From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 16 12:34:37 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2010 17:34:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTHiv-0006mw-3d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:34:37 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTHis-0006mk-31 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:34:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTHoy-0000MF-MO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:40:53 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:54284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTHoy-0000MA-I8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:40:52 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56379 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTHox-0002eJ-EH for bug-automake@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:40:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTHow-0000Lu-E6 for bug-automake@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:40:51 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:56216) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTHow-0000Lo-3Q for bug-automake@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:40:50 -0500 Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so2549577wwb.30 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:40:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=LMkzoM/h3Dcq2RzOvS1VucftCxozvo1vYMFI/M4ywEc=; b=jwOfUP2YB7KCNzZ7HwAOaDn21yGgiaKXLfZ11guLy4YdbsrqWkGkVZmolId90RTELV a7Q9x2Kmn7E6Z8aMG/KTqxZ082BpFr8I/g9SmpJ+uEJO4S7vf81hYZtFQUeZekuuAeIW wdxtQ5M9FzswOqyP2mt3cBcsNNXIrV1piYLgs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=nFWmTEbqq61wlZTVsMEo+fUEWr9hSql20fvsLVLIIKGNITzH5bHWA54UH72G4EzS99 t7vgodwfuPVrXmO77vy2QtR/S2Ggi1CQ+qruNyDD9q8mqOX6HgnEH1YnfmvjYdx4z2YC COgzR90DQGmNf/GBHZCKrq/nGznEwONbN7O4E= Received: by 10.227.144.12 with SMTP id x12mr2869017wbu.102.1292521248855; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:40:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from bigio.localnet (host209-92-dynamic.248-95-r.retail.telecomitalia.it [95.248.92.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 11sm235340wbi.6.2010.12.16.09.40.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:40:48 -0800 (PST) From: Stefano Lattarini To: bug-automake@gnu.org Subject: docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of primaries in the automake manual? Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:40:37 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201012161840.37949.stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) The subjects says it all, basically. In section "3.3 The Uniform Naming Scheme" I read: ``The current primary names are =E2=80=98PROGRAMS=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98LIBRA= RIES=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98LISP=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98PYTHON=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98JAVA=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98SCRIPTS=E2=80= =99, =E2=80=98DATA=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98HEADERS=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98MANS=E2=80= =99, and =E2=80=98TEXINFOS=E2=80=99. Some primaries also allow additional prefixe= s that control other aspects of automake's behavior. ...'' Shouldn't `LTLIBRARIES' be listed here too? Or am I missing something? Regards, Stefano From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 16 13:04:48 2010 Received: (at 7654) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2010 18:04:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTIC8-0007VX-Kd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:04:48 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22] helo=mail.gmx.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTIC6-0007VL-29 for 7654@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:04:47 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2010 18:11:03 -0000 Received: from xdsl-89-0-145-130.netcologne.de (EHLO localhost.localdomain) [89.0.145.130] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 16 Dec 2010 19:11:03 +0100 X-Authenticated: #13673931 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19+E1cTwoB+TyxBOvvwxt5CqjWTF0LqjZrATfljTl H/ulUq7u6LPfoi Received: from ralf by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTIIA-0000Dw-D9; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:11:02 +0100 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:11:02 +0100 From: Ralf Wildenhues To: Stefano Lattarini Subject: Re: bug#7654: docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of primaries in the automake manual? Message-ID: <20101216181102.GA831@gmx.de> References: <201012161840.37949.stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201012161840.37949.stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Organization: Institute for Numerical Simulation, University of Bonn User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7654 Cc: 7654@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:40:37PM CET: > In section "3.3 The Uniform Naming Scheme" I read: > > ``The current primary names are ‘PROGRAMS’, ‘LIBRARIES’, ‘LISP’, > ‘PYTHON’, ‘JAVA’, ‘SCRIPTS’, ‘DATA’, ‘HEADERS’, ‘MANS’, and > ‘TEXINFOS’. Some primaries also allow additional prefixes that > control other aspects of automake's behavior. ...'' > > Shouldn't `LTLIBRARIES' be listed here too? Yes. The obvious patch is preapproved. Thanks, Ralf From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 16 13:48:47 2010 Received: (at 7654-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2010 18:48:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTIsh-00012o-1H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:48:47 -0500 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTIsf-00012d-DW for 7654-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:48:45 -0500 Received: by eye27 with SMTP id 27so2216252eye.19 for <7654-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:55:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=CORnjN/ggZno8R6welCxQrmdERP3oU2O7qXaHPf+iXo=; b=wmI13g8891u6V15xs4vZNB5H67DqDH3fbm3xTDz6LC0QEMcgqiwuob2/yaK8tve6Be m25BypO45AFssg7oAg4VSWcyH/+mKNaBnBIRsoDFnbOxVVEMVg2J86+rnsN7qyd9sDM8 fNTlsOnmPT4UqswiWuWXJRdwylSU05WJF6CJ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=ikXxwdfhOf9SCoHM9sfVUXkLZsy6DuEf2waMUKybtrMt4/oSn/b3WO5fptSRbzyYZn /JB4z+Ab2H+YVrz1/ucy2LU9DzKfg8ZF6UykDwVtzekJIkkXkKfGIamUeQSIk5uaxl80 ii8WDJJyF2ElDQxHcsYSCpWGLvQBUk8Pdx+FY= Received: by 10.216.19.66 with SMTP id m44mr536079wem.86.1292525704335; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:55:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from bigio.localnet (host209-92-dynamic.248-95-r.retail.telecomitalia.it [95.248.92.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n1sm213292weq.7.2010.12.16.10.55.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:55:03 -0800 (PST) From: Stefano Lattarini To: Ralf Wildenhues , automake-patches@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#7654: docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of primaries in the automake manual? Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:54:21 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) References: <201012161840.37949.stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> <20101216181102.GA831@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20101216181102.GA831@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201012161954.22074.stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7654-done Cc: 7654-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:40:37PM CET: > > In section "3.3 The Uniform Naming Scheme" I read: > >=20 > > ``The current primary names are =E2=80=98PROGRAMS=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98L= IBRARIES=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98LISP=E2=80=99, > > =E2=80=98PYTHON=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98JAVA=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98SCRIPTS= =E2=80=99, =E2=80=98DATA=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98HEADERS=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98MANS= =E2=80=99, and > > =E2=80=98TEXINFOS=E2=80=99. Some primaries also allow additional pre= fixes that > > control other aspects of automake's behavior. ...'' > >=20 > > Shouldn't `LTLIBRARIES' be listed here too? >=20 > Yes. The obvious patch is preapproved. >=20 > Thanks, > Ralf >=20 This is what I pushed to maint. Regards, Stefano =2D*-*-*- docs: list LTLIBRARIES among Automake primaries * doc/automake.texi (Uniform): List `LTLIBRARIES' among the Automake primaries. =2D-- ChangeLog | 6 ++++++ doc/automake.texi | 6 ++++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 2482ef1..3eee3a7 100644 =2D-- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2010-12-16 Stefano Lattarini + + docs: list LTLIBRARIES among Automake primaries + * doc/automake.texi (Uniform): List `LTLIBRARIES' among + the Automake primaries. + 2010-12-14 Stefano Lattarini =20 Improve tests on generated portions of configure help screen. diff --git a/doc/automake.texi b/doc/automake.texi index 5a805b3..227b1ba 100644 =2D-- a/doc/automake.texi +++ b/doc/automake.texi @@ -2024,10 +2024,12 @@ should not be built until the @samp{make check} com= mand is run. Those objects are not installed either. =20 The current primary names are @samp{PROGRAMS}, @samp{LIBRARIES}, =2D@samp{LISP}, @samp{PYTHON}, @samp{JAVA}, @samp{SCRIPTS}, @samp{DATA}, =2D@samp{HEADERS}, @samp{MANS}, and @samp{TEXINFOS}. +@samp{LTLIBRARIES}, @samp{LISP}, @samp{PYTHON}, @samp{JAVA}, +@samp{SCRIPTS}, @samp{DATA}, @samp{HEADERS}, @samp{MANS}, and +@samp{TEXINFOS}. @vindex PROGRAMS @vindex LIBRARIES +@vindex LTLIBRARIES @vindex LISP @vindex PYTHON @vindex JAVA =2D-=20 1.7.1 From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:16:13 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator