GNU bug report logs - #76978
31.0.50; Archive information not displayed for installed packages in *Packages* buffer

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: david <davidimagid <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 13:25:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 31.0.50

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 76978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, david <davidimagid <at> gmail.com>, Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#76978: [PATCH] package.el: Add built-in version check and loaded package marking
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 16:45:44 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
No
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 16:36 Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 16:26 Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> > With the patch in https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=76568
>> > duplicates will be harder to install.
>>
>> They're still easy to have (e.g. install some packages system-wide and
>> then let the users install other versions in their home dir), and that's
>> a good thing: we want to support setups with several versions installed
>> at the same time.  Of course, users usually don't want that, so it's
>> good to make sure it doesn't happen by accident.  In any case, my
>> question was simply to confirm that I understood correctly the
>> information that's displayed.
>
>
> Maybe I should change the patch to prompt for allowing a dupe install if
> that's what someone wants?
>

Hmm. Maybe it already does. Not at my computer.

>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 87 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.