GNU bug report logs - #76503
[GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 15:21:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Full log


Message #608 received at 76503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 76503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Guix Devel <guix-devel <at> gnu.org>,
 Steve George <steve <at> futurile.net>
Subject: Re: [bug#76503] [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to
 Codeberg
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 11:59:35 -0400
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 05:33:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Oh, I perhaps mistakenly assumed “deliberation” was the same as French
> “délibération”, “decision taken by a governing body”:
> 
>   https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/d%C3%A9lib%C3%A9ration

------
délibération f (plural délibérations)

1)    deliberation; contemplation
2)    deliberation; discussion
3)    deliberation (decision taken by a governing body)
------

I agree with Steve that this use of 'deliberation' is unusual, at least
in American English. From the wiktionary entry above, I'm familiar with
first 2 senses of the word, but not the 3rd. I would expect to hear a
a phrase like "... the outcome of the deliberation ...".

I also agree that it's important to de-emphasize the idea of a vote and
focus on working together to build consensus. Instead of "voting
records", what about just using a term like "decision", "decision
taken", "decision made", etc?




This bug report was last modified 16 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.