GNU bug report logs - #76503
[GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 15:21:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Full log


Message #362 received at 76503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Cc: 76503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Guix Devel <guix-devel <at> gnu.org>,
 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#76503: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to
 Codeberg
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 22:53:06 +0100
Hello,

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>>>     c) A discussion allowing write-access for dedicated
>>> branches.
>>
>> Opening a PR gives access to a dedicated branch; I suppose that
>> would be
>> the main approach, available to everyone.
>>
>> Getting a dedicated branch on the guix/guix repo wouldn’t be
>> different
>> from now, where committers can create branches on their own.
>>
>> What would you add on this topic in the document?
>
> Can we as "owners" of the repository grant individuals write access to
> a dedicated branch that was opened by a pull request? This would allow
> a team to grant a collaborator write access to pushing to their team
> branch.

When adding a “collaborator”, we give them read or write access to the
repo.

But then, the branch protection rules let you restrict push to only
specific users and/or teams.

So we could arrange so that only members of a specific team can push to
‘master’, for instance.

Though I’m not sure we have to come up with something more sophisticated
than we currently have, at least not from Day 1.

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 16 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.