GNU bug report logs -
#76538
31.0.50; 31.0.50; 31.0.50; feature/igc: using magit-section-cycle-global (S-TAB) and magit-section-toggle (TAB) in some random ways blocks GNU Emacs.
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
> Cc: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> protonmail.com>, for <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Bug <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
> =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o <at> debbugs.gnu.org, GNU <at> debbugs.gnu.org, via <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
> reports <at> debbugs.gnu.org, joaomoreira <at> gmx.se, 76538 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
> Emacs <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>
> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:12:21 +0000
>
> The reproducer involves 20+Mb magit buffer with a lot of text hidden.
> I toyed around with gdb a bit, and it appears to me that the problem is
> not with the number of markers. Rather an opposite. Marker cache does
> not help here initially and we need to scan all the way through 20Mb of
> bytes.
??? AFAIR, we perform binary search there, no?
Can you show the details of what you saw in GDB?
> In my testing, I looked into the total number of markers in the buffer,
> and it appears that the number is always fairly small.
How small?
> May someone more familiar with the code check if markers created in
> buf_charpos_to_bytepos might be created and immediately GCed? That's my
> impression (maybe totally wrong).
Why is the immediate GC a problem? And why do you think there is an
immediate GC? And finally, are we still talking about the igc branch
or about master (or both)?
This bug report was last modified 105 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.