From unknown Mon Jun 23 07:46:04 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#7651 <7651@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#7651 <7651@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently Reply-To: bug#7651 <7651@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 14:46:04 +0000 retitle 7651 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conve= niently reassign 7651 emacs submitter 7651 Eli Zaretskii severity 7651 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 16 01:09:37 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2010 06:09:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PT721-0006lp-4s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:09:37 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PT71z-0006le-6s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:09:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PT784-0002ce-5i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:15:53 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:51809) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PT784-0002ca-36 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:15:52 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32858 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PT782-00062u-Um for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:15:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PT781-0002cQ-Gh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:15:50 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:44550) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PT781-0002cM-Db for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:15:49 -0500 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PT77y-0008NR-Ae for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:15:46 -0500 From: Eli Zaretskii To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently Message-Id: Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:15:46 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------) The new Rmail-MIME feature is nice, but it has some rough edges. One of them is that I lost an easy way of displaying many text attachments. Specifically, it looks like we display text attachments by default, but only if content-disposition is "inline". Maybe that's what the various RFCs mandate, but why isn't there at least a button to display the text (in the same or another buffer) if the user decides to do that? Previously, if I trusted the sender and the contents, I could type `e', then decode the attachment manually, and "C-c C-c" to read it as part of the message. Now I can only save the attachment to a file and visit it -- an inconvenience. For someone who gets to review patches, this is a serious inconvenience, especially since `v' does not seem to work anymore in the Rmail buffer. Also, there's something strange in the way we treat text/x-patch attachments as text. rmailmm.el has these 2 lines: ("text/.*" rmail-mime-text-handler) ("text/\\(x-\\)?patch" rmail-mime-bulk-handler) which to my interpretation mean that the second line will never be used, right? In GNU Emacs 23.2.91.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.9) of 2010-12-11 on fencepost configured using `configure '--with-jpeg=no' '--with-gif=no' '--with-tiff=no'' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: nil value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: nil default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: RMAIL Minor modes in effect: display-time-mode: t show-paren-mode: t savehist-mode: t tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t Recent input: ESC O A ESC O A ESC O A ESC O A ESC O A ESC O A ESC O A ESC O A ESC O A ESC O A ESC O B ESC O C ESC O C ESC O C ESC O C ESC O C ESC O C ESC O C C-r C-w C-w C-w C-w C-r C-x C-x C-s C-s C-s ESC O A C-x C-x C-r C-r ESC O A ESC O A ESC O D ESC O D ESC O D ESC O D C-s C-w C-w C-w C-w C-w C-w C-s C-s C-s C-x C-x C-s C-s C-s ESC O q ESC O A ESC O A C-x C-_ ESC O A C-_ C-x b RET ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p SPC SPC SPC SPC ESC p ESC p SPC ESC p ESC n ESC p ESC p SPC ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p SPC ESC p SPC ESC p SPC ESC p SPC SPC ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p SPC ESC p SPC ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p SPC SPC ESC p ESC p SPC SPC ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p SPC SPC ESC p SPC SPC SPC ESC p ESC p SPC ESC p SPC SPC SPC ESC p ESC p SPC SPC ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p n d ESC p p p SPC p p SPC p SPC p p p p p p p SPC C-x o ESC > C-x o ESC x r e p o r t - e m TAB RET Recent messages: Making completion list... Mark set Mark saved where search started [9 times] Undo! call-interactively: End of buffer [3 times] Showing message 1124 Showing message 1124...done Showing message 1124 Showing message 1124...done Mark set Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow emacsbug help-mode view two-column dabbrev newcomment flyspell ispell etags ring vc-bzr cc-mode cc-fonts cc-menus cc-cmds cc-styles cc-align cc-engine cc-vars cc-defs multi-isearch rmailsum rmailmm message sendmail regexp-opt ecomplete rfc822 mml easymenu mml-sec password-cache mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mailcap mailabbrev nnheader gnus-util netrc gmm-utils wid-edit mailheader canlock sha1 hex-util hashcash mail-parse rfc2231 rmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums time-date qp mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils time paren cus-start cus-load savehist saveplace tooltip ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel x-win x-dnd font-setting tool-bar dnd fontset image fringe lisp-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mldrag mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev loaddefs button minibuffer faces cus-face files text-properties overlay md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process font-render-setting gtk x-toolkit x multi-tty emacs) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 16 02:02:10 2010 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2010 07:02:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PT7qs-0007t1-Ih for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:02:10 -0500 Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PT7qp-0007sS-CG for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:02:08 -0500 Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oBG78I1o025228; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:08:18 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from smtp2.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oBG78ISH014031; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:08:18 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: by smtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oBG78Hd3018140; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:08:17 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PT7wn-00015Q-Cb; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:08:17 +0900 From: Kenichi Handa To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently In-Reply-To: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:15:46 -0500) References: Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:08:17 +0900 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) In article , Eli Zaretskii writes: > The new Rmail-MIME feature is nice, but it has some rough edges. One > of them is that I lost an easy way of displaying many text > attachments. > Specifically, it looks like we display text attachments by default, > but only if content-disposition is "inline". Maybe that's what the > various RFCs mandate, but why isn't there at least a button to display > the text (in the same or another buffer) if the user decides to do > that? I noticed this problem with the original rmail-mime behaviour too, and I'm now working on providing a convenient way. > Also, there's something strange in the way we treat text/x-patch > attachments as text. rmailmm.el has these 2 lines: > ("text/.*" rmail-mime-text-handler) > ("text/\\(x-\\)?patch" rmail-mime-bulk-handler) > which to my interpretation mean that the second line will never be > used, right? I didn't change that part from the original. And anyway, currently rmail-mime-media-type-handlers-alist is not used when rmail-enable-mime is t. That's because the API of the handler function is not usable for the new behavior, but we should not change it at this moment. I'm trying hard not to change the original hevaior of M-x rmail-mime. I hope I can commit related changes within this week. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 16 12:27:36 2010 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2010 17:27:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTHc8-0006bA-Ey for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:27:36 -0500 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTHc5-0006ar-Dy for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:27:34 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LDJ00F007EGTO00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:33:51 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.167.122]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LDJ00E7Y7GEKVB0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:33:51 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:33:55 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Kenichi Handa Message-id: <83k4j9hbb0.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > From: Kenichi Handa > Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:08:17 +0900 > > I hope I can commit related changes within this week. Thank you. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 17 10:22:45 2010 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2010 15:22:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTc8q-0007be-Sl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:22:45 -0500 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTc8f-0007bD-TJ for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:22:42 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LDK00500VVEEP00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:28:52 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.167.122]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LDK005EFWBX8F30@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:28:46 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:28:52 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Kenichi Handa Message-id: <8339pwh0zv.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > From: Kenichi Handa > Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:08:17 +0900 > > > The new Rmail-MIME feature is nice, but it has some rough edges. One > > of them is that I lost an easy way of displaying many text > > attachments. > > > Specifically, it looks like we display text attachments by default, > > but only if content-disposition is "inline". Maybe that's what the > > various RFCs mandate, but why isn't there at least a button to display > > the text (in the same or another buffer) if the user decides to do > > that? Another minor issue with rmail-mm is that the header lines it inserts in place of the attachments do not have a newline after them, so a typical message will end up being displayed in a buffer with no final newline. Not a big deal, obviously. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 23 23:44:17 2010 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2010 04:44:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PVzVo-00015m-RP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:44:17 -0500 Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PVzVm-00015X-H6 for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:44:16 -0500 Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oBO4onPZ017928; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:50:50 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from smtp1.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oBO4onB6005187; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:50:49 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: by smtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oBO4omnm005061; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:50:48 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PVzc8-00028o-FI; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:50:48 +0900 From: Kenichi Handa To: Kenichi Handa Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently In-Reply-To: (message from Kenichi Handa on Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:08:17 +0900) References: Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:50:48 +0900 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: eliz@gnu.org, 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) In article , Kenichi Handa writes: > I hope I can commit related changes within this week. I've just committed several changes to improve MIME handling. Attached is the relevant part of NEWS. Rmail users please check the new behavior. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org ------------------------------------------------------------ ** Rmail ** The default value of `rmail-enable-mime' is now t. Rmail decodes MIME contents automatically. You can customize the variable `rmail-enable-mime' back to `nil' to disable this automatic MIME decoding. ** The command `rmail-mime' change the displaying of a MIME message between decoded presentation form and raw data if `rmail-enable-mime' is non-nil. And, with prefix argument, it change only the displaying of the MIME entity at point. ** The new command TAB (rmail-mime-next-item) moves point to the next item of MIME message. ** The new command backtab (rmail-mime-previous-item) moves point to the previous item of MIME message. ** The new command RET (rmail-mime-toggle-hidden) hide or show the body of the MIME entity at point. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 24 03:11:19 2010 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2010 08:11:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PW2kB-0005Uy-Ca for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:11:19 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PW2k8-0005Um-Pk for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:11:17 -0500 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27915186DECA; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:17:54 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: L9ZK6wwN4PmAL9RgCWSJpa0KcCoEJXFWIPdQ9TrEE6w= Received: from linux.local (p508B17B6.dip.t-dialin.net [80.139.23.182]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2BEAE1C003AF; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:17:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id CAC241E52EC; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:17:53 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Kenichi Handa Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently References: X-Yow: Civilization is fun! Anyway, it keeps me busy!! Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:17:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:50:48 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Kenichi Handa writes: > ** The new command TAB (rmail-mime-next-item) moves point to the next > item of MIME message. A key is not a command. ** The new command rmail-mime-next-item (bound to TAB) moves point to the next item of MIME message. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 24 06:16:18 2010 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2010 11:16:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PW5dB-0000zm-Lb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:16:17 -0500 Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PW5d8-0000zZ-TR for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:16:16 -0500 Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oBOBMqcT005638; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:22:52 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oBOBMpLj024428; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:22:51 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oBOBMo7s009505; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:22:50 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PW5jW-0002g7-Nq; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:22:50 +0900 From: Kenichi Handa To: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently In-Reply-To: (message from Andreas Schwab on Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:17:53 +0100) References: Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:22:50 +0900 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) In article , Andreas Schwab writes: > Kenichi Handa writes: > > ** The new command TAB (rmail-mime-next-item) moves point to the next > > item of MIME message. > A key is not a command. > ** The new command rmail-mime-next-item (bound to TAB) moves point to > the next item of MIME message. Ah, I see, thank you. Just installed fixes. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 27 06:02:14 2010 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Dec 2010 11:02:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PXAqE-0005BB-CK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 06:02:14 -0500 Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PXAqB-0005Ax-6Q for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 06:02:12 -0500 Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oBRB8ugt000317; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:08:56 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from smtp1.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oBRB8ugf013662; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:08:56 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: by smtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oBRB8tcY008690; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:08:55 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PXAwh-0007eI-CX; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:08:55 +0900 From: Kenichi Handa To: Kenichi Handa Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently In-Reply-To: (message from Kenichi Handa on Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:50:48 +0900) References: Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:08:55 +0900 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: eliz@gnu.org, 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) In article , Kenichi Handa writes: > I've just committed several changes to improve MIME > handling. Attached is the relevant part of NEWS. Rmail > users please check the new behavior. I've just described the new behavior in info (doc/emacs/rmail.texi). Could someone please fix/improve my English? --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org ---- this is the relevant part in rmail.texi ---- @cindex MIME messages (Rmail) @vindex rmail-enable-mime Rmail, by default, decodes a MIME message and display the body part(s) in a humar readable way. If the message contains multiple parts (entities), each part has an additional single tagline that contains the information about depth, index, and type of the part. It may also contain buttons to handle the part (for saving or image-showing). If you customize @code{rmail-enable-mime} to @code{nil} (the default is @code{t}), Rmail does not show MIME decoded message until a user explicitly requires it. @table @kbd @findex rmail-mime-toggle-hidden @item @key{RET} Hide or show the body of a MIME entity at point. @findex rmail-mime-next-item @item @key{TAB} Move point to the next displayed item of MIME entity (part). @findex rmail-mime-previous-item @item @key{BackTab} Move point to the previous displayed item of MIME entity (part). @findex rmail-mime @item v @kindex v @r{(Rmail)} The @kbd{v} (@code{rmail-mime}) command toggles the display of a MIME message between the raw mode and the default mode. In the raw mode, the undecoded MIME data is displayed. With a prefix argument, it toggles the display of only an entity at point. But, if the variable @code{rmail-enable-mime} is @code{nil}, the command creates a temporary buffer displaying the current MIME message. By default, it displays plain text and multipart messages, and offers buttons to save attachments. @end table From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 30 07:32:50 2010 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2010 12:32:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PYHgY-0006Xz-5s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 07:32:50 -0500 Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PYHgW-0006Xn-60 for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 07:32:48 -0500 Received: from furball (bb220-255-229-62.singnet.com.sg [220.255.229.62]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBUCdcFr019927 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 30 Dec 2010 07:39:42 -0500 Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DAA62161DAF; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:39:36 +0800 (SGT) From: Chong Yidong To: Kenichi Handa Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently References: Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:39:36 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:08:55 +0900") Message-ID: <87vd2ba0zb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: eliz@gnu.org, 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Kenichi Handa writes: > I've just described the new behavior in info > (doc/emacs/rmail.texi). Could someone please fix/improve my > English? Done. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 01 05:51:47 2011 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2011 10:51:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PYz3r-0000vi-Hj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 05:51:47 -0500 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PYz3o-0000vU-LE for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 05:51:45 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LEC00H00BTARE00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:58:36 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.219.104]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LEC00HYNBTM4M70@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:58:36 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:00:44 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Kenichi Handa Message-id: <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Kenichi Handa > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, 7651@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:50:48 +0900 > > In article , Kenichi Handa writes: > > I hope I can commit related changes within this week. > > I've just committed several changes to improve MIME > handling. Attached is the relevant part of NEWS. Rmail > users please check the new behavior. Thanks. I just started using it. It is much better now. I have only a couple of minor issues to report so far: . Sometimes, in a multi-part message, it displays only a header, with no body and no buttons to toggle its display, save it to a file, etc. Like this (in the RMAIL buffer, this is flushed all the way to the left margin): [2:text/html] It looks like this happens only for text/html parts, btw. Nevertheless, bodies of some text/html parts _are_ displayed. The only difference I could spot is that those which are displayed have an tag at their beginning. . When point is on the header line of part N, TAB moves to the beginning of the first line of the body of that part, not to the header of the next part (N+1). Is this intentional? If so, what is the reason for this behavior? . I wonder whether it will make more sense to bind mouse-1, rather than mouse-2, to push-button on the "Toggle show/hide" button. After all, the default binding of mouse-1 on that spot is not useful. More importantly, bug #7626 is still not resolved fully, although some of the more blatant parts of it (like keeping the encoding of the previously displayed message) are gone. I will report about that separately, in that bug. Thanks a lot for working on this. I think this bug could be closed after dealing with the above issues; if there are other problems, they could be filed as separate bugs. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 01 10:17:46 2011 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2011 15:17:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ3DG-0007P2-1H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:17:46 -0500 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ3DC-0007On-BK for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:17:44 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LEC00K00NWFI300@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 17:24:31 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.127.157]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LEC00JMYO4TRMA0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 17:24:31 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 17:26:40 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently In-reply-to: <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: handa@m17n.org Message-id: <83fwtcprv3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:00:44 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org > > Thanks. I just started using it. It is much better now. I have only > a couple of minor issues to report so far: Here's one more problem, a more serious one. The message reproduced below, posted today to emacs-devel, is by default displayed with no body at all for the 1st part, like this (indentation added): From: David Kuehling To: Ken Raeburn Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 15:20:58 +0100 Cc: rms@gnu.org, Emacs Dev Subject: Re: Some OpenWrt port related problems [1:multipart/signed] [2:application/pgp-signature file:noname (189B)] I guess we need to handle parts with no Content-Type at all? Here's the original message, copied from the RMAIL buffer after toggling the display with `v' (again, indentation added): From emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 01 09:21:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: eliz@gnu.org Delivery-date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50257) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ2Ko-0003mt-2D for eliz@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ2Kq-00016f-DO for eliz@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:33 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_MIME_NO_TEXT autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:57125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ2Kp-00016U-KE for eliz@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:31 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54155 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZ2Kp-0005ny-FW for eliz@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:31 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33845 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZ2KU-0005ns-Ld for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ2KS-0000ys-P1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:10 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:56759 helo=mail.gmx.net) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ2KS-0000yf-CX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:08 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Jan 2011 14:21:05 -0000 Received: from g225041162.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO snail.gmx.de) [92.225.41.162] by mail.gmx.net (mp045) with SMTP; 01 Jan 2011 15:21:05 +0100 X-Authenticated: #4121607 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1//MpsRJHX/GjPLea+HpHz6pI07dsTdZCK9rl/RiR Tae4tRtlRKjlu2 From: David Kuehling To: Ken Raeburn References: <87sjxi5hko.fsf@snail.Pool> <87lj39y52n.fsf@snail.Pool> <87pqsl7wt7.fsf@snail.Pool> <66798668-5808-473B-BF11-DF4DBA5464A1@raeburn.org> Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 15:20:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <66798668-5808-473B-BF11-DF4DBA5464A1@raeburn.org> (Ken Raeburn's message of "Wed, 29 Dec 2010 23:08:09 -0500") Message-ID: <8739pc9039.fsf@snail.Pool> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Cc: rms@gnu.org, Emacs Dev Subject: Re: Some OpenWrt port related problems X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES: -------- --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> "Ken" =3D=3D Ken Raeburn writes: > On Dec 29, 2010, at 04:28, David Kuehling wrote: >> I could dump Emacs in the target system, from a wrapper script, when >> launched for the first time. But last time I tried that it failed >> with insufficient memory (32Mb RAM, no swap), so I'm going without >> dumping for now. > It sounds like running Emacs on such a system is going to be pretty > marginal in any case, but do you recall what part of it failed? > Finding the doc strings? The actual dumping? Ok, just recompiled emacs with dumping support, and running $ emacs -Q --batch --eval \ '(dump-emacs "./demacs" "/usr/bin/emacs")' on the NanoNote gave me: [..] Loading ediff-hook... Finding pointers to doc strings... Finding pointers to doc strings...done emacs: Can't allocate buffer for /usr/bin/emacs So it wants to pull a full copy of the emacs binary into memory? This problem I can workaround by changing the Linux overcommit setting, but then dumping fails with another problem: $ echo "1" > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory=20 $ emacs -Q --batch --eval \ '(dump-emacs "./demacs" "/usr/bin/emacs")' [..] Finding pointers to doc strings... Finding pointers to doc strings...done emacs: Program segment above .bss in /usr/bin/emacs So what's that supposed to mean?=20=20 cheers, David =2D-=20 GnuPG public key: http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~dvdkhlng/dk.gpg Fingerprint: B17A DC95 D293 657B 4205 D016 7DEF 5323 C174 7D40 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFNHzhLfe9TI8F0fUARAhyyAJ99DqcDST7T2KZEGeVc4zPusaHEQQCeM1wi xMZrhKQbr3HKWCBWKQGiI4o= =YpG9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 03 23:54:10 2011 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2011 04:54:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZyuP-0007Eb-Mt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:54:09 -0500 Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZyuN-0007E5-4V for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:54:08 -0500 Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p0451CQH001147; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:01:12 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p0451Cw0009650; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:01:12 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p0451BAT025677; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:01:11 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZz1D-0002KI-Di; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:01:11 +0900 From: Kenichi Handa To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently In-Reply-To: <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:00:44 +0200) References: <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:01:11 +0900 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) In article <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > . Sometimes, in a multi-part message, it displays only a header, with > no body and no buttons to toggle its display, save it to a file, > etc. Like this (in the RMAIL buffer, this is flushed all the way > to the left margin): > [2:text/html] You still can toggle hide/show by typing RET while point is on that tagline. > It looks like this happens only for text/html parts, btw. > Nevertheless, bodies of some text/html parts _are_ displayed. The > only difference I could spot is that those which are displayed have > an tag at their beginning. By default, inline text/plain, message/rfc822, multipart/* parts are shown with their bodies except for these cases. If the top level mesage is text/html, the body is shown. If the text/html part is the only text/* part of a multipart/alternative, the body of text/html is shown. > . When point is on the header line of part N, TAB moves to the > beginning of the first line of the body of that part, not to the > header of the next part (N+1). Is this intentional? If so, what > is the reason for this behavior? It's intentional as described in the docstring of rmail-mime-next-item. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Move point to the next displayed item of the current MIME entity. A MIME entity has three items; header, tagline, and body. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- But there's no strong reason for that behavior. I just thought it's convenient if you can move to a body part by TAB especially for a message/rfc822 part which is displayed with header lines. > . I wonder whether it will make more sense to bind mouse-1, rather > than mouse-2, to push-button on the "Toggle show/hide" button. > After all, the default binding of mouse-1 on that spot is not > useful. For "Toggle show/hide" button, perhaps yes. But for a button of file saving, one may want to select the displayed filename by mouse-1. So mouse-2 is better. Then, for consistency, using mouse-2 also for "Toggle show/hide" may be better. But, I'm not sure because I uses only TAB and RET. > More importantly, bug #7626 is still not resolved fully, although some > of the more blatant parts of it (like keeping the encoding of the > previously displayed message) are gone. I will report about that > separately, in that bug. I'll check the code again for that problem. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 04 00:29:42 2011 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2011 05:29:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZzSo-0007yG-1v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:29:42 -0500 Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZzSl-0007y2-4k for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:29:40 -0500 Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p045aiqP012128; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:36:45 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p045aiCN016220; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:36:44 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p045aiqr006702; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:36:44 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZzZc-0002Pw-3B; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:36:44 +0900 From: Kenichi Handa To: Chong Yidong Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently In-Reply-To: <87vd2ba0zb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:39:36 +0800) References: <87vd2ba0zb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:36:43 +0900 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: eliz@gnu.org, 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) In article <87vd2ba0zb.fsf@stupidchicken.com>, Chong Yidong writes: > Kenichi Handa writes: > > I've just described the new behavior in info > > (doc/emacs/rmail.texi). Could someone please fix/improve my > > English? > Done. Thank you. But, this senetence will be misunderstood: If the message contains multiple parts (@acronym{MIME} entities), each part is represented by a tagline in the Rmail buffer. Actually, a text/plain part is shown both with a tagline and the decoded body. Does "represented" imply that? And, this is not accurate. @findex rmail-mime-next-item @item @key{TAB} Move point to the next @acronym{MIME} part (@code{rmail-mime-next-item}). It actually moves point to the next displayed items; header, tagline, buttons in tagline, or body. It moves point to the next part only if there's no more displayed item in the current part. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 04 01:27:30 2011 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2011 06:27:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pa0Mk-0000oi-I4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:27:30 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pa0Mj-0000oX-6t for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:27:29 -0500 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pa0TZ-00042l-SJ; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:34:33 -0500 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Kenichi Handa In-reply-to: (message from Kenichi Handa on Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:01:11 +0900) Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently References: <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org> Message-Id: Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:34:33 -0500 X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------) > From: Kenichi Handa > Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:01:11 +0900 > > In article <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > . Sometimes, in a multi-part message, it displays only a header, with > > no body and no buttons to toggle its display, save it to a file, > > etc. Like this (in the RMAIL buffer, this is flushed all the way > > to the left margin): > > > [2:text/html] > > You still can toggle hide/show by typing RET while point is > on that tagline. But IMO it's confusingly inconsistent, so I think we should have a toggle button there as well, when we don't show the body by default. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 04 01:28:26 2011 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2011 06:28:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pa0Nd-0000q7-Oi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:28:26 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pa0Nb-0000pv-Tn for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:28:24 -0500 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pa0US-00044I-HN; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:35:28 -0500 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Kenichi Handa In-reply-to: (message from Kenichi Handa on Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:36:43 +0900) Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently References: <87vd2ba0zb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Message-Id: Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:35:28 -0500 X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------) > From: Kenichi Handa > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, 7651@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:36:43 +0900 > > And, this is not accurate. > > @findex rmail-mime-next-item > @item @key{TAB} > Move point to the next @acronym{MIME} part > (@code{rmail-mime-next-item}). Looks like Chong expected the same as I did ;-) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 04 02:09:29 2011 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2011 07:09:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pa11N-0001i3-AM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 02:09:29 -0500 Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pa11K-0001hq-IT for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 02:09:28 -0500 Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p047GWt1010826; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:16:32 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p047GWeU000699; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:16:32 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p047GWxP007575; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:16:32 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pa18B-0002mO-SU; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:16:31 +0900 From: Kenichi Handa To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently In-Reply-To: <83fwtcprv3.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 01 Jan 2011 17:26:40 +0200) References: <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org> <83fwtcprv3.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:16:31 +0900 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) In article <83fwtcprv3.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > Here's one more problem, a more serious one. The message reproduced > below, posted today to emacs-devel, is by default displayed with no > body at all for the 1st part, like this (indentation added): > From: David Kuehling > To: Ken Raeburn > Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 15:20:58 +0100 > Cc: rms@gnu.org, Emacs Dev > Subject: Re: Some OpenWrt port related problems > [1:multipart/signed] > [2:application/pgp-signature file:noname (189B)] > I guess we need to handle parts with no Content-Type at all? Sure. I've just installed a fix. In the above message, the first part incorrectly inherited the default type as "multipart/signed". It should be "text/plain". And the second part is surely "application/pgp-signature" which current rmailmm doesn't know how to handle, but I made the body shown as a text by typing RET. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 07 02:06:01 2011 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2011 07:06:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pb6Of-0000Ja-7S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 02:06:01 -0500 Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pb6Oc-0000JE-A2 for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 02:05:59 -0500 Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p077DCDE025091; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:13:12 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from smtp1.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p077DCRl019853; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:13:12 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: by smtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p077DBGh011023; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:13:11 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pb6Vb-0002Hk-JZ; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 16:13:11 +0900 From: Kenichi Handa To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently In-Reply-To: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:34:33 -0500) References: <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 16:13:11 +0900 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) In article , Eli Zaretskii writes: > > You still can toggle hide/show by typing RET while point is > > on that tagline. > But IMO it's confusingly inconsistent, so I think we should have a > toggle button there as well, when we don't show the body by default. As we can toggle all entities, to be consistent, we must have toggle buttons on all entities. But, I think it results in a little bit annoying display. So, how about making each content-type string (e.g. "text/plain", "image/png" in tagline) a button instead of having "Toggle show/hide" button? --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 07 02:45:44 2011 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2011 07:45:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pb716-0001Cf-0N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 02:45:44 -0500 Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pb714-0001CS-46 for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 02:45:43 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LEN00I00747BW00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 09:52:57 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.127.157]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LEN00HQ3788WVD0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 09:52:57 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 09:53:02 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Kenichi Handa Message-id: <83oc7tkv4x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Kenichi Handa > Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 16:13:11 +0900 > > As we can toggle all entities, to be consistent, we must > have toggle buttons on all entities. But, I think it > results in a little bit annoying display. So, how about > making each content-type string (e.g. "text/plain", > "image/png" in tagline) a button instead of having "Toggle > show/hide" button? That would be okay, too, but since those buttons' visual appearance has no cue to the fact that they are buttons, we should either change their visual appearance, or maybe add some textual hint, like "[1:text/plain (RET to show/hide)]". I also don't think adding a "Toggle show/hide" button would make the display annoying. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 12 01:14:51 2011 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2011 06:14:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pctyt-0002OS-KT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:14:51 -0500 Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pctyr-0002OE-0X for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:14:50 -0500 Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p0C6MFYF010019; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:22:16 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from smtp1.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p0C6MF3E004514; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:22:15 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: by smtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p0C6MFmt018827; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:22:15 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pcu62-0002ZQ-Sk; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:22:14 +0900 From: Kenichi Handa To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently In-Reply-To: <83oc7tkv4x.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 09:53:02 +0200) References: <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org> <83oc7tkv4x.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:22:14 +0900 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) In article <83oc7tkv4x.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > As we can toggle all entities, to be consistent, we must > > have toggle buttons on all entities. But, I think it > > results in a little bit annoying display. So, how about > > making each content-type string (e.g. "text/plain", > > "image/png" in tagline) a button instead of having "Toggle > > show/hide" button? > That would be okay, too, but since those buttons' visual appearance > has no cue to the fact that they are buttons, we should either change > their visual appearance, or maybe add some textual hint, like > "[1:text/plain (RET to show/hide)]". I've just committed several changes. In it, I made the tagline something like this (~~~~ indicate underlined part): [1:text/plain Hide] ~~~~ [2:image/png Show Save:temp.png (XXkB)] ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ and made the button label itself toggles between "Hide" and "Show". Another change is to bind tab and backtab simply to forward-button and backward-button respectively because all taglines has at least Hide or Show button now. Please try this version for a while. I'll update NEWS and info when it is found that this version is good enough for the next release. By the way, I can't reproduce the incorrect setting of buffer-file-coding-system. Could you "recend" the problematic mail, and let me know the subject line in another mail so that I can identify that problematic mail. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 12 05:50:54 2011 Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2011 10:50:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PcyI2-0008Kp-9z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:50:54 -0500 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PcyI0-0008Ke-J1 for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:50:53 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LEW00400OJ06B00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:58:19 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.131.253]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LEW00HJXP55VM55@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:58:19 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:58:21 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Kenichi Handa Message-id: <83fwsyie2a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org> <83oc7tkv4x.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651 Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Kenichi Handa > Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:22:14 +0900 > > I've just committed several changes. In it, I made the > tagline something like this (~~~~ indicate underlined part): > > [1:text/plain Hide] > ~~~~ > [2:image/png Show Save:temp.png (XXkB)] > ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ > > and made the button label itself toggles between "Hide" and > "Show". > > Another change is to bind tab and backtab simply to > forward-button and backward-button respectively because all > taglines has at least Hide or Show button now. > > Please try this version for a while. I'll update NEWS and > info when it is found that this version is good enough for > the next release. Thanks, will do. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 19 03:58:23 2011 Received: (at 7651-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2011 07:58:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGR2d-0008Lt-GC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:58:23 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGR2a-0008LZ-SI for 7651-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:58:22 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LTA00700ZD40700@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 7651-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:56:44 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.212.197]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LTA006MDZEJDOA0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 7651-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:56:44 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:56:45 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: 7651-done@debbugs.gnu.org Message-id: <838vohv2gy.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7651-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) This bug was fixed quite some time ago, it's time to close it. From unknown Mon Jun 23 07:46:04 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator