Package: emacs;
Reported by: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 06:10:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Fixed in version 23.2.91
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Message #35 received at 7651 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> To: handa <at> m17n.org Cc: 7651 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 17:26:40 +0200
> Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:00:44 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: 7651 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> Thanks. I just started using it. It is much better now. I have only
> a couple of minor issues to report so far:
Here's one more problem, a more serious one. The message reproduced
below, posted today to emacs-devel, is by default displayed with no
body at all for the 1st part, like this (indentation added):
From: David Kuehling <dvdkhlng <at> gmx.de>
To: Ken Raeburn <raeburn <at> raeburn.org>
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 15:20:58 +0100
Cc: rms <at> gnu.org, Emacs Dev <emacs-devel <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Some OpenWrt port related problems
[1:multipart/signed]
[2:application/pgp-signature file:noname (189B)]
I guess we need to handle parts with no Content-Type at all?
Here's the original message, copied from the RMAIL buffer after
toggling the display with `v' (again, indentation added):
From emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org <at> gnu.org Sat Jan 01 09:21:30 2011
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org <at> gnu.org>
Envelope-to: eliz <at> gnu.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:30 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50257)
by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org <at> gnu.org>)
id 1PZ2Ko-0003mt-2D
for eliz <at> gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:30 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org <at> gnu.org>)
id 1PZ2Kq-00016f-DO
for eliz <at> gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:33 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_MIME_NO_TEXT autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:57125)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org <at> gnu.org>)
id 1PZ2Kp-00016U-KE
for eliz <at> gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:31 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54155 helo=lists.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1PZ2Kp-0005ny-FW
for eliz <at> gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:31 -0500
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33845 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZ2KU-0005ns-Ld
for emacs-devel <at> gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <dvdkhlng <at> gmx.de>) id 1PZ2KS-0000ys-P1
for emacs-devel <at> gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:10 -0500
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:56759 helo=mail.gmx.net)
by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <dvdkhlng <at> gmx.de>) id 1PZ2KS-0000yf-CX
for emacs-devel <at> gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:08 -0500
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Jan 2011 14:21:05 -0000
Received: from g225041162.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO snail.gmx.de) [92.225.41.162]
by mail.gmx.net (mp045) with SMTP; 01 Jan 2011 15:21:05 +0100
X-Authenticated: #4121607
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1//MpsRJHX/GjPLea+HpHz6pI07dsTdZCK9rl/RiR
Tae4tRtlRKjlu2
From: David Kuehling <dvdkhlng <at> gmx.de>
To: Ken Raeburn <raeburn <at> raeburn.org>
References: <87sjxi5hko.fsf <at> snail.Pool>
<jwvr5d1lmo6.fsf-monnier+emacs <at> gnu.org> <87lj39y52n.fsf <at> snail.Pool>
<E1PXql5-0005hB-0s <at> fencepost.gnu.org> <87pqsl7wt7.fsf <at> snail.Pool>
<66798668-5808-473B-BF11-DF4DBA5464A1 <at> raeburn.org>
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 15:20:58 +0100
In-Reply-To: <66798668-5808-473B-BF11-DF4DBA5464A1 <at> raeburn.org> (Ken Raeburn's
message of "Wed, 29 Dec 2010 23:08:09 -0500")
Message-ID: <8739pc9039.fsf <at> snail.Pool>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
Cc: rms <at> gnu.org, Emacs Dev <emacs-devel <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Some OpenWrt port related problems
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel <at> gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
<mailto:emacs-devel-request <at> gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel <at> gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request <at> gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
<mailto:emacs-devel-request <at> gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org <at> gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org <at> gnu.org
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2)
X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES: --------
--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>>>> "Ken" =3D=3D Ken Raeburn <raeburn <at> raeburn.org> writes:
> On Dec 29, 2010, at 04:28, David Kuehling wrote:
>> I could dump Emacs in the target system, from a wrapper script, when
>> launched for the first time. But last time I tried that it failed
>> with insufficient memory (32Mb RAM, no swap), so I'm going without
>> dumping for now.
> It sounds like running Emacs on such a system is going to be pretty
> marginal in any case, but do you recall what part of it failed?
> Finding the doc strings? The actual dumping?
Ok, just recompiled emacs with dumping support, and running
$ emacs -Q --batch --eval \
'(dump-emacs "./demacs" "/usr/bin/emacs")'
on the NanoNote gave me:
[..]
Loading ediff-hook...
Finding pointers to doc strings...
Finding pointers to doc strings...done
emacs: Can't allocate buffer for /usr/bin/emacs
So it wants to pull a full copy of the emacs binary into memory?
This problem I can workaround by changing the Linux overcommit setting,
but then dumping fails with another problem:
$ echo "1" > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory=20
$ emacs -Q --batch --eval \
'(dump-emacs "./demacs" "/usr/bin/emacs")'
[..]
Finding pointers to doc strings...
Finding pointers to doc strings...done
emacs: Program segment above .bss in /usr/bin/emacs
So what's that supposed to mean?=20=20
cheers,
David
=2D-=20
GnuPG public key: http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~dvdkhlng/dk.gpg
Fingerprint: B17A DC95 D293 657B 4205 D016 7DEF 5323 C174 7D40
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFNHzhLfe9TI8F0fUARAhyyAJ99DqcDST7T2KZEGeVc4zPusaHEQQCeM1wi
xMZrhKQbr3HKWCBWKQGiI4o=
=YpG9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.