GNU bug report logs - #77066
[PATCH 0/3] Update boost variant URIs to be consistent and valid

Previous Next

Full log

Message #25 received at 77066 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ada Stevenson <adanskana <at> gmail.com>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>, Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com>, 
 77066 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, divya <at> subvertising.org, steve <at> futurile.net
Subject: Re: [bug#77066] [PATCH 1/3] gnu: boost-for-source-highlight: Update
 source URI
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 06:22:18 +0000

Hi,

I don't believe this triggers a rebuild, since the source hash is the 
same. Running on my local system, Guix still reached for the 
substitutes, despite the changed package definition.

On 17/03/2025 3:13 pm, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 09:03:20AM -0400, Greg Hogan wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 4:17 AM Ada Stevenson <adanskana <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> * gnu/packages/boost.scm (boost-for-source-highlight)
>>> [source] <uri>: Update dead link to active link.
>>>
>>> Change-Id: Ib10a2ef6b57bc787a34d62eaaa0885a5dcd0a1a8
>>> ---
>>>   gnu/packages/boost.scm | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/boost.scm b/gnu/packages/boost.scm
>>> index e464400ad9..cb45b2efd9 100644
>>> --- a/gnu/packages/boost.scm
>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/boost.scm
>>> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ (define-public boost-for-source-highlight
>>>       (version "1.83.0")
>>>       (source (origin
>>>                 (method url-fetch)
>>> -              (uri (string-append "https://boostorg.jfrog.io/artifactory/main/release/"
>>> +              (uri (string-append "https://archives.boost.io/release/"
>>>                                     version "/source/boost_"
>>>                                     (version-with-underscores version) ".tar.bz2"))
>>>                 (patches
>>> --
>>> 2.48.1
>>
>> cc'ing the rust team because source-highlight has ~12,000 dependent
>> packages, nearly all due to gdb/pinned which is a dependency of rust.
> 
> Does this cause a rebuild of anything?  If it doesn't then it should be
> fine for master.  If it does cause rebuilds then we can grab it for the
> rust-team branch (or another one even).
> 

-- 
Warmly,
Ada

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.