GNU bug report logs - #77093
[PATCH rust-team 00/18] New Rust packaging workflow based on lockfile importer.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #92 received at 77093 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Hilton Chain <hako <at> ultrarare.space>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>,	Hilton Chain
 <hako <at> ultrarare.space>,	77093 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,	Christopher Baines
 <guix <at> cbaines.net>,	Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>,	Ludovic
 Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>,	Mathieu Othacehe
 <othacehe <at> gnu.org>,	Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>,	Tobias
 Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Subject: Re: [bug#77093] [PATCH rust-team 11/18] scripts: import: Support
 expressions defined by 'define.
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 20:29:49 +0800

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 19:49:39 +0800,
Efraim Flashner wrote:
>
> [1  <text/plain; utf-8 (quoted-printable)>]
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 03:24:24PM +0800, Hilton Chain wrote:
> > * guix/utils.scm (find-definition-location): New procedure.
> > (find-definition-insertion-location): Define with it.
> > * guix/scripts/import.scm (import-as-definitions, guix-import): Support
> > expressions defined by 'define.
> >
> > Change-Id: I03118e1a3372028b4f0530964aba871b4a1a4d25
> > ---
> >  guix/scripts/import.scm | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
> >  guix/utils.scm          | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/guix/scripts/import.scm b/guix/scripts/import.scm
> > index 58a84d0db7..aaa3d26673 100644
> > --- a/guix/scripts/import.scm
> > +++ b/guix/scripts/import.scm
> > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ (define-module (guix scripts import)
> >    #:use-module (guix read-print)
> >    #:use-module (guix utils)
> >    #:use-module (srfi srfi-1)
> > +  #:use-module (srfi srfi-26)
> >    #:use-module (ice-9 format)
> >    #:use-module (ice-9 match)
> >    #:export (%standard-import-options
> > @@ -83,7 +84,8 @@ (define (import-as-definitions importer args proc)
> >          ((and expr (or ('package _ ...)
> >                         ('let _ ...)))
> >           (proc (package->definition expr)))
> > -        ((and expr ('define-public _ ...))
> > +        ((and expr (or ('define-public _ ...)
> > +                       ('define _ ...)))
> >           (proc expr))
> >          ((expressions ...)
> >           (for-each (lambda (expr)
> > @@ -91,7 +93,8 @@ (define (import-as-definitions importer args proc)
> >                         ((and expr (or ('package _ ...)
> >                                        ('let _ ...)))
> >                          (proc (package->definition expr)))
> > -                       ((and expr ('define-public _ ...))
> > +                       ((and expr (or ('define-public _ ...)
> > +                                      ('define _ ...)))
> >                          (proc expr))))
> >                     expressions))
> >          (x
> > @@ -117,13 +120,20 @@ (define-command (guix-import . args)
> >       (show-version-and-exit "guix import"))
> >      ((or ("-i" file importer args ...)
> >           ("--insert" file importer args ...))
> > -     (let ((find-and-insert
> > +     (let* ((definer?
> > +              (cut member
> > +                   <>
> > +                   `(,@(if (member importer '("crate"))
> > +                           '(define)
> > +                           '())
> > +                     define-public)))
>
> This part above seems like it would break the option to use 'guix import
> crate' with the --insert flag for "normal" packages.  I question how
> useful it currently is in that scenario since we normally have to strip
> the rust- prefix from those packages anyway.

Hmmm, since the crate importer now checks both ‘define’ and ‘define-public’,
there might be ordering issue when the module to insert uses ‘define’.  But it's
still managable I think.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.