GNU bug report logs -
#76503
[GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hello,
Steve George <steve <at> futurile.net> writes:
> I collated the results of the voting on GCD 002.
[...]
> Voting result:
> - 67% (33 votes) voted to pass the GCD
> - 0% disapproved
> - 33% abstained by not voting
>
> As more than 25% of members voted to pass, and there were no disapprovals this GCD is accepted as final and may now be implemented.
This is good news. I’ll prepare a blog post to communicate more broadly
about the upcoming changes and start working on the items listed in the
GCD… with as many of you as possible I hope!
It’s going to be a process with many aspects necessitating fine-tuning.
Let’s not forget concerns raised by those who were less enthusiastic so
that this change is as inclusive as possible.
> * Please check that I captured **your vote** correctly, the voting tally is here:
>
> https://codeberg.org/futurile/guix-org/src/branch/master/gcd-voting-summary/gcd002-voting-record.rec
>
> * Voting summary for this GCD is here:
>
> https://codeberg.org/futurile/guix-org/src/branch/master/gcd-voting-summary/gcd002-voting-summary.md
>
> Hope this is useful!
Very! Thanks for capturing this information.
I think it would make sense to add it in a sub-directory of
guix-consensus-documents.git, and IMO does not require a change of
GCD 001 (though we could eventually propose to amend GCD 001 to
explicitly mention said sub-directory).
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 16 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.