GNU bug report logs - #77113
[PATCH] Use default print settings in nnfeed--write-server

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#77113: closed ([PATCH] Use default print settings in
 nnfeed--write-server)
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 10:38:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2025 13:36:52 +0300
with message-id <86ldsex5bv.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#77113: [PATCH] Use default print settings in nnfeed--write-server
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #77113,
regarding [PATCH] Use default print settings in nnfeed--write-server
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
77113: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=77113
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Use default print settings in nnfeed--write-server
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:49:06 +0530

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

I suppose it'd be possible to construct an adversarial example that
would cause the current code to fail, but this should be
uncontroversial. I've had occassional problems that it seems to fix.

Ref:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnus-english/2025-03/msg00020.html

[0001-lisp-gnus-nnfeed-el--nnfeed--write-server.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (text/plain, inline)]

--

[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Daniel Semyonov <daniel <at> dsemy.com>
Cc: 77113-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jimjoe <at> gmx.net
Subject: Re: bug#77113: [PATCH] Use default print settings in
 nnfeed--write-server
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 13:36:52 +0300

> From: Daniel Semyonov <daniel <at> dsemy.com>
> Cc: James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>,  77113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 12:00:57 +0300
> 
> >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes:
> 
>     >> Cc: daniel <at> dsemy.com
>     >> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:49:06 +0530
>     >> From:  James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>     >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>     >> 
>     >> I suppose it'd be possible to construct an adversarial example that
>     >> would cause the current code to fail, but this should be
>     >> uncontroversial. I've had occassional problems that it seems to fix.
>     >> 
>     >> Ref:
>     >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnus-english/2025-03/msg00020.html
> 
>     > Daniel, any comments?
> 
> Yes, this should be applied.
> Sorry I thought I already replied to this, but I replied on the Gnus
> mailing list.

Thanks, done, and closing the bug.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.