GNU bug report logs -
#76529
[PATCH] gnu: emacs: Update to 30.1
Previous Next
Reported by: Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith <at> outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:05:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #25 received at 76529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Am Montag, dem 24.02.2025 um 14:53 -0500 schrieb Morgan Smith:
>> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-next-minimal): Update to 30.1-rc1.
>> [phases]: Work around the phase 'patch-program-file-names' expecting
>> the file "lisp/obsolete/terminal.el" in the same way that guile-emacs
>> does.
> Since emacs-next-minimal is soon-to-become emacs proper, perhaps we
> should instead replace ‘patch-program-file-names’. WDYT?
I did not realize Emacs had a new release as of yesterday. I suppose
that was something I was supposed to check before sending in this patch
:P.
Anyways enjoy the new patch series I sent to update emacs.
Do we have some patch QA thing running at the moment? I'm curious how
much my patch series ruins everything.
>> (emacs->emacs-next)[phases]: Add the same workaround as above.
>>
>> Change-Id: Ia83ee362fb70ec437b6930ae661b76cb14589b0b
>> ---
>>
>> Installed this locally on my system. Everything works as expected.
>> It can find the eln files just fine. Used it to native compile my
>> local manifest of Emacs packages and loaded those. Everything worked
>> great. It found those eln files. None of the eln files have a hash
>> in their filename (as expected).
>>
>> Honestly I was expecting to have to adjust the patches so I am
>> pleasantly surprised.
> SGTM :)
>
> Cheers
This bug report was last modified 107 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.