GNU bug report logs - #77029
[PATCH] gnu: rizin: Update to 0.7.4.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 77029 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 77029 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: iyzsong <at> envs.net
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: rizin: Update to 0.7.4.
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 18:54:02 +0800

From: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org>

* gnu/packages/engineering.scm (rizin): Update to 0.7.4.

Change-Id: I9c8e44e195e675d027e06380ee7e977ddcea72f7
---
 gnu/packages/engineering.scm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/engineering.scm b/gnu/packages/engineering.scm
index f7b8642432..775d46a648 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/engineering.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/engineering.scm
@@ -5039,7 +5039,7 @@ (define-public candle
 (define-public rizin
   (package
     (name "rizin")
-    (version "0.7.2")
+    (version "0.7.4")
     (source (origin
               (method url-fetch)
               (uri (string-append
@@ -5047,7 +5047,7 @@ (define-public rizin
                     version "/rizin-src-v" version ".tar.xz"))
               (sha256
                (base32
-                "0ajqng66b01phs0hjygg9phyc8p3fs0a1isbc0zmxdz2bas3zzzw"))))
+                "008jcfbp836g2sya4aqkbkfir6h1xhq0pq53p8w3r16wwl88j4gp"))))
     (build-system meson-build-system)
     (arguments
      (list

base-commit: 1bf1daac77316898d716c27968e4100d8ce464fb
-- 
2.48.1

Message #8 received at 77029 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org>
To: GNU bug tracker automated control server <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Cc: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org>,
 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>, 77029 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 iyzsong <at> envs.net
Subject: control message for bug #77029
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 18:55:06 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

user guix
usertag 77029 + waiting-on-contributor
thanks

Items marked as checked:

- commit messages
- package builds
- lint warnings
- package style
- one dependent package build
- synopsis and descriptions

All licenses in the LICENSES folder should probably appear as a list in
the license field, instead of a comment right above.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #13 received at 77029-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>
To: Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org>
Cc: 77029-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#77029] control message for bug #77029
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 10:59:11 +0800

Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org> writes:

> user guix
> usertag 77029 + waiting-on-contributor
> thanks

Pushed, thank you for review.

Message #16 received at 77029-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org>
Cc: GNU bug tracker automated control server <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>,
 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org>, 77029-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 iyzsong <at> envs.net
Subject: Re: control message for bug #77029
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 15:27:31 +0900

Hello!

Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org> writes:

> user guix
> usertag 77029 + waiting-on-contributor
> thanks

I think there is some convention to use the 'reviewed-looks-good'
usertag for your future reviews, see (info "(guix) Debbugs Usertags").

I see this has already been closed by Sou.  Thanks for reviewing!

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #19 received at 77029 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org>, 77029 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 iyzsong <at> envs.net
Subject: Re: control message for bug #77029
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:32:09 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

>dim. 16 mars 2025 at 15:27, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> I think there is some convention to use the 'reviewed-looks-good'
> usertag for your future reviews, see (info "(guix) Debbugs Usertags").

Except when it doesn’t ...😀

The "waiting-on-contributor" referred to the fact that the licences
appear as comments, not as a proper listing, and this update was the
opportunity to fix this.

We can live without, anyway.

C.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #22 received at 77029 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org>
Cc: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org>, 77029 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 iyzsong <at> envs.net
Subject: Re: control message for bug #77029
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:11:37 +0900

Hi,

Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org> writes:

>>dim. 16 mars 2025 at 15:27, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think there is some convention to use the 'reviewed-looks-good'
>> usertag for your future reviews, see (info "(guix) Debbugs Usertags").
>
> Except when it doesn’t ...😀
>
> The "waiting-on-contributor" referred to the fact that the licences
> appear as comments, not as a proper listing, and this update was the
> opportunity to fix this.
>
> We can live without, anyway.

OK ^^'.  In general, I find it more useful, as a user, to have a license
field that lists the combined work (as built and linked) license under
which I can use the software rather than an exhaustive list of every
different license found in the project (though that's also useful to
control whether there are any licensing incompatibilities in the
project).

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.