GNU bug report logs - #76758
31.0.50; edebug-no-match: Invalid read syntax: "Failed matching"

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Martin Edström" <meedstrom <at> runbox.eu>

Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 08:46:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Found in version 31.0.50

Done: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #8 received at 76758 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
To: Martin Edström <meedstrom <at> runbox.eu>
Cc: 76758 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#76758: 31.0.50; edebug-no-match: Invalid read syntax:
 "Failed matching"
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 15:21:40 +0100
"Martin Edström" <meedstrom <at> runbox.eu> writes:

> Steps:
> 1. git clone -b bug-1 https://github.com/meedstrom/el-job
> 2. emacs -Q el-job/
> 3. Load el-job-child.el
> 4. Load el-job.el
> 5. Go to the definition of el-job-launch
> 6. M-x edebug-defun
>
> I get this result:
>
> edebug-no-match: Invalid read syntax: "Failed matching", ("cl-defun"
> [&name symbolp] cl-lambda-list cl-declarations-or-string [&optional
> ("interactive" interactive)] def-body)

Despite the error message - could it be that there is a problem with
your edebug spec of `el-job--with'?  The call of this macro seems to be
the location where instrumenting fails.


Michael.




This bug report was last modified 77 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.