GNU bug report logs - #76529
[PATCH] gnu: emacs: Update to 30.1

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith <at> outlook.com>

Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:05:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #25 received at 76529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith <at> outlook.com>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>, 76529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Andrew Tropin <andrew <at> trop.in>,
 Divya Ranjan Pattanaik <divya <at> subvertising.org>, Ian Eure <ian <at> retrospec.tv>
Subject: Re: [bug#76529] [PATCH] gnu: emacs-next-minimal: Update to 30.1-rc1.
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 18:04:01 -0500
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Am Montag, dem 24.02.2025 um 14:53 -0500 schrieb Morgan Smith:
>> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-next-minimal): Update to 30.1-rc1.
>> [phases]: Work around the phase 'patch-program-file-names' expecting
>> the file "lisp/obsolete/terminal.el" in the same way that guile-emacs
>> does.
> Since emacs-next-minimal is soon-to-become emacs proper, perhaps we
> should instead replace ‘patch-program-file-names’.  WDYT?

I did not realize Emacs had a new release as of yesterday.  I suppose
that was something I was supposed to check before sending in this patch
:P.

Anyways enjoy the new patch series I sent to update emacs.

Do we have some patch QA thing running at the moment?  I'm curious how
much my patch series ruins everything.

>> (emacs->emacs-next)[phases]: Add the same workaround as above.
>> 
>> Change-Id: Ia83ee362fb70ec437b6930ae661b76cb14589b0b
>> ---
>> 
>> Installed this locally on my system.  Everything works as expected. 
>> It can find the eln files just fine.  Used it to native compile my
>> local manifest of Emacs packages and loaded those.  Everything worked
>> great.  It found those eln files.  None of the eln files have a hash
>> in their filename (as expected).
>> 
>> Honestly I was expecting to have to adjust the patches so I am
>> pleasantly surprised.
> SGTM :)
>
> Cheers




This bug report was last modified 107 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.