GNU bug report logs - #77169
[PATCH] New Eldoc function `help-at-pt-eldoc-function'

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Daniel Mendler <mail <at> daniel-mendler.de>

Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 09:41:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Daniel Mendler <mail <at> daniel-mendler.de>
Cc: 77169 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#77169: [PATCH] New Eldoc function `help-at-pt-eldoc-function'
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 14:46:26 +0200
> From: Daniel Mendler <mail <at> daniel-mendler.de>
> Cc: 77169 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 12:29:13 +0100
> 
> > Thanks, but please also reflect this feature in the doc string of
> > help-at-pt-display-when-idle and in the Emacs user manual (where that
> > option is described).
> 
> The question is if `help-at-pt-display-when-idle' should be marked
> obsolete in favor of the Eldoc mechanism to avoid conflicts. Eldoc is
> even preloaded these days, so the de-facto standard for documentation at
> point.

Users can still disable ElDoc, and if they do, perhaps they would like
to have help-at-pt-display-when-idle.

We could start the process of obsoleting help-at-pt-display-when-idle,
if we think it should be superseded by ElDoc, but that process takes
time, and in the meantime we should assume people are still using
help-at-pt-display-when-idle and need to be aware of the replacement,
and vice versa.

> > Also, shouldn't we have a user option to turn this on in ElDoc?
> 
> Not sure if we need an option given that it is easy to add the function
> to the list, or remove it, if the function is enabled by default.

It might be easy fore you and me, but not for users who are not Lisp
programmers.

Thanks.




This bug report was last modified 53 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.