.scm (xsimd): Update to 13.2.0. > > Change-Id: I86e3d2e8138c10f48b8acebda8751be2727a7364 QA hasn=E2=80=99t processed it yet, but I would say that if it passes =E2= =80=98guix build -P1 xsimd=E2=80=99, you can go ahead and push it. Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 23:35:05 2025 Received: (at 77183-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2025 03:35:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42476 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u74PZ-000252-9a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:35:05 -0400 Received: from mail.z572.online ([88.99.160.180]:45434) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1u74PW-00024U-64 for 77183-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:35:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=z572.online; s=me; t=1745293295; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8cln444VihXstGuvsDzQTHnA8RyBwxoK0Dlx1FyNhfU=; b=ZzSpGbUzE/pE88sOB4BN43U7FBXluKJu5U/XmtsQzVAUrgm+I155wj+ji5DgtIw8aV5hqN pPtXMaRNvFy7tRWsYpVamv23znTYyu+lrS0Yq1vQdeoqXGOcGSWvN6evY/FksmVgVp9iH1 ND+2W74CyNNDWfbPgYxIqdtZ8R1c8xs= Received: from m (mail1.85362086.com [107.174.64.25]) by mail.z572.online (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id d538ad76 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 22 Apr 2025 03:41:34 +0000 (UTC) From: Z572 To: 77183-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#77183] [PATCH] gnu: xsimd: Update to 13.2.0. In-Reply-To: (Zheng Junjie's message of "Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:48:27 +0800") References: User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 30.0.92 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:34:52 +0800 Message-ID: <87jz7ceun7.fsf@z572.online> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Forgot to close. Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: z572.online (online)] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [88.99.160.180 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [88.99.160.180 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 77183-done Cc: Greg Hogan X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Forgot to close. Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [88.99.160.180 listed in sa-trusted.bondedsender.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [88.99.160.180 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: z572.online (online)] 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Forgot to close. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfr6klGDOXiwIdX/bO1qpk+Gi3/AFAmgHDlwACgkQO1qpk+Gi 3/DgmRAAnX+PBD1b5ujeDHZrdxZ1L//mZHNoYlKzXOKNGDyZo8Zjm7dISO7s3wJv IWLexIQh/6R9tJ2L83mAM155gzHYCj8rMXhq59z7zIeUSu0Vg3QwoNVK5wMsa/SU gG/9P7KQmZMpJmMhFXAYjTN7ekMf5E3rWzVplPssBb7t0paK3/CBoMAdhREZ/eu3 HbyvLbpTEAlqovUBwMY0zaFJ6A9mxT3uOoXdTW7lWx1/wn7tnR74rmqOck7ond1E U1wrkilda05YIHvSgvADQzUell4U2z6Iqpif48WY3ZUP3x7XnSB+ERjHY5bOwvh2 sPKyKKBloTfJj1bRUiRdnDEtSf7xIBjOgFfh/wryXxdIE4U4XvS5BsuKEfj2ynHl gGWoK2FBttK9rZdC76nLKubXiYi5F59PHhqrJ0S7YBQGluwp7//RWwQmwhDOwngq Iiru81DvRlzfBXMQMqCIblrYsuzLK56MQn0/6z1twVxmFPIDkGBQVd8FXXwU0rIo nKHuRFMm+VPJj5YxqWCZ2ytHZysKBgjnOnsxAIvq46LKcrt8BLa8xqgh16YeNxU+ MVGwqARiBulm2w1ZHdv1/ENeK/UtGsYOD55mu6c87R4yKBqPqP6jFCGXAoYuj6T/ e9GZiCn45YwUtD1can9KpbMMeya/zmiUY5tc3P6xxgPB7yd3WnA= =EXBM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Thu Aug 14 21:51:39 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 11:24:22 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator