GNU bug report logs - #76503
[GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 15:21:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Full log


Message #344 received at 76503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, Vagrant Cascadian
 <vagrant <at> debian.org>
Cc: 76503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Guix Devel <guix-devel <at> gnu.org>,
 Felix Lechner <felix.lechner <at> lease-up.com>,
 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#76503] [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches
 to Codeberg
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:46:45 +0100
Hi Ludo,

On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 at 22:22, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org> skribis:
>
>> From my personal experiences with Debian, it looks to me possible to do
>> both systems for a long time, but the extent of the downsides are
>> unclear to me.

That’s my proposal: having more milestones for the Migration Paths.

> I’d say that the main downsides of having two systems, for
> new/occasional contributors would be confusion (where am I supposed to
> report issues/propose changes?) and extra work (having to search in both
> places).
>
> For regular contributors, it’s extra work of checking two systems,
> missing out if you choose to use check only one.
>
> For the community, fragmentation, information loss (due to having to
> manually check if a topic is discussed in the other system), extra
> friction due to difficulties to refer to entries across systems.

Somehow, I’m a bit confused.  One argument is to say: Codeberg has a
nice API. Cool!  Therefore, on one hand, people™ can adapt their own
tools in order to exploit it.  However, on the other hand, people™
cannot exploit it to teach Mumi and/or etc/teams.scm.

Well, I do not see any drawbacks if we are crystal clear that Codeberg
and PR will be the main entry-point and the reference.

Cheers,
simon




This bug report was last modified 16 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.